Skip to main content

Discretion and Foreign Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Case Against Bureaucratic Discretion
  • 270 Accesses

Abstract

Internationally oriented security organizations operate with broad discretion under a web of relative secrecy. The nature of clandestine operations somewhat insulates these organizations from public oversight. At the same time, the need for vigilant supervision of the relatively hidden activities is ever greater. This chapter describes the creation and evolution of internationally oriented security organizations such as the Central Intelligence Agency and National Security Agency. These organizations are responsible for numerous successes but also many embarrassments where false information was reported, human rights violations occurred, or the will of Congress subverted. These represent examples of bureaucratic overreach that weakened, rather than strengthened, the US reputation as a nation of laws, not men. The chapter describes how falsified body count reports in the Vietnam War, “harsh interrogations” at Abu Ghraib, and illegal supply of weapons to Nicaragua all were carried out in relative secrecy until the actions could no longer be concealed. The chapter concludes with a discussion of how whistleblowing and the ensuing media attention can reverse illegal or simply counterproductive behavior of government agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aid, M. M. (2009). The secret sentry: The untold history of the National Security Agency. New York: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D. L. (2002). The Columbia guide to the Vietnam War. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bamford, J. (2002). Body of secrets. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T. L. (1990). The origins of the National Security Agency: 1940–1952. Center for Cryptologic History, National Security Agency, Series V, 1. Retrieved September 4, 2018, from https://permanent.access.gpo.gov/gpo73503/origins_of_nsa.pdf

  • Daddis, G. (2012). The problem of metrics: Assessing progress and effectiveness in the Vietnam War. War in History, 19(1), 73–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daugherty, W. J. (2004). Executive secrets: Covert action and the presidency. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine, M. E. (2018, June 18). Intelligence community spending: Trends and issues. Congressional Research Service. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://fas.org/sgp/crs/intel/R44381.pdf

  • Esman, A. R. (2014, June 24). European reports show NSA’s successes. Retrieved September 12, 2018, from https://www.investigativeproject.org/

  • Fitzgerald, B. (2006). Alum’s book credits CIA analyst with uncovering Vietnam ‘numbers gap.’ BU Today. Retrieved September 17, 2018, from http://www.bu.edu/today

  • Friedman, U. (2012, January 3). The ten biggest American intelligence failures. Foreign Policy. Retrieved September 21, 2018, from https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/01/03/

  • Gellman, B., & Miller, G. (2013, August 29). ‘Black budget’ summary details U.S. spy networks successes, failures, and objectives. Washington Post. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/

  • Greenwald, G. (2014). No place to hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. surveillance state. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koven, S. G. (2008). Responsible governance: A case study approach. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, R. (2017). Iran-Contra affair. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved January 11, 2017, from https://www.britannica.com/event/Iran-Contra-Affair

  • MacAskill, E. (2011, October 21). Iraq rejects US request to maintain bases after troop withdrawal. The Guardian. Retrieved September 29, 2018, from https://www.theguardian.com/

  • McCoy, A. W. (2006). A question of torture: CIA interrogation, from the cold war to the war on terror. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mestrovic, S. G. (2007). The trials of Abu Ghraib: An expert witness account of shame and honor. Boulder: Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murry, G. (2018). The on-going battle for the soul of the army. Retrieved September 17, 2018, from http://smallwarsjournal.com/

  • National Security Agency Releases History of Cold War Intelligence Activities. (2008). The National Security Archive. Retrieved September 12, 2018, from https://nsaarchive2.gwu.edu

  • Nelson, S. (2018, February 27). Trump sends Congress record high ‘black budget’ spy funding request. Washington Examiner. Retrieved September 11, 2018, from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/

  • Ransom, H. H. (1970). The intelligence establishment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ridenhour, R. (1969). A letter from Ron Ridenhour regarding the My Lai massacre (1969). Retrieved September 27, 2018, from https://alphahistory.com/

  • Weinstein, A. (2011, October 25). 5 presidents with the biggest approval ratings declines. Retrieved September 29, 2018, from https://listosaur.com/

  • Zelizer, J. (2018, February 27). Why the Russia investigation could be more like Iran-Contra than Watergate. The Atlantic. Retrieved September 26, 2018, from https://www.theatlantic.com/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven G. Koven .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Koven, S.G. (2019). Discretion and Foreign Policy. In: The Case Against Bureaucratic Discretion. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05779-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics