Skip to main content

Planning Challenges for Archaeological Heritage

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

Abstract

The cultural and historical accumulation of various cultures and their socio-spatial development throughout history have left behind numerous archaeological sites in contemporary Turkey. Some of the more popular ones, Çatalhöyük, Ephesus, Hierapolis, Troy, Hattusa, Pergamon, Aphrodisias and, more recently, Göbekli Tepe, which is a unique site that has dramatically changed the understanding of human history, are listed on the UNESCO World Heritage List . At all such sites, the primary concerns are related to site management, and these can be resolved through the provision of basic guidance and tools rather than through urban and regional planning strategies. This article focuses on the problems and recent planning discussions in urban or regional contexts related to the conservation of archaeological heritage. The article begins by discussing the current legislation and administrative framework to provide an understanding of recent planning issues in Turkey. Finally, the main themes of the article are two particular planning challenges related to archaeological heritage in Turkey—large-scale projects that threaten archaeological heritage and multi-layered historic city centres—which will be discussed in detail supported by case studies as İstanbul , Ankara , İzmir , Antakya , Tarsus and Bergama .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Morey (1936), Cadoux (1938), Downey (1963), Tankut (1993), Bilgin Altınöz (1996), Aru (1998), Uggeri (1998), Çağlayan (1999), Leblanc and Poccardi (1999), Tuna (1999a, b), Yerasimos (2000), Kuban (2001), Cerasi (2001), Wiener-Müller (2001), Bilgin (Altınöz) (2002), Savacı Gökbulut (2002), Dericioğlu and Tuna (2003), Belge (2005), Kadıoğlu and Görkay (2007), Köprülü Bağbancı (2007), Tankut (2007), Üstün (2008), Saban Ökesli (2009), Hovardaoğlu Çalışır (2009), Etyemez (2011), Assenat (2012), Belge (2012a, b), Eriçok (2012), Alpan (2013), Arusoğlu Erözkan (2013), Özdoğan (2013), Tuna and Belge (2013), Şahin (2015), Taşcı (2015), Belge (2016), Gök and Belge (2016), Bilgin (Altınöz) et al. (2016), Binan Ulusoy (2016), Taşcı and Akyüz Levi (2016), Belge and Aydınoğlu (2017) and Belge (2017).

References

  • Alpan A (2013) Urban restructuring process of antalya walled-town and the roles of stakeholders. Dissertation, Middle East Technical University

    Google Scholar 

  • Anadolu Agency (2018a) https://aa.com.tr/tr/turkiye/turkiye-727-olan-baraj-sayisini-5-yilda-ikiye-katlayacak/962533#. Accessed 10 Mar 2018

  • Anadolu Agency (2018b) https://aa.com.tr/tr/kultur-sanat/hasankeyfteki-kulturel-miras-bir-bir-tasiniyor/870508. Accessed 10 Mar 2018

  • Anadolu Medeniyetleri Müzesi (2018) Ören Yerleri/archaeological sites. http://www.anadolumedeniyetlerimuzesi.gov.tr/TR,77790/oren-yerleri.html. Accessed 30 Mar 2018

  • Ancient City of Smyrna (2018) Ancient City of Smyrna excavation - research - restoration project. http://www.antiksmyrna.com/default.aspx. Accessed 30 Mar 2018

  • Antakya Hilton Museum Hotel (2017) http://www.emrearolat.com/gallery/antakya-hilton-museum-hotel/ and http://www3.hilton.com/en/hotels/turkey/hilton-antakya-museum-hotel-HTYANHI/index.html. Accessed 8 Dec 2017

  • Arkitera (2018) Koruma Bölge Kurulları. http://v3.arkitera.com/news.php?action=displayNewsItem&ID=3525. Accessed 10 Mar 2018

  • Aru KA (1998) Türk Kenti (Türk Kent Dokularının İncelenmesine ve Bugünkü Koşullar İçinde Değerlendirilmesine İlişkin Yöntem Araştırması. Yapı-Endüstri Merkezi Yayınları, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Arusoğlu Erözkan Z (2013) Çok katmanlı kentlerde kimlik sorunsalı: Palimpsest bir kentsel alan olarak Ulus örneğinin incelenmesi. Dissertation, Istanbul Technical University

    Google Scholar 

  • Assenat M (2012) Amida Restituta. In: Gasse A, Servajean F, Thiers C (eds) Aegypto, et ad Aegyptum, Recueil d’Études dédiées à Jean-Claude Grenier, CENiM, Montpellier, PULM, pp 7–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Belge B (2004) Çok Katmanlı Tarihi Kent Merkezlerinin Yönetimi: Kentsel Arkeoloji ve Planlama. TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası, Planlama Dergisi 4:48–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Belge B (2005) Urban archaeological issues and resources in İzmir historic city centre: an exploratory case study. Dissertation, Middle East Technical University

    Google Scholar 

  • Belge B (2012a) Handling sub-soil urban archaeological resources in urban planning, Issues in İzmir historic city centre. METU-JFA 29(2):331–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Belge B (2012b) The effects of local conservation capacity to the maintenance of historic city centres as a governance process: Gaziantep and Şanlıurfa Case Study Areas. Dissertation, Middle East Technical University

    Google Scholar 

  • Belge B (2013) Türkiye’de Kentsel Arkeolojik Değerlerin Kent Yaşamına Katılımı Sorunsalı; Antakya Tarihi Kent Merkezi Örneği. In: Levent and Uçar (eds) Mersin’den Mimarlık Planlama Tasarım Yazıları, Mersin University Publishing, Mersin, pp 91–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Belge B (2016) Development of a methodological framework for handling urban archaeological resources: Tarsus Historic City Centre, Turkey. Conserv Manag Archaeol Sites 18(4):422–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belge B (2017) Issues in integrating urban archaeological resources into planning process: Tarsus historic city centre. METU-JFA 34(2):59–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Belge B, Aydınoğlu Ü (2017) Evaluating Tarsus’s spatial structure in roman times as a planning basemap. MEGARON 12(3):460–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgin G (1996) Urban archaeology: as the bases for the studies on the future of the town case study: Bergama. Dissertation, Middle East Technical University

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgin (Altınöz) G (2002) Assessment of historical stratification in multi-layered towns as a support for conservation decision-making process; A geographic information systems (GIS) based approach case study: Bergama. Dissertation, Middle East Technical University

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgin (Altınöz) G, Binan DU, Pirson F (2016) Pergamon and its multi-layered cultural landscape, In: Ertürk N and Karakul Ö (eds) UNESCO World Heritage in Turkey, Ankara, pp 342–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Binan Ulusoy D (2016) Traditional residential architecture of bergama in the context of urban archaeology and multi-layered cultural heritage. In: Ahunbay Z, Mazlum D, Eres Z (eds) Conservation of cultural heritage in Turkey. ICOMOS-TURKEY, İstanbul, pp 297–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadoux CJ (1938) Ancient Smyrna; A history of the city from the earliest times to 324 A.D. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Çağlayan D (1999) An assessment of urban archaeology and archaeological heritage: a case study in Ulus Ankara. Dissertation, Middle East Technical University

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerasi M (2001) Osmanlı Kenti Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nda 18. ve 19. Yüzyıllarda Kent Uygarlığı ve Mimarisi. Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Dericioğlu T, Tuna N (2003) Tarihi Suriçi (Diyarbakır/Türkiye) Merkezi’nin Kültürel Mirasın Korunması Göz Önüne Alınarak Kentsel Yenilenmesi ve Ekonomik Canlanması. GOPA-GTZ, Eschborn

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey G (1958) The size of the population of Antioch. In: Trans Proc Am Phil Assoc 89:84–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downey G (1963) Ancient antioch. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriçok Keleş A (2012) Impact of land use changes on the authentic characteristics of historical buildings in bursa historical city centre. Dissertation, Middle East Technical University

    Google Scholar 

  • Etyemez L (2011) Assessing the integration of historical stratification with the current context in multi-layered towns case study: Amasya. Dissertation, Middle East Technical University

    Google Scholar 

  • Gök T, Belge B (2016) Tarsus city: conservation issues of a multi-layered cultural heritage. In: Ahunbay Z, Mazlum D, Eres Z (eds) Conservation of cultural heritage in Turkey. ICOMOS-TURKEY, İstanbul, pp 325–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovardaoğlu Çalışır S (2009) Tarihi Süreklilikte Kentsel Katmanlaşmanın Belgelenmesi Bağlamında Kayseri Kent Merkezi. Dissertation, Istanbul Technical University

    Google Scholar 

  • ICOMOS (2017) Heritage@Risk. https://www.icomos.org/en/what-we-do/risk-preparedness/heritage-at-risk-reports. Accessed 22 Feb 2017

  • İstanbul Arkeoloji Müzesi (2012) Yenikapı Kazıları Resmi İnternet Sayfası. http://www.istanbularkeoloji.gov.tr/…/muze/kazilar/yenikapi_kazilari. Accessed 1 Feb 2012

  • Kadıoğlu M, Görkay K (2007) Yeni arkeolojik araştırmalar ışığında μητρόπολιςτῆςΓαλατίας: Ankyra. Anadolu/Anatolia 32: 21–151. http://dergiler.ankara.edu.tr/dergiler/14/722/9120.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2017

  • Köprülü Bağbancı Ö (2007) Bursa Hanlar Bölgesi Değişim Ve Dönüşüm Sürecinin Incelenmesi ve Bölgenin Korunması Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Dissertation, Yıldız Technical University

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuban D (2001) İzmir’in Tarihsel Yapısının Özellikleri ve Koruması ile İlgili Rapor, Türkiye’de Kentsel Koruma; Kent Tarihleri ve Koruma Yöntemleri. Tarih Vakfı, İstanbul, pp 49–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuban D (2001) Türkiye’de Kentsel Koruma. Kent Tarihleri ve Koruma Yöntemleri, Tarih Vakfı, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Kültür Varlıkları ve Müzelere Genel Müdürlüğü (2018a) Kültür Varlıklarını Koruma Bölge Kurulu Müdürlükleri. http://www.kulturvarliklari.gov.tr/TR,43078/kultur-varliklarini-koruma-bolge-kurulu-mudurlukleri.html,%20accessed%20in%2010%20March%202018. Accessed 10 Mar 2018

  • Kültür Varlıkları ve Müzelere Genel Müdürlüğü (2018b) Türkiye Geneli Sit Alanları İstatistikleri. http://www.kulturvarliklari.gov.tr/TR,44973/turkiye-geneli-sit-alanlari-istatistikleri.html. Accessed 10 Mar 2018

  • Leblanc J, Poccardi G (1999) Etude de la permanence des tracés urbains et ruraux antiques à Antioche-sur-l’Oronte. Syria 76(1):91–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madran E (1996) Cumhuriyetin İlk Otuz Yılında (1920–1950) Koruma Alanının Örgütlenmesi-1. METU-JFA 16(1–2):59–97

    Google Scholar 

  • METU-TAÇDAM (Centre for Research and Assessment of Historic Environment) (2018a). TAÇDAM Publications. http://tacdam.metu.edu.tr/tacdam-publications. Accessed 30 Mar 2018

  • METU-TAÇDAM (Centre for Research and Assessment of Historic Environment) (2018b). Archaeological Research and Assessment for Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Crude Oil Pipeline Project. http://tacdam.metu.edu.tr/archaeological-research-and-assessment-baku-tbilisi-ceyhan-crude-oil-pipeline-project. Accessed 30 Mar 2018

  • Morey CR (1936) The excavation of antioch-on-the-Orontes. Proc Am Philos Soc 76(5):637–651

    Google Scholar 

  • Ökesli Saban D (2009) Hermann Jansen’s planning principles and his urban legacy in Adana. METU-JFA 26(2):45–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özdoğan M (2013) Dilemma in the archaeology of large scale development projects: a view from Turkey. Pap Inst Archaeol 23(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özdoğan M, Eres Z (2016) A view from Turkey on the Valletta and Faro conventions: effectiveness, problems and the state of Affairs. In: Florjanowicz P (ed), When Valletta meets Faro. The reality of European archaeology in the 21st century. EAC Occasional Paper No. 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Özyiğit Ö (1992) Kültür ve Tabiat Varlıklarını Koruma Yasası Üzerine. Ege Mimarlık 1992(3-4):22–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Şahin F (2015) Tepebağ Höyük, 2014–2015 Yılı Kazı Çalışmaları. 37. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı, 2.Cilt, 11–15 Mayıs 2015, Erzurum: 191–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Savacı Gökbulut Ö (2002) The design of spatio-temporal database model for representation of historical urban knowledge: an application for the city of Trabzon. Dissertation, Middle East Technical University

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagona A, Zimansky P (2009) Ancient Turkey. Routledge, Oxon

    Google Scholar 

  • Tankut G (1993) Bir Başkentin İmarı: Ankara (1929–1939). Anahtar Kitaplar, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Tankut G (2007) The Seljuk City. The Publications of the Faculty of Architecture, METU, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Taşcı B (2015) Çok Katmanlı Yerleşimlerin Koruma Sorunlarının Foça Örneği Üzerinden İrdelenmesi. Dissertation, Dokuz Eylül University

    Google Scholar 

  • Taşcı B, Akyüz Levi E (2016) Kent İçi Arkeolojik Alanlarda Kalıntıların Sunumuna İlişkin Yaklaşımlar: Foça Örneği. İdealKent 19(7):588–627

    Google Scholar 

  • TAY (2018a) The archaeological settlements of Turkey. http://tayproject.org/enghome.html. Accessed 1 Mar 2018

  • TAY (2018b) The archaeological settlements of Turkey—Destruction Report. http://tayproject.org/raporeng.html. Accessed 1 Mar 2018

  • The Ministry of Culture and Tourism (2018a) İlke Kararları (Resolutions). http://teftis.kulturturizm.gov.tr/TR,45465/36-nolu-ilke-karari-baraj-alanlarindan-etkilenen-tasinm-.html. Accessed 30 Mar 2018

  • The Ministry of Culture and Tourism (2018b) İlke Kararları (Resolutions). http://teftis.kulturturizm.gov.tr/yazdir?71A0CA146077058A3DFCD90DF1341B4A. Accessed 30 Mar 2018

  • TÜBA (2018), TÜBA-TÜKSEK Kültür Envanteri Projesi. http://www.tuba.gov.tr/tr/yayinlar/diger-yayinlar/tuksek-kultur-envanteri-projesi. Accessed 1 Mar 2018

  • Tuna N (1999a) Turkey. Report on the situation of urban archaeology in Europe. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, pp 217–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuna N (1999b) Batı Anadolu’da Geç Klasik dönem kentleşme hareketleri. International Symposium on Settlement and Housing in Anatolia through the Ages, Habitat II, June: 1996, Institute of Archaeology, İstanbul: 477–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuna N (2003) İstanbul Suriçi’nde kentsel arkeolojik kültür mirası, İstanbul Dergisi. Tarih Vakfı 46:88–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuna N (2016) Arkeolojik Değerlerin Kent Yaşamına Dahil Edilmesi: Tarsus Çalıştayı Üzerine Değerlendirme. In: Belge ZS, Belge B, Aydınoğlu Ü (eds) Arkeolojik Değerlerin Kent Yaşamına Dahil Edilmesi: Tarsus Çalıştayı, Mersin Üniversitesi-Kilikia Arkeolojisini Araştırma Merkezi (KAAM) Yayınları - 6, Mersin

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuna N, Belge B (2013), Antakya Tarihi Kenti’nin Kentsel Arkeolojik Kaynakları için Öntespit Çalışmaları ve Değerlendirme. 4.Tarih İçinde Mersin Kolokyumu-2011/Akdeniz Kentleri: Gelecek için Geçmişin Birikimi, Mersin

    Google Scholar 

  • Uggeri G (1998) The town planning of Antioch on the Orontes. J Ancient Topogr, n. VIII

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2018a) Properties inscribed on the world heritage list, Turkey. http://whc.unesco.org/en/statesparties/tr. Accessed 31 July 2018

  • UNESCO (2018b) Tentative lists. http://whc.unesco.org/en/statesparties/tr. Accessed 21 June 2018

  • UNESCO (2018c) Pergamon and its multi-layered cultural landscape. http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1457. Accessed 31 July 2018

  • Üstün F (2008) Tarihsel Kaynaklara Göre Sinop Şehrinin Fiziksel Gelişimi (Antik Dönemden 19. Yy. Sonuna Kadar). Dissertation, Karadeniz Technical University

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener-Müller W (2001) İstanbul’un Tarihsel Topografyası. Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams T (2015) Archaeology: reading the city through time. In: Bandarin F, van Oers R (eds) Reconnecting the city: the historic urban landscape approach and the future of urban heritage. Chicester, Wiley, pp 19–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerasimos S (2000) İstanbul. İmparatorluklar Başkenti, Tarih Vakfı, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Burak Belge .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Belge, B. (2019). Planning Challenges for Archaeological Heritage. In: Özdemir Sarı, Ö., Özdemir, S., Uzun, N. (eds) Urban and Regional Planning in Turkey. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05773-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics