Skip to main content

Muslim Brotherhood, Social Justice and Resentment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mimetic Theory and Islam
  • 156 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter analyzes the recent history of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB), in relation to the mimetic theme of resentment. MB is presented as an important case study because of its implications regarding the compatibility of political Islam with pluralistic democratic structures. A historical overview leads to the conclusion that the rise of MB in Egypt can be attributed to social resentment as its breeding ground. ‘Resentment’ as a philosophical theme is considered by Girard, drawing on Nietzsche and Scheler, but the picture is complicated by additional social and spiritual impulses. The theme of social justice is key; the writings of Qutb and Catholic Social Teaching both show elements of a vision of integral humanism. While the Nietzschean understanding of a necessary connection between religion and resentment is rejected, the temptation to dualism must be overcome by MB if a non-resentful participation within a pluralist society is to be realized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Muhammad M. Al-Hudaibi, 2000, The Principles of Politics in Islam (2nd ed.). Cairo, Egypt: Islamic Inc. Publishing and Distribution, p. 11.

  2. 2.

    As an example, take Ehrenfeld, Muslim Brotherhood (Ehrenfeld 2011).

  3. 3.

    The MB failed to establish the real democracy the rebellious movements were striving for and therefore was soon accused of being autocratic: see Monier and Ranko (2013, p. 120). In contrast to the Brotherhood, Salafism for the most part refuses democracy, as incompatible with Islam: see Lübben (2013, pp. 171, 174). Nevertheless Salafist political parties appeared after the 2011 revolution.

  4. 4.

    Bonhoeffer argues against compromise as well as radicalism. In the case of pragmatic compromise, ‘[t]he ultimate stays completely beyond daily life and in the end serves only as an eternal justification of all that exists’ (2005, p. 154). The alternative he gives is the way of Jesus, who as God entered into human existence. This means holding human existence in high esteem while criticizing its defective practice. Nevertheless I am using the term ‘compromise’ here to emphasize that we have to prepare the way of God within imperfect circumstances.

  5. 5.

    El-Hudaibi (2018); see Lübben (2013, pp. 166–167).

  6. 6.

    Monier and Ranko (2013) show that the el-Sisi government has immediately returned from a transnational Islamist project to pure nationalism in Egyptian politics.

References

  • Al-Hudaibi, Muhammad M. 2000. The Principles of Politics in Islam. 2nd ed, 11. Cairo, Egypt: Islamic Inc. Publishing and Distribution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonhoeffer, Dietrich. 2005. Ethics. Dietrich Bonhoeffer Works, Vol. 6. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, John. 2013. Sayyid Qutb and the Origins of Radical Islamism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damir-Geilsdorf, Sabine. 2003. Herrschaft und Gesellschaft. Der islamistische Wegbereiter Sayyid Qutb und seine Rezeption. Würzburg: Ergon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld, Rachel. 2011. The Muslim Brotherhood Evolution: An Overview. American Foreign Policy Interests 33: 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Hudaibi, Ma’mun. 2018. The Principles of the Muslim Brotherhood. http://www.ikhwanweb.com/article.php?id=813. Accessed 23 July 2018.

  • Guggenberger, Wilhelm. 2009. Radikale Transzendenz und politische Gewalt. Eine theologische Auseinandersetzung mit Sayyid Qutb. In Im Wettstreit um das Gute. Annäherungen an den Islam aus der Sicht der mimetischen Theorie, ed. Wilhelm Guggenberger and Wolfgang Palaver, 153–191. Münster, Hamburg, Berlin, Vienna, London, Zürich: LIT-Verlag (= Beiträge zur mimetischen Theorie, 25).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lübben, Ivesa. 2013. Auf dem Weg zum Gottesstaat? Zur politischen Partizipation von Islamisten am Beispiel Ägyptens nach Mubarak. In Der Arabische Frühling. Hintergründe und Analysen, ed. Thorsten Gerald Schneider, 163–180. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud, Hussein. 2011. Im Gespräch. Eine zivile Regierung so bald wie möglich. Interview mit Christiane Hoffmann. http://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/ausland/naher-osten/im-gespraech-hussein-mahmoud-eine-zivile-regierung-so-bald-wie-moeglich-1590240.html.

  • Monier, Elizabeth Iskander, and Annette Ranko. 2013. The Fall of the Muslim Brotherhood: Implications for Egypt. Middle East Policy 20 (4, Winter): 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1968. Genealogie der Moral. Kritische Gesamtausgabe VI, 2nd ed. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palaver, Wolfgang. 2013. René Girard’s Mimetic Theory, trans. Gabriel Borrud. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qutb, Sayyid. 1964. Milestones. Cedar Rapids, IA: The Mother Mosque Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Social Justice in Islam, trans. John B. Hardie, Translation Revised and Introduction by Hamid Algar. Oneonta, NY: Islamic Publications International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheler, Max. 1955. Das Ressentiment im Aufbau der Moralen. In Vom Umsturz der Werte. Abhandlungen und Aufsätze. Gesammelte Werke 3, 33–147. Bern: Francke Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wilhelm Guggenberger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Guggenberger, W. (2019). Muslim Brotherhood, Social Justice and Resentment. In: Kirwan, M., Achtar, A. (eds) Mimetic Theory and Islam. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05695-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics