Skip to main content

Mistakes in Imaging Interpretation of Traumatic and Non-traumatic Brain Emergencies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 811 Accesses

Abstract

The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines an error as an act that through ignorance, deficiency, or accident departs from or fails to achieve what should be done. Errors in medicine can arise from different causes including technical failure, perceptual problem, cognitive biases, system errors, etc., and mitigation of these errors requires a thorough understanding of the root causes in each scenario since it may be multifactorial. Errors in radiology are unique within the practice of medicine, since the missed imaging finding or misinterpretation of an imaging examination stays for posterity and can be accessed easily much later in time, unlike errors in clinical examinations that often are not accessible for investigation at a later time. They are also unique due to the inherent differences in the acquisition and interpretation of imaging examinations and are more prone toward perceptual and cognitive biases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pope JV, Edlow JA. Avoiding misdiagnosis in patients with neurological emergencies. Emerg Med Internat. 2012;2012:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pinto A, Reginelli A, Pinto F, et al. Errors in imaging patients in the emergency setting. Br J Radiol. 2016;89:20150914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Caranci F, Tedeschi E, Leone G, et al. Errors in neuroradiology. Radiol Med. 2015;120(9):795–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldstein JN, Camargo CA Jr, Pelletier AJ, et al. Headache in United States emergency departments: demographics, work-up and frequency of pathological diagnoses. Cephalalgia. 2006;26(6):684–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Edlow JA, Panagos PD, Godwin SA, et al. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with acute headache. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;52(4):407–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Edlow JA, Caplan LR. Avoiding pitfalls in the diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(1):29–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramirez-Lassepas M, Espinosa CE, Cicero JJ, et al. Predictors of intracranial pathologic findings in patients who seek emergency care because of headache. Arch Neurol. 1997;54:1506–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Linn FH, Wijdicks EF, van der Graff Y, et al. Prospective study of sentinel headache in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet. 1994;344:590–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Neil-Dwyer G, Lang D. Brain attack’ — aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: death due to delayed diagnosis. J R Coll Physicians. 1997;31:49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mayer PL, Awad IA, Todor R, et al. Misdiagnosis of symptomatic cerebral aneurysm: prevalence and correlation with outcome at four institutions. Stroke. 1996;27:1558–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kassell NF, Torner JC, Haley EC Jr, et al. The international cooperative study on the timing of aneurysm surgery. 1. Overall management results. J Neurosurg. 1990;73:18–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. van Gijn J, van Dongen KJ. The time course of aneurysmal haemorrhage on computed tomograms. Neuroradiology. 1982;23:153–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Morgenstern LB, Luna-Gonzales H, Huber JC Jr, et al. Worst headache and subarachnoid hemorrhage: prospective, modern computed tomography and spinal fluid analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 1998;32:297–304.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Van der Wee N, Rinkel GJ, Hasan D, et al. Detection of subarachnoid haemorrhage on early CT: is lumbar puncture still needed after a negative scan? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995;58:357–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Edlow JA, Rabinstein A, Traub SJ, et al. Diagnosis of reversible causes of coma. Lancet. 2014;384:2064–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liman TG, Bohner G, Heuschmann PU, et al. The clinical and radiological spectrum of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: the retrospective Berlin PRES study. J Neurol. 2012;259:155–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Roth C, Ferbert A. The posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: what’s certain, what’s new? Pract Neurol. 2011;11:136–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Itri JN, Patel SH. Heuristics and cognitive error in medical imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210(5):1097–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Alamoudi U, Al-Sayed AA, AlSallumi Y, et al. Acute calcific tendinitis of the longus colli muscle masquerading as a retropharyngeal abscess: a case report and review of the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;41:343–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zibis AH, Giannis D, Malizos KN, et al. Acute calcific tendinitis of the longus colli muscle: case report and review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(Suppl 3):S434–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bruno MA, Walker EA, Abujudeh HH. Understanding and confronting our mistakes: the epidemiology of error in radiology and strategies for error reduction. Radiographics. 2015;35(6):1668–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ratnaike TE, Hastie H, Gregson B, et al. The geometry of brain contusion: relationship between site of contusion and direction of injury. Br J Neurosurg. 2011;25(3):410–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee CS, Nagy PG, Weaver SJ, et al. Cognitive and system factors contributing to diagnostic errors in radiology. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(3):611–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Waite S, Scott J, Gale B, et al. Interpretive error in radiology. Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208(4):739–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Savage NM, Alleyne CH, Vender JR, et al. Dural-based metastatic carcinomas mimicking primary CNS neoplasia: report of 7 cases emphasizing the role of timely surgery and accurate pathologic evaluation. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2011;4(5):530–40.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Carrion DM, Carrion AF. Non-ketotic hyperglycemia hemichorea-hemiballismus and acute ischemic stroke. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;2013:bcr2012008359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wilson TJ, Than KD, Stetler WR, et al. Non-ketotic hyperglycemic chorea-hemiballismus mimicking basal ganglia hemorrhage. J Clin Neurosci. 2011;18(11):1560–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ashman CJ, Yu JS, Wolfman D. Satisfaction of search in osteoradiology. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175(2):541–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Provenzale JM, Kranz PG. Understanding errors in diagnostic radiology: proposal of a classification scheme and application to emergency radiology. Emerg Radiol. 2011;18(5):403–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science. 1974;185:1124–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gunderman RB. Biases in radiologic reasoning. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:561–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Block J, Funder DC. Social roles and social perception: individual differences in attribution and error. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51:1200–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Donald JJ, Barnard SA. Common patterns in 558 diagnostic radiology errors. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2012;56:173–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Quekel LG, Kessels AG, Goei R, van Engelshoven JM. Miss rate of lung cancer on the chest radiograph in clinical practice. Chest. 1999;115:720–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rosenkrantz AB, Bansal NK. Diagnostic errors in abdominopelvic CT interpretation: characterization based on report addenda. Abdom Radiol. 2016;41:1793–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Torres .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Torres, C., Zakhari, N., Rivas-Rodriguez, F., Guarnizo-Capera, A., Srinivasan, A., Nunez, D. (2019). Mistakes in Imaging Interpretation of Traumatic and Non-traumatic Brain Emergencies. In: Patlas, M., Katz, D., Scaglione, M. (eds) Errors in Emergency and Trauma Radiology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05548-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05548-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05547-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05548-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics