Abstract
It is well documented that individuals who are materially worse-off have poorer health and subjective wellbeing. Despite their limited means, we also know these same individuals can have complicated financial lives. However, it is not clear how individuals’ strategies for managing their wealth impact on broader aspects of their wellbeing. In this chapter we draw on a recently-completed project that used a combination of innovative methodologies – financial diaries, qualitative interviews and Q methodology – to examine whether there is a perceived link, negative or positive, between the use of ‘fair finance’ initiatives aimed at low-income populations in Scotland and health and wellbeing, and the mediating mechanisms that might facilitate, or militate against, this association. Illustrative examples from the data are provided and we reflect on the success of employing these methodologies. Gaining in-depth insight into individuals’ financial lives and links to wellbeing has potential implications for product development and wider health and social policy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Although these terms are often used interchangeably for the purposes of this chapter we will only refer to microcredit.
- 2.
A conceptual basis for this relationship in developing countries was outlined in Mohindra and Haddad (2005).
- 3.
All names have been changed in order to maintain confidentiality.
References
Affleck, A., & Mellor, M. (2006). Community development finance: A NeoMarket solution to social exclusion? Journal of Social Policy, 35, 303–319.
Al-Janabi, H., Flynn, T., & Coast, J. (2012). Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: The ICECAP-A. Quality of Life Research, 21, 167–176.
Armendariz, B., & Morduch, J. (2010). The economics of microfinance. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.
Baker, R., Thompson, C., & Mannion, R. (2006). Q methodology in health economics. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 11, 38–45.
Banerjee, A., & Duflo, E. (2011). Poor economics: A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty. New York: PublicAffairs.
Banerjee, A., Karlan, D., & Zinman, J. (2015). Six randomized evaluations of microcredit: Introduction and further steps. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7, 1–21.
Barrett, C. B., & Carter, M. R. (2010). The power and pitfalls of experiments in development economics: Some non-random reflections. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 32, 515–548.
Bédécarrats, F., Baur, S., & Lapenu, C. (2012). Combining social and financial performance: A paradox? Enterprise Development and Microfinance, 23, 241–258.
Bédécarrats, F., Guérin, I., & Roubaud, F. (2017). All that glitters is not gold. The political economy of randomized evaluations in development. Development and Change. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12378.
Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. London: Yale University Press.
Brown, L., Campbell-Jack, D., Gray, L., Hovald, P., Kirkpatrick, G., & Knudsen, L., et al. (2016). The Scottish health survey. 2015 edition. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
Cartwright, N. (2007). Are RCTs the gold standard? BioSocieties, 2, 11–20.
Cartwright, N. (2011). A philosopher’s view of the long road from RCTs to effectiveness. The Lancet, 377, 1400–1401.
Chamberlain, E. C., Rutherford, M. B., & Gibeau, M. L. (2012). Human perspectives and conservation of grizzly bears in Banff National Park, Canada. Conservation Biology, 26, 420–431.
Collins, D., Morduch, J., Rutherford, S., & Ruthven, O. (2009). Portfolios of the poor: How the world’s poor live on $2 a day. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1984). How people organize the political world: A schematic model. American Journal of Political Science, 28, 95–126.
Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., & Petticrew, M. (2008). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance. British Medical Journal, 337, 979–983.
Cuppen, E., Breukers, S., Hisschemöller, M., & Bergsma, E. (2010). Q methodology to select participants for a stakeholder dialogue on energy option from biomass in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 69, 579–591.
Dahlgren, G., & Whitehead, M. (1991). Policies and strategies to promote social equity in health. Background document to WHO - strategy paper for Europe. Arbetsrapport 2007:14. Institute for Futures Studies.
de Graaf, G., & van Exel, J. (2009). Using Q methodology in administrative ethics. Public Integrity, 11, 63–78.
Deaton, A. (1992). Understanding consumption. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deaton, A. (2010). Instruments, randomization, and learning about development. Journal of Economic Literature, 48, 424–455.
Douglas, M. (2016). Beyond ‘health’: Why don’t we tackle the cause of health inequalities? In K. E. Smith, C. Bambra, & S. E. Hill (Eds.), Health inequalities: Critical perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eble, A., Boone, P., & Elbourne, D. (2013). Risk and evidence of bias in randomized controlled trials in economics (January 6, 2014). Mimeo: Brown University.
Enkin, M. W. (2000). For and against clinical equipoise and not the uncertainty principle is the moral underpinning of the randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 321, 756–758.
Graham, H. (2009). Health inequalities, social determinants and public health policy. Policy & Politics, 37, 463–479.
Jeffares, S. (2014). Interpreting hashtag politics: Policy ideas in an era of social media. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jones, A. M., & Wildman, J. (2008). Health, income and relative deprivation: Evidence from the BHPS. Journal of Health Economics, 27, 308–324.
Kuhn, U., & Brulé, G. (2018). Buffering effects for negative life events: The role of material, social, religious and personal resources. Journal of Happiness Studies.
Ledgerwood, J. (2013). The new microfinance handbook: A financial market system perspective. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Lenton, P., & Mosley, P. (2012). Financial exclusion and the poverty trap: Overcoming deprivation in the inner city. London/New York: Routledge.
Macaulay, B., Mazzei, M., Roy, M. J., Teasdale, S., & Donaldson, C. (2018). Differentiating the effect of social enterprise activities on health. Social Science & Medicine, 200, 211–217.
Macintyre, A., Ferris, D., Gonçalves, B., & Quinn, N. (2018). What has economics got to do with it? The impact of socioeconomic factors on mental health and the case for collective action. Palgrave Communications, 4, 1–5.
Marmot, M. (2010). Fair society: Healthy lives. Strategic review of health inequalities in England post-2010. London: The Marmot Review.
Mattson, D. J., Byrd, K. L., Rutherford, M. B., Brown, S. R., & Clark, T. W. (2006). Finding common ground in large carnivore conservation: Mapping contending perspectives. Environmental Science & Policy, 9, 392–405.
Mattson, D. J., Clark, S. G., Byrd, K. L., Brown, S. R., & Robinson, B. (2011). Leaders’ perspectives in the Yellowstone to Yukon conservation initiative. Political Science, 44, 103–133.
McCartney, G., Collins, C., Walsh, D., & Batty, G. (2012). Why the scots die younger: Synthesizing the evidence. Public Health, 126, 459–470.
McHugh, N., Gillespie, M., Loew, J., & Donaldson, C. (2014). First steps towards self-employment – Microcredit for enterprise in Scotland. Scottish Affairs, 23, 169–191.
McHugh, N., Baker, R. M., Mason, H., Williamson, L., van Exel, J., Deogaonkar, R., et al. (2015). Extending life for people with a terminal illness: A moral right and an expensive death? Exploring societal perspectives. BMC Medical Ethics, 16, 1–15.
McHugh, N., Biosca, O., & Donaldson, C. (2017). From wealth to health: Evaluating microfinance as a complex intervention. Evaluation, 23, 209–225.
McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. (2013). Q methodology. Newbury Park: Sage.
Mohindra, K. S., & Haddad, S. (2005). Women’s interlaced freedoms: A framework linking microcredit participation and health. Journal of Human Development, 6, 353–374.
Morduch, J., & Schneider, R. (2017). The financial diaries: How American families cope in a world of uncertainty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nicholson, B., & Dayson, K. (2010). In GHK Consulting (Ed.), Evaluation of Community Development Finance Institutions (CDFIs) (pp. 1–233). Birmingham: Department for Business Innovation & Skills, Cabinet Office.
Pavot, W. G., Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 149–161.
Petticrew, M. (2011). When are complex interventions ‘complex’? When are simple interventions ‘simple’? The European Journal of Public Health, 21, 397–398.
Responsible Finance. (2017). Responsible Finance: The industry in 2016. Responsible Finance, London.
Roy, M. J., Baker, R., & Kerr, S. (2016). Conceptualising the public health role of actors operating outside of formal health systems: The case of social enterprise. Social Science and Medicine, 172, 144–152.
Shaffer, P. (2011). Against excessive rhetoric in impact assessment: Overstating the case for randomised controlled experiments. Journal of Development Studies, 47, 1619–1635.
Shaw, M., Dorling, D., & Smith, G. D. (2006). Poverty, social exclusion, and minorities. In M. Marmot & R. G. Wilkinson (Eds.), Social determinants of health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stephenson, W. (1953). The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Thomson, H., Hoskins, R., Petticrew, M., Ogilvie, D., Craig, N., Quinn, T., et al. (2004). Evaluating the health effects of social interventions. British Medical Journal, 328, 282–285.
van Exel, J., Baker, R., Mason, H., Donaldson, C., & Brouwer, W. (2015). Public views on principles for health care priority setting: Findings of a European cross-country study using Q methodology. Social Science & Medicine, 126, 128–137.
Walsh, D., Bendel, N., Jones, R., & Hanlon, P. (2010). Investigating a ‘Glasgow effect’: Why do equally deprived UK cities experience different health outcomes? Glasgow: Glasgow Centre for Population Health.
Walsh, D., McCartney, G., Collins, C., Taulbut, M., & Batty, G. D. (2016). History, politics and vulnerability: Explaining excess mortality in Scotland and Glasgow. Glasgow: Glasgow Centre for Population Health.
Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2005). The subjective experience of partnership love: A Q methodological study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 85–107.
Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2012). Doing Q methodological research – Theory method and interpretation. London: Sage.
Whitehead, M. (2007). A typology of actions to tackle social inequalities in health. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61, 473–478.
Whitehead, M., & Popay, J. (2010). Swimming upstream? Taking action on the social determinants of health inequalities. Social Science & Medicine, 71, 1234–1236.
Whyte, B., & Ajetunmobi, T. (2012). Still “the sick man of Europe”?: Scottish mortality in a European context 1950–2010, an analysis of comparative mortality trends. Glasgow: Glasgow Centre for Population Health.
Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Allen Lane.
Worrall, J. (2007). Evidence in medicine and evidence-based medicine. Philosophy Compass, 2, 981–1022.
Funding
This work was funded by Chief Scientist Office (CSO) Scotland (project reference number CZH/4/1095).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McHugh, N., Biosca, O., Baker, R., Ibrahim, F., Donaldson, C. (2019). Innovating on Methods to Understand the Relationship Between Finances and Wellbeing. In: Brulé, G., Suter, C. (eds) Wealth(s) and Subjective Well-Being. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 76. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05535-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05535-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05534-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05535-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)