Skip to main content

Hidden Power Shifts: Multilevel Governance and Interstitial Institutional Change in Europe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Configurations, Dynamics and Mechanisms of Multilevel Governance

Part of the book series: Comparative Territorial Politics ((COMPTPOL))

Abstract

The chapter focuses on how multilevel governance affects interstitial institutional change in decision-making in the EU. Interstitial institutional change occurs if formal institutional rules are ambiguous, and in consequence, when applied, are renegotiated by actors. Each concerned actor seeks to strengthen its own institutional power in these renegotiations in order to influence policy outcomes. This leads to an informal institutional change between formal treaty revisions. Héritier argues that MLG and multi-arena governance offer additional opportunities for actors to strengthen their institutional powers in the re-negotiation of incomplete formal rules during implementation, but may also set limits to such endeavours. The chapter analyses in three cases of European politics, the nomination and investiture of the Commission President, the nomination and investiture of individual Commissioners and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations, the conditions in which multilevel and multi-arena strategies of the European Parliament bring about an informal interstitial institutional change. All these cases imply a power shift between European institutional actors in favour of the parliament.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Authors share similar assumptions of rational behaviour to explain the empowerment of the EP. However, their work focuses exclusively on the role of member states in the shaping of formal treaty rules. By contrast, we focus on the role of the EP in changing formal and informal institutional rules.

  2. 2.

    Assuming bounded rationality implies that when actors design institutional rules (contracts), they are unable to take into account every relevant contingency. Decisions are time-consuming and costly.

  3. 3.

    An arena is a formal decision-making setting with its formally competent decision-makers deciding on an issue or a number of issues at a specific point in time. In our cases we focus on a treaty shaping arena and an intergovernmental arena. In other work we focused on legislative arenas deciding under co-decision on legislative issues.

  4. 4.

    This Section is based on Héritier et al. (2018).

  5. 5.

    The Eurosceptic right-wing Euro-parties, the Alliance of European Conservatives and Reformists (AECR) and the Movement for a Europe of Liberties and Democracy did not nominate any candidate.

  6. 6.

    This section is based on Hériter et al. (2018).

References

  • Barroso, J. M. D. (2012). State of the Union (2012): José Manuel Durão Barroso, President of the European Commission. State of the Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A. (1989). Intergovernmental Relations in the 1980s. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 19(4), 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A. (1992). Politik in Mehrebenensystemen. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A. (2009). Politik in Mehrebenensystemen. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A. (2016). Constitutional Policy in Multilevel Government: The Art on Keeping the Balance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A., Scharpf, F. W., & Zintl, R. (1992). Horizontale Politikverflechtung. Zur Theorie von Verhandlungssystemen. Frankfurt and New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, J. (2014). EU Ombudsman Demands More TTIP Transparency. http://www.euractiv.com/sections/trade-industry/eu-ombudsman-demands-more-ttip-transparency-303831. Accessed 9 March 2015.

  • Dinan, D. (2014). Governance and Institutions: The Unrelenting Rise of the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(S1), 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1989). Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • EP. (2015a). European Parliament Resolution of 8 July 2015 Containing the European Parliament’s Recommendations to the European Commission on the Negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P8-TA-2015-0252+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN. Accessed 4 October 2016.

  • EP. (2015b). All MEPs to Have Access to All Confidential TTIP Documents. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=IM-PRESS&reference=20151202IPR05759&language=EN&format=XML. Accessed 4 October 2016.

  • Farrell, H., & Héritier, A. (2003). Formal and Informal Institutions Under Codecision: Continuous Constitution Building in Europe. Governance, 16(4), 577–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, H., & Héritier, A. (2004). Interorganizational Negotiation and Intraorganizational Power in Shared Decision Making: Early Agreements Under Codecision and Their Impact on the European Parliament and Council. Comparative Political Studies, 37(10), 1184–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, H., & Héritier, A. (2005). A Rationalist-Institutionalist Explanation of Endogenous Regional Integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(2), 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, H., & Héritier, A. (2007a). Introduction: Contested Competences in the European Union. West European Politics, 30(2), 227–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, H., & Héritier, A. (2007b). Codecision and Institutional Change. West European Politics, 30(2), 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, A. (2007). Explaining Institutional Change in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, A. (2008). Causal Explanation. In D. della Porta & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective (pp. 61–80). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, A., Meissner, K. L., Moury, C., Schoeller, M. (2018). Parliamentarisation from the Top? Success and Failure in Empowering the European Parliament.

    Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, A., Moury, C., Schoeller, M., Meissner, K. L., & Mota, I. (2015). The European Parliament as a Driving Force of Constitutionalisation. Brussels: European Parliament.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobolt, S. B. (2014). A Vote for the President? The Role of Spitzenkandidaten in the 2014 European Parliament Elections. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(10), 1528–1540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Interview 1_ET. (2015, February 2). European Commission. Brussels, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview 11_ET. (2015, February 26). European Parliament. Brussels, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview 12_ET. (2015, February 27). European Parliament. Brussels, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview 13_ET. (2015, February 27). European Commission. Brussels, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview 14_ET. (2015 February 27). European Commission. Brussels, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, F. (1995). The European Parliaments Role in Nominating the Members of the Commission: First Steps Towards Parliamentary Government or Us Senate-Type Confirmation Hearings. http://aei.pitt.edu/6950/. Accessed 6 November 2017.

  • Knight, J. (1995). Models, Interpretations and Theories: Constructing Explanations of Institutional Emergence and Change. In J. Knight & I. Sened (Eds.), Explaining Social Institutions (pp. 95–120). Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, D. A., & Powell, R. (1999). Strategic Choice and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, D. R., & Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. F. (1953). Two-Person Cooperative Games. Econometrica, 21, 128–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, N. (2001). The European Commission. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ombudsman. (2014). Decision of the European Ombudsman Closing Her Own-Initiative Inquiry OI/10/2014/RA Concerning the European Commission. http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/cases/decision.faces/en/58668/html.bookmark. Accessed 4 October 2016.

  • Ombudsman. (2015). Decision of the European Ombudsman Closing the Inquiry into Complaint 119/2015/PHP on the European Commission’s Handling of a Request for Public Access to Documents Related to TTIP. http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/cases/decision.faces/en/61261/html.bookmark. Accessed 4 October 2016.

  • Peterson, J. (2017). Juncker’s Political European Commission and an EU in Crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(2), 349–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, J., & Rittberger, B. (2003). Dynamics of Formal and Informal Institutional Change in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(6), 858–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrienne Héritier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Héritier, A. (2019). Hidden Power Shifts: Multilevel Governance and Interstitial Institutional Change in Europe. In: Behnke, N., Broschek, J., Sonnicksen, J. (eds) Configurations, Dynamics and Mechanisms of Multilevel Governance. Comparative Territorial Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05511-0_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics