Skip to main content

Innovation and Team Collaboration in Neurosurgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethics of Innovation in Neurosurgery
  • 330 Accesses

Abstract

Technical developments and medical innovations have made healthcare increasingly more complex over the past few decades, putting ever so much more emphasis on teamwork. Optimal functioning of healthcare teams is important to ensure adequate and safe treatment of patients but also to create a working environment where promising innovations can be initiated and implemented effectively in order to improve patient care. This chapter will discuss human and organizational factors behind team collaboration that contribute to successful innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human. Building a safer health care system. Washington D.C.: Institute of Medicine; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andel C, Davidow SL, Hollander M, Moreno DA. The economics of health care quality and medical errors. J Health Care Finance. 2012;39(1):39–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wagner C, Smits M, van Wagtendonk I, Zwaan L, Lubberding S, Merten H, Timmermans DRM. Oorzaken van incidenten en onbedoelde schade in ziekenhuizen. Een systematische analyse met PRISMA op afdelingen Spoedeisende Hulp (SEH), chirurgie en interne geneeskunde. [Causes of incidents and unwanted damage in hospitals. A systematic analysis with PRISMA on emergency, surgery and internal medicine departments]. EMGO Instituut en NIVEL; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wong BM, Ackroyd-Stolarz S, Bukowskyj M, Calder L, Ginzburg A, Microys S, et al. The CanMEDS 2015 patient safety and quality improvement expert working group report. Ottawa; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Snyder J, Schultz L, Walbert T. The role of tumor board conferences in neuro-oncology: a nationwide provider survey. J Neuro-Oncol. 2017;133(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gayed BA, Youssef R, Darwish O, Kapur P, Bagrodia A, Brugarolas J, et al. Multi-disciplinary surgical approach to the management of patients with renal cell carcinoma with venous tumor thrombus: 15 year experience and lessons learned. BMC Urol. 2016;16(1):43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cypko MA, Stoehr M, Kozniewski M, Druzdzel MJ, Dietz A, Berliner L, et al. Validation workflow for a clinical Bayesian network model in multidisciplinary decision making in head and neck oncology treatment. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017;12(11):1959–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lamb BW, Sevdalis N, Benn J, Vincent C, Green JS. Multidisciplinary cancer team meeting structure and treatment decisions: a prospective correlational study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(3):715–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson SB, Little TD, Masyn K, Mehta PD, Ghazarian SR. Multidisciplinary design and analytic approaches to advance prospective research on the multilevel determinants of child health. Ann Epidemiol. 2017;27(6):361–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hewett DG, Watson BM, Gallois C, Ward M, Leggett BA. Intergroup communication between hospital doctors: implications for quality of patient care. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(12):1732–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Manser T. Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53(2):143–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Taplin SH, Weaver S, Salas E, Chollette V, Edwards HM, Bruinooge SS, et al. Reviewing cancer care team effectiveness. J Oncol Pract. 2015;11(3):239–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Madrid HP, Totterdell P, Niven K. Does leader-affective presence influence communication of creative ideas within work teams? Emotion. 2016;16(6):798–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hollenbeck JR, Beersma B, Schouten ME. Beyond team types and taxonomies: a dimensional scaling conceptualization for team description. Acad Manag Rev. 2012;37(1):82–106.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weller J, Boyd M, Cumin D. Teams, tribes and patient safety: overcoming barriers to effective teamwork in healthcare. Postgrad Med J. 2014;90(1061):149–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. West MA, Lyubovnikova J. Illusion of team working in health care. J Health Organ Manag. 2013;27(1):134–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hulsheger UR, Anderson N, Salgado JF. Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(5):1128–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saskia M. Peerdeman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Peerdeman, S.M. (2019). Innovation and Team Collaboration in Neurosurgery. In: Broekman, M. (eds) Ethics of Innovation in Neurosurgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05502-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05502-8_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05501-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05502-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics