Abstract
This chapter looks at crucial assumptions underpinning this book and provides new perspectives for future M&A research. Recognizing the importance of recent trends including globalization and global programs of cross-border acquisitions, this chapter builds upon and looks beyond what has already been elaborated. Combining the themes of CSR and non-Western acquirers, this chapter delves into some of the fundamental theoretical starting points touched upon earlier. It argues that the book represents a strategic, actionable outlook on M&As, and thereby outlines novel ways of engaging with the world through M&As. It also proposes a framework and suggests innovative directions and a research agenda for future M&A research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2013). Generating research questions. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247–271.
Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility. The good, the bad, and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51–79.
Bauer, F., Schriber, S., Degischer, D., & King, D. R. (2018). Contextualizing speed and cross-border acquisition performance: Labor market flexibility and efficiency effects. Journal of World Business. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2018.01.001
Birkinshaw, J., Bresman, H., & Håkanson, L. (2000). Managing the post-acquisition integration process: How the human integration and task integration processes interact to foster value creation. Journal of Management Studies, 37(3), 395–425.
Björkman, I., Fey, C. F., & Park, H. J. (2007). Institutional theory and MNC subsidiary HRM practices: Evidence from a three-country study. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(3), 430–446.
Campbell, J. T., Sirmon, D. G., & Schijven, M. (2016). Fuzzy logic and the market: A configurational approach to investor perceptions of acquisition announcements. Academy of Management Journal, 59(1), 163–187.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.
Freeman, R. E. (1999). Response: Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 233–236.
Froese, F. J., Pak, Y. S., & Chong, L. C. (2008). Managing the human side of cross-border acquisitions in South Korea. Journal of World Business, 43(1), 97–108.
Gilbert, D. R. (1996). Ethics through corporate strategy. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Graebner, M. E. (2009). Caveat venditor: Trust asymmetries in acquisitions of entrepreneurial firms. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 435–472.
Graebner, M. E., Heimeriks, K. H., Huy, Q. N., & Vaara, E. (2017). The process of postmerger integration: A review and agenda for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 1–32.
Greenwood, R., & Miller, D. (2010). Tackling design anew: Getting back to the heart of organizational theory. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(4), 78–88.
Haleblian, J., Devers, C. E., McNamara, G., Carpenter, M. A., & Davison, R. B. (2009). Taking stock of what we know about mergers and acquisitions: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 35(3), 469–502.
Harwood, I. (2006). Confidentiality constraints within mergers and acquisitions: Gaining insights through a “bubble” metaphor. British Journal of Management, 17(4), 347–359.
Jemison, D. B., & Sitkin, S. B. (1986). Corporate acquisitions: A process perspective. Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 145–163.
Jensen, M. C. (2000). Value maximization and the corporate objective function. In M. Beer & N. Nohria (Eds.), Breaking the code of change (pp. 35–57). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Jensen, T., & Sandström, J. (2011). Stakeholder theory and globalization: The challenges of power and responsibility. Organization Studies, 32(4), 473–488.
Jensen, T., & Sandström, J. (2013). In defense of stakeholder pragmatism. Journal of Business Ethics, 2(2), 225–237.
King, D. R., Bauer, F., & Schriber, S. (2018). The state of the art of M&A research. London: Routledge.
Kling, G., Ghobadian, A., Hitt, M. A., Weitzel, U., & O’Regan, N. (2014). The effects of cross-border and cross-industry mergers and acquisitions on home-region and global multinational enterprises. British Journal of Management, 25, 116–132.
Krug, J. A., & Hegarty, H. W. (1997). Postacquisition turnover among U.S. top management teams: An analysis of the effects of foreign vs. domestic acquisitions of U.S. targets. Strategic Management Journal, 18(8), 667–675.
Laamanen, T., & Keil, T. (2008). Performance of serial acquirers: Toward an acquisition program perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 663–672.
Larsson, R., & Finkelstein, S. (1999). Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: A case survey of synergy realization. Organization Science, 10(1), 1–26.
Meglio, O., & Risberg, A. (2010). Mergers and acquisitions: Time for a methodological rejuvenation of the field? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(1), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2009.11.002
Öberg, C. (2014). Customer relationship challenges following international acquisitions. International Marketing Review, 31(3), 259–282.
Pablo, A. L., Sitkin, S. B., & Jemison, D. B. (1996). Acquisition decision-making processes: The central role of risk. Journal of Management, 22(5), 723–746.
Parvinen, P., & Tikkanen, H. (2007). Incentive asymmetries in the mergers and acquisitions process. Journal of Management Studies, 44(5), 759–787. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00698.x
Rabbiosi, L., Elia, S., & Bertoni, F. (2012). Acquisitions by EMNCs in developed markets: An organisational learning perspective. Management International Review, 52(2), 193–212.
Roll, R. (1986). The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of Business, 2(1), 197–216.
Rugman, A. M., Kirton, J. J., Soloway, J. A., & Soloway, J. A. (1999). Environmental regulations and corporate strategy: A NAFTA perspective. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Schriber, S. (2016). Toward a competitive dynamics perspective on value potential in M&A. In A. Risberg, D. K. King, & O. Meglio (Eds.), The Routledge companion to mergers and acquisitions. Oxon: Routledge.
Shrivastava, P. (1986). Postmerger integration. Journal of Business Strategy, 7(1), 65–76.
Vaara, E., Sarala, R., Stahl, G. K., & Björkman, I. (2012). The impact of organizational and national cultural differences on social conflict and knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1), 1–27.
Vaara, E., Tienari, J., Piekkari, R., & Säntti, R. (2005). Language and the circuits of power in a merging multinational corporation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(3), 595–623.
Vaara, E., & Whittington, R. (2012). Strategy-as-practice: Taking social practices seriously. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 285–336.
Valentini, G., & Di Guardo, M. C. (2012). M&A and the profile of inventive activity. Strategic Organization, 10(4), 384–405.
Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskinsson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. (2005). Guest editors’ introduction strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 1–33.
Zollo, M. (2009). Superstitious learning with rare strategic decisions: Theory and evidence from corporate acquisitions. Organization Science, 20(5), 894–908.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schriber, S. (2019). Onwards and Upwards: Broadened and Deepened Perspectives on M&As. In: Strategic Decisions and Sustainability Choices. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05478-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05478-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05477-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05478-6
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)