Skip to main content

Comparative Quantitative Evaluation of Distributed Methods for Explanation Generation and Validation of Floor Plan Recommendations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11352))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this work, we compare different explanation generation and validation methods for semantic search pattern-based retrieval results returned by a case-based framework for support of early conceptual design phases in architecture. Compared methods include two case- and rule-based explanation engines, the third one is the discriminant analysis-based method for explanation and validation prediction and estimation. All of the explanation methods use the same data set for retrieval and subsequent explainability operations for results. We describe the main structure of each method and evaluate their quantitative validation performance against each other. The goal of this work is to examine which method performs better under which circumstances, at which point in time, and how good the potential explanation ant its validation can be predicted in general. To evaluate these issues, we compare not only the general performance, i.e., the average rate of valid explanations but also how the validation rate changes over time using a number of time steps for this comparison. We also show for which search pattern type which methods perform better.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://ksd.ai.ar.tum.de/?page_id=240&lang=en.

References

  1. Ayzenshtadt, V., Espinoza-Stapelfeld, C.A., Langenhahn, C., Althoff, K.D.: Multi-agent-based generation of explanations for retrieval results within a case-based support framework for architectural design. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence. International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART-18), Scitepress (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aamodt, A.: Explanation-driven case-based reasoning. In: Wess, S., Althoff, K.-D., Richter, M.M. (eds.) EWCBR 1993. LNCS, vol. 837, pp. 274–288. Springer, Heidelberg (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58330-0_93

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Roth-Berghofer, T.R.: Explanations and case-based reasoning: foundational issues. In: Funk, P., González Calero, P.A. (eds.) ECCBR 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3155, pp. 195–209. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28631-8_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Cassens, J., Kofod-Petersen, A.: Designing explanation aware systems: the quest for explanation patterns. In: ExaCt, pp. 20–27 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Broekens, J., Harbers, M., Hindriks, K., van den Bosch, K., Jonker, C., Meyer, J.-J.: Do you get it? user-evaluated explainable BDI agents. In: Dix, J., Witteveen, C. (eds.) MATES 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6251, pp. 28–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16178-0_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Harbers, M., van den Bosch, K., Meyer, J.J.: Design and evaluation of explainable BDI agents. In: 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT), vol. 2, pp. 125–132. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Voss, A.: Case design specialists in FABEL. In: Issues and Applications of Case-Based Reasoning in Design, pp. 301–335 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Oxman, R., Oxman, R.: Precedents: memory structure in design case libraries. In: CAAD Futures. vol. 93, pp. 273–287 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Flemming, U.: Case-based design in the SEED system. Autom. Constr. 3, 123–133 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lai, I.C.: Dynamic idea maps: a framework for linking ideas with cases during brainstorming. Int. J. Architectural Comput. 3, 429–447 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin, C.J.: Visual architectural topology. In: Open Systems: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, pp. 3–12 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Inanc, B.S.: Casebook. an information retrieval system for housing floor plans. In: The Proceedings of 5th Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research (CAADRIA), pp. 389–398 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Richter, K., Heylighen, A., Donath, D.: Looking back to the future-an updated case base of case-based design tools for architecture. In: Knowledge Modelling-eCAADe (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Richter, K.: Augmenting Designers’ Memory: Case-based Reasoning in Architecture. Logos-Verlag, Berlin (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Richter, K.: What a shame-why good ideas can’t make it in architecture: a contemporary approach towards the case-based reasoning paradigm in architecture. In: FLAIRS Conference (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sabri, Q.U., Bayer, J., Ayzenshtadt, V., Bukhari, S.S., Althoff, K.D., Dengel, A.: Semantic pattern-based retrieval of architectural floor plans with case-based and graph-based searching techniques and their evaluation and visualization. In: ICPRAM, pp. 50–60 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ayzenshtadt, V., et al.: Comparative evaluation of rule-based and case-based retrieval coordination for search of architectural building designs. In: Goel, A., Díaz-Agudo, M.B., Roth-Berghofer, T. (eds.) ICCBR 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9969, pp. 16–31. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47096-2_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Jackson, M.: Problem analysis using small problem frames. S. Afr. Comput. J. 47–60 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Espinoza, C.: Case-based classification of explanation expressions in search results of a retrieval system for Support of the early conceptual design phase in architecture. Bachelor Thesis. University of Hildesheim (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bayer, J., et al.: Migrating the classical pen-and-paper based conceptual sketching of architecture plans towards computer tools - prototype design and evaluation. In: Lamiroy, B., Dueire Lins, R. (eds.) GREC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9657, pp. 47–59. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52159-6_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viktor Eisenstadt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Espinoza-Stapelfeld, C., Eisenstadt, V., Althoff, KD. (2019). Comparative Quantitative Evaluation of Distributed Methods for Explanation Generation and Validation of Floor Plan Recommendations. In: van den Herik, J., Rocha, A. (eds) Agents and Artificial Intelligence. ICAART 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11352. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05453-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05453-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05452-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05453-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics