Skip to main content

Keeping It Real: Literary Impersonality Under Neoliberalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
World Literature, Neoliberalism, and the Culture of Discontent

Part of the book series: New Comparisons in World Literature ((NCWL))

Abstract

This chapter argues that the impersonality of historical capitalism is best conceived as an uneven combination of socio-cultural processes of depersonalization and (re-)personalization. It is within this purview of the longue durée that I shall locate the specific configuration of impersonal and personal forces in the period known as ‘neoliberalism.’ I shall argue that neoliberalism constitutes a combined and uneven world-systemic project operating through multiple socio-cultural “personae” (from homo œconomicus to “wageless life” [Denning]), unified by a counter-revolutionary project of Restoration whose aim was to negate the “passion for the real” [la passion du réel] that characterized much of the twentieth century (Badiou). I shall use these extended sociological and philosophical elaborations as a framework within which to read two key contemporary works of world-literature: S. J. Naudé’s The Alphabet of Birds (2015) and Rachel Kushner’s The Flamethrowers (2013). I interpret these works as attempts to inherit the “passion for the real” under conditions of neoliberalism. Both writers employ techniques of impersonality and depersonalization to carve out a fragile space of resistance and formalize hope in an ethico-political absolute. In doing so, they not only extend Badiou’s own reflections on the intrinsic limitations of the “passion for the real” (not least its intimate bond with violence and destruction) but also indicate potential blind spots in Badiou’s philosophical project itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I am grateful to Stephen Shapiro for his comments on a previous version of this article. All remaining errors are my own.

  2. 2.

    The translation is taken from Friedrich (1974: 8–9).

  3. 3.

    Jameson mistakenly transcribes Friedrich’s term as “Entpersonalisierung” (2002: 131).

  4. 4.

    Cinzia Arruzza (2014) has put this point differently, criticising Wood’s too-sharp distinction between the “logic” and “history” of capitalism: “as soon as we accept [Wood’s] distinction between the logical structure of capital and its historical dimensions, we can then accept the idea that the extraction of surplus-value takes place within the framework of relations between formally free and equal individuals without presupposing differences in juridical and political status. But we can do this only at a very high level of abstraction—that is to say, at the level of the logical structure. From the point of view of concrete history, things change radically.”

  5. 5.

    On the person as dispositif, see Esposito (2012).

  6. 6.

    I am here condensing ideas found, among others, in Jodi Dean’s (2016) theory of interpellation as enclosure; James Scott’s (1998) work on the state construction of “legibility and simplification;” and Jason W. Moore’s (2015) notion of “abstract social nature.” It is also inspired by Marx’s writings on wood theft, on which see Hartley (2017).

  7. 7.

    For a clear historical example, see Chakrabarty (1989) on the jute mill workers of Calcutta.

  8. 8.

    This argument is challenged by Dardot and Laval (2013: 262).

  9. 9.

    What follows is an abbreviated reconstruction of arguments put forth in Badiou (2009, 2014). Badiou is not alone in this somewhat bizarre-sounding diagnosis: it can also be found in Franck Fischbach (2016) and Gopal Balakrishnan (2009: 26).

  10. 10.

    Badiou (2008a: 35–6) identifies two modern sequences of the communist hypothesis: 1789–1871 and 1917–1976, within which 1966–1975 constitutes something like a sub-sequence.

  11. 11.

    I am drawing here on Noys (2010: 146–7).

  12. 12.

    As Alberto Toscano observes, “it is a passion that inhabits its subjects as what is in themselves more than themselves” (Badiou 2007: 220, n. 32).

  13. 13.

    By “reactive subject” Badiou (2009: 54ff.) means those renegade figures (he has in mind the nouveaux philosophes) who, though once involved in a political sequence, now deny the necessity of rupture embodied in the political event, yet who incorporate (and often passively benefit from) certain of its novelties whilst producing new discourses to delegitimise faithful subjectivity.

  14. 14.

    Cf. Badiou (2009: 56): “the form of the faithful subject nonetheless remains the unconscious of the reactive subject.”

  15. 15.

    Cf. Badiou (2014: 125): “The violence that compels the individual to become a commodified body [un corps marchand] is not direct violence against the body, it is a violence done to the capacity of the body in the idea, to its capacity to be the bearer of something other than its own interests.” (I am grateful to Daria Saburova for help in translating this difficult sentence). For Badiou, “democracy” in neoliberal guise consists in the violent command to “live without Idea” (ibid.); the “bare power” [pouvoir nu] that secretly drives contemporary democracy “exerts considerable violence at the level of what one might call the frontier zone between bodies and ideas” (ibid.: 128).

  16. 16.

    Elsewhere one character is described as a “living Giacometti” (Naudé 2015: 16) with a “bone structure … angular, like something from a Futurist painting” (18). In yet another story, a dancer’s body is described as “[l]ike something from modernist photography – an Edward Weston study of the body as abstraction” (280).

  17. 17.

    “Reno” is the name ascribed to the protagonist by others.

  18. 18.

    This is a further example of the impersonal-personal dynamic: the mechanical impersonality of film is, in fact, a deeply racializing technology designed to codify whiteness as the social norm.

  19. 19.

    “It was the discord that had struck him so many years earlier … It had been the discord of the two, cracked limestone wall and gleaming motor parts” (Kushner 2013: 39). Jameson’s hypothesis is supported by Ram (2012).

Works Cited

  • Alliez, Éric, and Maurizio Lazzarato. 2016. Guerres et Capital. Paris: Éditions Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Perry. 1984. Modernity and Revolution. New Left Review I/144: 96–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arruzza, Cinzia. 2014. Remarks on Gender. Viewpoint Magazine. URL: https://www.viewpointmag.com/2014/09/02/remarks-on-gender/. Last Accessed 9/10/17.

  • Auerbach, Erich. 2003 [1946]. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Trans. Willard R. Trask. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiou, Alain. 1999 [1989]. Manifesto for Philosophy. Trans. Norman Madarasz. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001 [1993]. Ethics: An Essay on the Understanding of Evil. Trans. Peter Hallward. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003 [1997]. Saint Paul: the Foundation of Universalism. Trans. Ray Brassier. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005 [1998]. Metapolitics. Trans. Jason Barker. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007 [2005]. The Century. Trans. Alberto Toscano. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008a. The Communist Hypothesis. New Left Review 49: 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008b [2007]. The Meaning of Sarkozy. Trans. David Fernbach. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009 [2006]. Logics of Worlds. Trans. Alberto Toscano. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Images du temps présent: 2001–2004. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan, Gopal. 2009. Speculations on the Stationary State. New Left Review 59: 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, Jesse. 2013. Insurrection: An Interview with Rachel Kushner. Paris Review. URL: https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2013/04/03/insurrection-an-interview-with-rachel-kushner/. Last Accessed 12/10/17.

  • Basso, Luca. 2015. Marx and the Common: From Capital to the Late Writings. Leiden: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Benanav, Aaron, et al. 2015. An Identical Abject-Subject? Endnotes 4: 276–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, Luc, and Ève Chiapello. 2005 [1999]. The New Spirit of Capitalism. Trans. Gregory Elliott. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Wendy. 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Budgen, Sebastian. 2000. A New ‘Spirit of Capitalism’. New Left Review 1: 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, Rebecca. 2017. Fictitious Capital and the Re-emergence of Personal Forms of Domination. Continental Thought and Theory: A Journal of Intellectual Freedom 1 (4): 566–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 1989. Rethinking Working-Class History: Bengal 1890 to 1940. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chanson, Vincent, Alexis Cukier, and Frédéric Monferrand, eds. 2014. La Réification: Histoire et actualité d’un concept critique. Paris: La Dispute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dardot, Pierre et Christian Laval. 2013 [2009]. The New Way of the World: On Neoliberal Society. Trans. Gregory Elliott. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Mike. 2006. Planet of Slums. London: Verso.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, Jodi. 2016. Crowds and Party. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1983 [1972]. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. Robert Hurley, Mark Seem & Helen R. Lane. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denning, Michael. 2010. Wageless Life. New Left Review 66: 79–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, Terry. 2003. Sweet Violence: The Idea of the Tragic. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, Roberto. 2012. The Dispositif of the Person. Law, Culture and the Humanities 8 (1): 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finelli, Roberto. 1987. Astrazione e dialettica dal romanticismo al capitalismo (saggio su Marx). Rome: Bulzoni Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbach, Franck. 2016 [2009]. Sans objet. Capitalisme, subjectivité, aliénation. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, Joseph. 2017. Trump Seems to Support Bush’s AIDS Program for Now. The Atlantic. URL: https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2017/02/pepfar-global-gag-rule-trump/515961/. Last Accessed 8/10/2017.

  • Fraser, Nancy. 2013. Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, Hugo. 1956. Die Struktur der Modernen Lyrik. Hamburg: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1974. The Structure of Modern Poetry. Trans. Joachim Neugroschel. Evanston: Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, Christian P. 2017. The Impersonal Is Political: Adrienne Rich’s The Dream of a Common Language, Feminism, and the Art of Biopolitics. Cultural Critique 96: 178–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, Matthew, and Alexander Rocca. 2015. An Interview with Rachel Kushner. Contemporary Literature 56 (2): 192–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, Daniel. 2017. Radical Schiller and the Young Marx. In Aesthetic Marx, ed. Samir Gandesha and Johan Hartle. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, Michael. 2012. Individuum, Personifikation und unpersönliche Herrschaft in Marx’ Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. In Anonyme Herrschaft. Zur Struktur moderner Machtverhältnisse, ed. I. Elbe, S. Ellmers, and J. Eufinger. Münster: Verlag Westfälisches Dampfboot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Matthew. 2013. Lifeblood: Oil, Freedom, and the Forces of Capital. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, Fredric. 1991. Postmodernism; or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. A Singular Modernity: Essay on the Ontology of the Present. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Valences of the Dialectic. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Antinomies of the Realism-Modernism Debate. Modern Language Quarterly 73 (3): 475–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jelly-Schapiro, Eli. 2019. Literature, Theory, and the Temporalities of Neoliberalism. In Neoliberalism and Contemporary American Literature, ed. Liam Kennedy and Stephen Shapiro. Hanover: UPNE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kushner, Rachel. 2013. The Flamethrowers. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukács, Georg. 1971 [1968]. History and Class Consciousness. London: Merlin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl. 1973 [1857–8]. Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (Rough Draft). Trans. Martin Nicolaus. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1976 [1867]. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy: Volume One. Trans. Ben Fowkes. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClanahan, Annie J. 2017. Becoming Non-Economic: Human Capital Theory and Wendy Brown’s Undoing the Demos. Theory & Event 20 (2): 510–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monferrand, Frédéric. 2017. Le capital et son monde: contribution à une lecture ontologique du Capital. Revue Période. URL: http://revueperiode.net/le-capital-et-son-monde/. Last Accessed 9/10/2017.

  • Moore, Jason W. 2015. Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———., ed. 2016. Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Oakland: PM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naudé, S.J. 2015 [2011]. The Alphabet of Birds. Trans. S.J. Naudé. London: And Other Stories.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noys, Benjamin. 2010. The Persistence of the Negative: A Critique of Contemporary Continental Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Postone, Moishe. 1993. Time, Labor, and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx’s Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Powers, Nina, and Alberto Toscano. 2009. The Philosophy of Restoration: Alain Badiou and the Enemies of May. boundary 2 36 (1): 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, Harsha. 2012. Futurist Geographies: Uneven Modernities and the Struggle for Aesthetic Autonomy: Paris, Italy, Russia, 1909–1914. In The Oxford Handbook of Global Modernisms, ed. Mark Wollaeger and Matt Eatough. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, Jacques. 1999 [1995]. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Trans. Julie Rose. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sastry, Shaunak, and Mohan Jyoti Dutta. 2013. Global Health Interventions and the “Common Sense” of Neoliberalism: A Dialectical Analysis of PEPFAR. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 6 (1): 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, James. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serfati, Claude. 2017. Le militaire: Une histoire française. Paris: Éditions Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohn-Rethel, Alfred. 1978. Intellectual and Manual Labour: A Critique of Epistemology. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Toscano, Albert. 2007. ‘European Nihilism’ and Beyond: Commentary by Alberto Toscano. In The Century, ed. Alain Badiou. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. The Open Secret of Real Abstraction. Rethinking Marxism 20 (2): 273–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toscano, Alberto. 2010. The Politics of Abstraction: Communism and Philosophy. In The Idea of Communism, ed. Costas Douzinas and Slazoj Žižek. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Raymond. 1963 [1958]. Culture and Society: 1780–1950. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Ellen Meiksins. 1995. Democracy Against Capitalism: Renewing Historical Materialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Hartley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hartley, D. (2019). Keeping It Real: Literary Impersonality Under Neoliberalism. In: Deckard, S., Shapiro, S. (eds) World Literature, Neoliberalism, and the Culture of Discontent. New Comparisons in World Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05441-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics