Skip to main content

The Financial Stress Spillover: Evidence from Selected Asian Countries

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Theoretical and Applied Statistics (SIS 2015)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 274))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The objective of the study is to analyze financial stress spillover among selected Asian countries, namely, China, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Malaysia and India for the period from Jan 2001 to Dec 2009. The financial stress is measured by Financial Stress Index (FSI), a specially designed comprehensive measure of financial stress. The methodology of Yimlam 2012 is adopted for analyzing dynamics of variance decomposition among countries using FSI for the selected countries. The results of the study confirm that China and Pakistan are the largest transmitters of spillover towards other selected countries. Also the net spillover of China and Pakistan indicated to be positive whereas all other countries show up negative net spillovers. The economic and geographic linkages are suggested to be responsible for influencing magnitude of spillover among selected countries. Finally, the response of each country to shocks in other countries is found to be positive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abbas, Khan S., Shah, Z.A.: Volatility spillover among regional Asian stock markets. Emerg. Mark. Rev. 16, 66 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aggarwal, R., Kyaw, N.A.: Equity market integration in the NAFTA region: evidence from unit root and co-integration tests. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 14, 393–406 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Allen, D.E., Amram, R., McAleer, M.: Volatility spillovers from the Chinese Stock market to economic neighbours. Math. Comput. Simul. 94, 238–257 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2013.01.001

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Allen, D.E., McAleer, M., Powell, R.J., Singh, A.K.: Volatility spillovers from Australia’s major trading partners across the GFC. Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2016.10.007

  5. Aloui, R., Ben Aissa, M.S., Nguyen, D.K.: Global financial crisis, extreme interdependences, and contagion effects: the role of economic structure? J. Bank. Financ. 35, 130–141 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Antonakakis, N., Vergos, K.: Sovereign bond yield spillovers in the Euro zone during the financial and debt crisis. J. Int. Financ. Mark. Inst. Money 26, 258–272 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2013.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Apostolakis, G., Papadopoulos, A.P.: Financial stress spillovers in advanced economies. J. Int. Financ. Mark. Inst. Money 32, 128–149 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2014.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Apostolakis, G., Papadopoulos, A.P.: Financial stress spillovers across the banking, securities and foreign exchange markets. J. Financ. Stab. 19, 1–21 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2015.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Babecky, Jan, Havranek, Tomas, Mateju, Jakub, Rusnak, Marek, Smidkova, Katerina, Vasicek, Borek: Leading indicators of crisis incidence: evidence from developed countries. J. Int. Money Financ. 35(2013), 1–19 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Balakrishnan, R., Danninger, S., Tytell, I., Elekdag, S.A.: The transmission of financial stress from advanced to emerging economies (No. 09/133). Working Paper Series IMF (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Basu, R.: Financial contagion and investor learning: an empirical investigation. International Monetary Fund (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Beirne, J., Caporale, G.M., Schulze-Ghattas, M., Spagnolo, N.: Global and regional spillovers in emerging stock markets: a multivariate GARCH-in-mean analysis. Emerg. Mark. Rev. 11, 250–260 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Caramazza, F., Ricci, L.A., Salgado, R.: Trade and financial contagion in currency crises. IMF Working Paper WP/00/55, International Monetary Fund, Washington (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cardarelli, R., Elekdag, S., Lall, S.: Financial stress and economic contractions. J. Financ. Stab. 7, 78–97 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2010.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cardarelli, R., Elekdag, S., Lall, S.: Financial stress, downturns, and recoveries. (No. 09/100) IMF Working Paper (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chi, J., Li, K., Young, M.: Financial integration in East Asian equity markets. Pac. Econ. Rev. 11(4), 513–526 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chiang, S.M., Chen, H.F., Lin, C.T.: The spillover effects of the sub-prime mortgage crisis and optimum asset allocation in the BRICV stock markets. Glob. Financ. J. 24, 30–43 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Choudhry, T.: International transmission of stock returns and volatility: empirical comparison between friends and foes. Emerg. Mark. Financ. Trade 40(4), 33–52 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Chui, Hall, Taylor: Crisis spillovers in emerging market economies: interlinkages, vulnerabilities and investor behavior. Bank of England, Working Paper No. 212 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Claeys, P., Vasícek, B.: Measuring bilateral spillover and testing contagion on sovereign bond markets in Europe. J. Bank. Financ. (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin. Accessed 5 Nov 2014

  21. Diebold, F.X., Yilmaz, K.: Better to give than to receive: predictive directional measurement of volatility spillovers. Int. J. Forecast. 28, 57–66 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2011.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Eichengreen, B., Rose A.: Contagious currency crises: channels of conveyance. In: Ito, T., Krueger, A. (eds.) Changes in Exchange Rates in Rapidly Developing Economies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fernández, F., Puig, M., Rivero, S.: Volatility spillovers in EMU sovereign bond markets. Research Institute of Applied Economics. Working Paper 2015/10- 1/32 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Forbes, K.: Are trade linkages important determinants of country vulnerability to crises? In: Paper Prepared for the NBER Conference on Currency Crises Prevention, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, January 2001

    Google Scholar 

  25. Forbes, K.J., Rigobon, R.: No contagion, only interdependence: measuring stock market comovements. J. Financ. 57, 2223–2261 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gallo, G.M., Velucchi, M.: Market interdependence and financial volatility transmission in East Asia. Int. J. Financ. Econ. 14, 24–44 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gerard, B., Thanyalakpark, K., Batten, J.A.: Are the East Asian markets integrated? Evidence from the ICAPM. J. Econ. Bus. 55(5), 585–607 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Glick, R., Rose, A.K.: Contagion and trade: why are currency crises regional? J. Int. Money Financ. 18, 603–617 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Goetzmann, W., Ingersoll, J., Spiegel, M.I., Welch, I.: Sharpening sharpe ratios. National Bureau of Economic Research (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Greenwood, M., Nguyen, V., Rafferty, B.: Risk and return spillovers among the G10 currencies. J. Financ. Mark. (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2016.05.001

  31. Grobys, Klaus: Are volatility spillovers between currency and equity market driven by economic states? Evidence from the US economy. Econ. Lett. 127(2015), 72–75 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Heryan, T., Ziegelbauer, J.: Relations between yields of government bonds in GIPS countries during the sovereign debt crisis in The EMU. 13th International Scientific Conference “Economic Policy in the European Union Member Countries” September 2–4, 2015, Karolinka, CZECH REPUBLIC (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Janakiraman, S., Lamba, A.S.: An empirical examination of linkages between Pacific-basin stock markets. J. Int. Financ. Mark. Inst. Money 8, 155–173 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Khalid, A.M., Rajaguru, G.: Financial market linkages in South Asia: evidence using a multivariate GARCH model. Pak. Dev. Rev. 43(4), 585–603 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Khan, M.A., Sajid, M.Z.: Integration of financial markets in SAARC countries: evidence based on uncovered interest rate parity hypothesis. Kashmir Econ. Rev. 16(1), 1–16 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  36. King, M., Wadhwani, S.: Transmission of volatility between stock markets. Rev. Financ. Stud. 1(3), 5–33 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Laeven, L., Valencia, F.: Systemic banking crises: a new database. Working Paper, unpublished, International Monetary Fund, Washington (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lee, H., Liao, T., Huang, Y., Huang, T.: Dynamic spillovers between oil and stock markets: new approaches at spillover index. Int. J. Financ. Res. 6(2), 2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mukherji, Ronit: Stock market efficiency in developing economies. J. Appl. Econ. Res. 9(4), 402–429 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mukulu, Sandra, Hettihewa, Samanthala, Wright, Christopher S.: Financial contagion: an empirical investigation of the relationship between financial-stress indexes of Australia and the US. J. Appl. Bus. Econ. 16(3), 2014 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Neaime, S.: Volatilities in emerging MENA stock markets. Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev. 48(4), 455–484 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Neaime, S.: The global financial crisis, financial linkages and correlations in returns and volatilities in emerging MENA stock markets. Emerg. Mark. Rev. 13(3), 268–288 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Qayyum, A., Kemal, A.R.: Volatility spillover between the stock market and the foreign exchange market in Pakistan. MPRA paper 1715. University Library of Munich, Germany (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Riman1, H.B., Offiong, A.I., Egbe, I.E.: Effect of volatility transmission on domestic stock returns: evidence from nigeria. J. Int. Bus. Econ. 2, 189–219 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Singh, P., Kumar, B., Pandey, A.: Price and volatility spillovers across North American, European, and Asian stock markets. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 19, 55–64 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang, Z., Yang, J., Bessler, D.A.: Financial crisis and African stock market integration. Appl. Econ. Lett. 10, 527–533 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yilmaz, K.: Return and volatility spillovers among the East Asian equity markets. J. Asian Econ. 21, 304–313 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2009.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biagio Simonetti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix A: VAR Analysis

 

China

India

Malaysia

Pakistan

Sri Lanka

CHINA(−1)

0.302823

0.052225

0.121179

0.102787

0.00603

 

−0.13367

−0.12939

−0.13788

−0.11002

−0.1188

 

[ 2.26550]

[ 0.40363]

[ 0.87890]

[ 0.93422]

[ 0.05076]

India(−1)

0.036415

0.227214

−0.150422

−0.049573

0.191282

 

−0.14968

−0.14489

−0.1544

−0.12321

−0.13304

 

[ 0.24328]

[ 1.56818]

[−0.97427]

[−0.40236]

[1.43780]

Malaysia(−1)

0.042012

0.149417

0.486591

0.032349

−0.028551

 

−0.10854

−0.10507

−0.11196

−0.08934

−0.09647

 

[ 0.38705]

[ 1.42208]

[ 4.34605]

[ 0.36206]

[−0.29595]

Pakistan(−1)

0.290666

0.375003

0.250893

0.779128

0.011282

 

−0.0985

−0.09535

−0.1016

−0.08108

−0.08755

 

[2.95081]

[3.93291]

[2.46930]

[ 9.60934]

[ 0.12886]

Sri Lanka(−1)

0.007378

0.030333

0.086871

0.001282

0.456337

 

−0.10428

−0.10094

−0.10756

−0.08583

−0.09268

 

[ 0.07075]

[0.30051]

[0.80765]

[ 0.01494]

[4.92372]

C

0.024338

0.033375

−0.03342

−0.00558

−0.031657

 

−0.21202

−0.20523

−0.21869

−0.17452

−0.18844

 

[ 0.11479]

[0.16262]

[−0.15282]

[−0.03197]

[−0.16799]

R-squared

0.392873

0.520204

0.441596

0.671718

0.363847

Adj. R-squared

0.362817

0.496451

0.413953

0.655467

0.332355

Sum sq. resids

485.4769

454.8872

516.5255

328.9219

383.5076

S.E. equation

2.192419

2.122224

2.261441

1.80462

1.948616

F-statistic

13.07147

21.9012

15.97456

41.33251

11.55339

Log likelihood

−232.7346

−229.2527

−236.0513

−211.9065

−220.1208

Mean dependent

0.013182

0.018067

−0.031475

−0.02356

−0.026511

S.D. dependent

2.746576

2.990684

2.954057

3.074469

2.384808

Appendix B: VAR Lag Order Selection Criteria

Lag

LogL

LR

FPE

AIC

SC

HQ

0

−1096.44

NA

1648.249

21.59685

21.72553

21.64896

1

−1003.83

174.3199*

438.1272*

20.27121*

21.04327*

20.58384*

2

−986.398

31.10711

509.9942

20.41957

21.835

20.99273

3

−971.511

25.10486

627.3644

20.61785

22.67666

21.45153

4

−954.259

27.40018

742.6635

20.76978

23.47195

21.86398

5

−933.901

30.33715

836.2091

20.8608

24.20635

22.21553

6

−913.877

27.87567

961.145

20.95838

24.94731

22.57363

* Indicates lag order selected by the criterion

  

Appendix C: Stability Test: AR Roots of Characteristic Polynomial

Root

Modulus

 

0.828249

0.828249

0.515858

0.515858

0.301387 − 0.092044i

0.315129

0.301387 + 0.092044i

0.315129

0.305214

0.305214

No root lies outside the unit circle. VAR satisfies the stability condition

Appendix D: Generalized Impulse Response Analysis

Appendix E

Construction of Index

The Financial Stress Index (FSI) comprises five variables, which are aggregated into an overall index to capture credit conditions in three financial market segments (banking, securities markets, and exchange markets). These five components all help associate the degree of financial stress with large swings in asset prices, abrupt changes regarding uncertainty and the appetite for risk, (international) liquidity conditions, credit availability and/or financial intermediation. The five components of the FSI are presented in table below:

The choice of sub-indices was limited by data considerations and a preference for parsimony.

To obtain the aggregate Financial Stress Index for each country the five components are standardized and summed up:

FSI = β + Stock market returns + Stock market volatility + Sovereign debt spreads + EMPI

 

Category

Variable

Measurement

1

Banking sector

Banking beta

CAPM: banking sector equity index

2

Security market

Stock return

 

Stock volatility

GARCH (1, 1)

Sovereign debt spread

Bond Yield – 10y US T-Yield. Using JP Morgan EMBI Global Spread. o/w 5 year Credit Default Swap Spread

3

Exchange markets

Exchange market pressure (EMPI)

[%age change Exchange Rate] – [%age Change of Total Reserve-Gold]

Further details on the definition of the five components (before standardization) and the aggregation method are given below:

  1. 1.

    Banking Sector:

The Banking-sector beta is the standard capital asset pricing model (CAPM) beta, and is defined as follows:

$$ \beta_{i,t} = \frac{{COV\left( {r_{i,t}^{M} ,r_{i,t}^{M} } \right)}}{{\sigma_{i,M}^{2} }}, $$

where:

rM::

The market returns

rB::

The banking returns

The beta greater than one shows that banking stocks move more than proportionately with the overall stock market—suggests that the banking sector is relatively risky, and would be associated with a higher likelihood of a banking crisis.

  1. 2.

    Stock Market

Stock Market Returns are the percentage change in the stock index. A decrease in equity prices corresponds to increased securities-market-related stress.

Stock market volatility is a time-varying measure of market volatility obtained from a GARCH(1, 1) specification, using month-over-month real returns and modeled as an autoregressive process with 12 lags.

Sovereign debt spreads is defined as the bond yield minus the 10-year United States Treasury yield using JPMorgan EMBI Global spreads. When EMBI data were not available, five-year credit default swap spreads were used.

  1. 3.

    Foreign Exchange Market

The EMPI captures exchange rate depreciations and declines in international reserves, and is defined for country i in month t as:

$$ EMPI_{i,t} = \frac{{\left( {\Delta e_{i,t} - \mu_{i,\Delta e} } \right)}}{{\sigma_{i,\Delta e} }} - \frac{{\left( {\Delta RES_{i,t} - \mu_{i,\Delta RES} } \right)}}{{\sigma_{i,\Delta RES} }}, $$

where:

Δe::

percentage change in exchange rate

ΔRES::

percentage change in total reserves minus gold

μ::

the mean

σ::

the standard deviation

All variables are in monthly or daily frequency. The index is constructed by taking the average of the components after adjusting for the sample mean and standardizing by the sample standard deviation. Then it is converted into quarterly frequency by taking the average of the monthly data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shah, Z.A., Majeed, M.E., Simonetti, B., Crocetta, C. (2019). The Financial Stress Spillover: Evidence from Selected Asian Countries. In: Crocetta, C. (eds) Theoretical and Applied Statistics. SIS 2015. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 274. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05420-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics