Abstract
The objective of the study is to analyze financial stress spillover among selected Asian countries, namely, China, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Malaysia and India for the period from Jan 2001 to Dec 2009. The financial stress is measured by Financial Stress Index (FSI), a specially designed comprehensive measure of financial stress. The methodology of Yimlam 2012 is adopted for analyzing dynamics of variance decomposition among countries using FSI for the selected countries. The results of the study confirm that China and Pakistan are the largest transmitters of spillover towards other selected countries. Also the net spillover of China and Pakistan indicated to be positive whereas all other countries show up negative net spillovers. The economic and geographic linkages are suggested to be responsible for influencing magnitude of spillover among selected countries. Finally, the response of each country to shocks in other countries is found to be positive.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbas, Khan S., Shah, Z.A.: Volatility spillover among regional Asian stock markets. Emerg. Mark. Rev. 16, 66 (2013)
Aggarwal, R., Kyaw, N.A.: Equity market integration in the NAFTA region: evidence from unit root and co-integration tests. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 14, 393–406 (2005)
Allen, D.E., Amram, R., McAleer, M.: Volatility spillovers from the Chinese Stock market to economic neighbours. Math. Comput. Simul. 94, 238–257 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2013.01.001
Allen, D.E., McAleer, M., Powell, R.J., Singh, A.K.: Volatility spillovers from Australia’s major trading partners across the GFC. Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2016.10.007
Aloui, R., Ben Aissa, M.S., Nguyen, D.K.: Global financial crisis, extreme interdependences, and contagion effects: the role of economic structure? J. Bank. Financ. 35, 130–141 (2011)
Antonakakis, N., Vergos, K.: Sovereign bond yield spillovers in the Euro zone during the financial and debt crisis. J. Int. Financ. Mark. Inst. Money 26, 258–272 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2013.06.004
Apostolakis, G., Papadopoulos, A.P.: Financial stress spillovers in advanced economies. J. Int. Financ. Mark. Inst. Money 32, 128–149 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2014.06.001
Apostolakis, G., Papadopoulos, A.P.: Financial stress spillovers across the banking, securities and foreign exchange markets. J. Financ. Stab. 19, 1–21 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2015.05.003
Babecky, Jan, Havranek, Tomas, Mateju, Jakub, Rusnak, Marek, Smidkova, Katerina, Vasicek, Borek: Leading indicators of crisis incidence: evidence from developed countries. J. Int. Money Financ. 35(2013), 1–19 (2013)
Balakrishnan, R., Danninger, S., Tytell, I., Elekdag, S.A.: The transmission of financial stress from advanced to emerging economies (No. 09/133). Working Paper Series IMF (2009)
Basu, R.: Financial contagion and investor learning: an empirical investigation. International Monetary Fund (2002)
Beirne, J., Caporale, G.M., Schulze-Ghattas, M., Spagnolo, N.: Global and regional spillovers in emerging stock markets: a multivariate GARCH-in-mean analysis. Emerg. Mark. Rev. 11, 250–260 (2010)
Caramazza, F., Ricci, L.A., Salgado, R.: Trade and financial contagion in currency crises. IMF Working Paper WP/00/55, International Monetary Fund, Washington (2000)
Cardarelli, R., Elekdag, S., Lall, S.: Financial stress and economic contractions. J. Financ. Stab. 7, 78–97 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2010.01.005
Cardarelli, R., Elekdag, S., Lall, S.: Financial stress, downturns, and recoveries. (No. 09/100) IMF Working Paper (2009)
Chi, J., Li, K., Young, M.: Financial integration in East Asian equity markets. Pac. Econ. Rev. 11(4), 513–526 (2006)
Chiang, S.M., Chen, H.F., Lin, C.T.: The spillover effects of the sub-prime mortgage crisis and optimum asset allocation in the BRICV stock markets. Glob. Financ. J. 24, 30–43 (2013)
Choudhry, T.: International transmission of stock returns and volatility: empirical comparison between friends and foes. Emerg. Mark. Financ. Trade 40(4), 33–52 (2004)
Chui, Hall, Taylor: Crisis spillovers in emerging market economies: interlinkages, vulnerabilities and investor behavior. Bank of England, Working Paper No. 212 (2004)
Claeys, P., Vasícek, B.: Measuring bilateral spillover and testing contagion on sovereign bond markets in Europe. J. Bank. Financ. (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin. Accessed 5 Nov 2014
Diebold, F.X., Yilmaz, K.: Better to give than to receive: predictive directional measurement of volatility spillovers. Int. J. Forecast. 28, 57–66 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2011.02.006
Eichengreen, B., Rose A.: Contagious currency crises: channels of conveyance. In: Ito, T., Krueger, A. (eds.) Changes in Exchange Rates in Rapidly Developing Economies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1999)
Fernández, F., Puig, M., Rivero, S.: Volatility spillovers in EMU sovereign bond markets. Research Institute of Applied Economics. Working Paper 2015/10- 1/32 (2015)
Forbes, K.: Are trade linkages important determinants of country vulnerability to crises? In: Paper Prepared for the NBER Conference on Currency Crises Prevention, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, January 2001
Forbes, K.J., Rigobon, R.: No contagion, only interdependence: measuring stock market comovements. J. Financ. 57, 2223–2261 (2002)
Gallo, G.M., Velucchi, M.: Market interdependence and financial volatility transmission in East Asia. Int. J. Financ. Econ. 14, 24–44 (2009)
Gerard, B., Thanyalakpark, K., Batten, J.A.: Are the East Asian markets integrated? Evidence from the ICAPM. J. Econ. Bus. 55(5), 585–607 (2003)
Glick, R., Rose, A.K.: Contagion and trade: why are currency crises regional? J. Int. Money Financ. 18, 603–617 (1999)
Goetzmann, W., Ingersoll, J., Spiegel, M.I., Welch, I.: Sharpening sharpe ratios. National Bureau of Economic Research (2002)
Greenwood, M., Nguyen, V., Rafferty, B.: Risk and return spillovers among the G10 currencies. J. Financ. Mark. (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2016.05.001
Grobys, Klaus: Are volatility spillovers between currency and equity market driven by economic states? Evidence from the US economy. Econ. Lett. 127(2015), 72–75 (2015)
Heryan, T., Ziegelbauer, J.: Relations between yields of government bonds in GIPS countries during the sovereign debt crisis in The EMU. 13th International Scientific Conference “Economic Policy in the European Union Member Countries” September 2–4, 2015, Karolinka, CZECH REPUBLIC (2015)
Janakiraman, S., Lamba, A.S.: An empirical examination of linkages between Pacific-basin stock markets. J. Int. Financ. Mark. Inst. Money 8, 155–173 (1998)
Khalid, A.M., Rajaguru, G.: Financial market linkages in South Asia: evidence using a multivariate GARCH model. Pak. Dev. Rev. 43(4), 585–603 (2004)
Khan, M.A., Sajid, M.Z.: Integration of financial markets in SAARC countries: evidence based on uncovered interest rate parity hypothesis. Kashmir Econ. Rev. 16(1), 1–16 (2007)
King, M., Wadhwani, S.: Transmission of volatility between stock markets. Rev. Financ. Stud. 1(3), 5–33 (1990)
Laeven, L., Valencia, F.: Systemic banking crises: a new database. Working Paper, unpublished, International Monetary Fund, Washington (2008)
Lee, H., Liao, T., Huang, Y., Huang, T.: Dynamic spillovers between oil and stock markets: new approaches at spillover index. Int. J. Financ. Res. 6(2), 2015 (2015)
Mukherji, Ronit: Stock market efficiency in developing economies. J. Appl. Econ. Res. 9(4), 402–429 (2015)
Mukulu, Sandra, Hettihewa, Samanthala, Wright, Christopher S.: Financial contagion: an empirical investigation of the relationship between financial-stress indexes of Australia and the US. J. Appl. Bus. Econ. 16(3), 2014 (2014)
Neaime, S.: Volatilities in emerging MENA stock markets. Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev. 48(4), 455–484 (2006)
Neaime, S.: The global financial crisis, financial linkages and correlations in returns and volatilities in emerging MENA stock markets. Emerg. Mark. Rev. 13(3), 268–288 (2012)
Qayyum, A., Kemal, A.R.: Volatility spillover between the stock market and the foreign exchange market in Pakistan. MPRA paper 1715. University Library of Munich, Germany (2006)
Riman1, H.B., Offiong, A.I., Egbe, I.E.: Effect of volatility transmission on domestic stock returns: evidence from nigeria. J. Int. Bus. Econ. 2, 189–219 (2014)
Singh, P., Kumar, B., Pandey, A.: Price and volatility spillovers across North American, European, and Asian stock markets. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 19, 55–64 (2010)
Wang, Z., Yang, J., Bessler, D.A.: Financial crisis and African stock market integration. Appl. Econ. Lett. 10, 527–533 (2003)
Yilmaz, K.: Return and volatility spillovers among the East Asian equity markets. J. Asian Econ. 21, 304–313 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2009.09.001
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix A: VAR Analysis
China | India | Malaysia | Pakistan | Sri Lanka | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHINA(−1) | 0.302823 | 0.052225 | 0.121179 | 0.102787 | 0.00603 |
−0.13367 | −0.12939 | −0.13788 | −0.11002 | −0.1188 | |
[ 2.26550] | [ 0.40363] | [ 0.87890] | [ 0.93422] | [ 0.05076] | |
India(−1) | 0.036415 | 0.227214 | −0.150422 | −0.049573 | 0.191282 |
−0.14968 | −0.14489 | −0.1544 | −0.12321 | −0.13304 | |
[ 0.24328] | [ 1.56818] | [−0.97427] | [−0.40236] | [1.43780] | |
Malaysia(−1) | 0.042012 | 0.149417 | 0.486591 | 0.032349 | −0.028551 |
−0.10854 | −0.10507 | −0.11196 | −0.08934 | −0.09647 | |
[ 0.38705] | [ 1.42208] | [ 4.34605] | [ 0.36206] | [−0.29595] | |
Pakistan(−1) | 0.290666 | 0.375003 | 0.250893 | 0.779128 | 0.011282 |
−0.0985 | −0.09535 | −0.1016 | −0.08108 | −0.08755 | |
[2.95081] | [3.93291] | [2.46930] | [ 9.60934] | [ 0.12886] | |
Sri Lanka(−1) | 0.007378 | 0.030333 | 0.086871 | 0.001282 | 0.456337 |
−0.10428 | −0.10094 | −0.10756 | −0.08583 | −0.09268 | |
[ 0.07075] | [0.30051] | [0.80765] | [ 0.01494] | [4.92372] | |
C | 0.024338 | 0.033375 | −0.03342 | −0.00558 | −0.031657 |
−0.21202 | −0.20523 | −0.21869 | −0.17452 | −0.18844 | |
[ 0.11479] | [0.16262] | [−0.15282] | [−0.03197] | [−0.16799] | |
R-squared | 0.392873 | 0.520204 | 0.441596 | 0.671718 | 0.363847 |
Adj. R-squared | 0.362817 | 0.496451 | 0.413953 | 0.655467 | 0.332355 |
Sum sq. resids | 485.4769 | 454.8872 | 516.5255 | 328.9219 | 383.5076 |
S.E. equation | 2.192419 | 2.122224 | 2.261441 | 1.80462 | 1.948616 |
F-statistic | 13.07147 | 21.9012 | 15.97456 | 41.33251 | 11.55339 |
Log likelihood | −232.7346 | −229.2527 | −236.0513 | −211.9065 | −220.1208 |
Mean dependent | 0.013182 | 0.018067 | −0.031475 | −0.02356 | −0.026511 |
S.D. dependent | 2.746576 | 2.990684 | 2.954057 | 3.074469 | 2.384808 |
Appendix B: VAR Lag Order Selection Criteria
Lag | LogL | LR | FPE | AIC | SC | HQ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | −1096.44 | NA | 1648.249 | 21.59685 | 21.72553 | 21.64896 |
1 | −1003.83 | 174.3199* | 438.1272* | 20.27121* | 21.04327* | 20.58384* |
2 | −986.398 | 31.10711 | 509.9942 | 20.41957 | 21.835 | 20.99273 |
3 | −971.511 | 25.10486 | 627.3644 | 20.61785 | 22.67666 | 21.45153 |
4 | −954.259 | 27.40018 | 742.6635 | 20.76978 | 23.47195 | 21.86398 |
5 | −933.901 | 30.33715 | 836.2091 | 20.8608 | 24.20635 | 22.21553 |
6 | −913.877 | 27.87567 | 961.145 | 20.95838 | 24.94731 | 22.57363 |
* Indicates lag order selected by the criterion |
Appendix C: Stability Test: AR Roots of Characteristic Polynomial
Root | Modulus | |
---|---|---|
0.828249 | 0.828249 |
|
0.515858 | 0.515858 | |
0.301387 − 0.092044i | 0.315129 | |
0.301387 + 0.092044i | 0.315129 | |
0.305214 | 0.305214 | |
No root lies outside the unit circle. VAR satisfies the stability condition |
Appendix D: Generalized Impulse Response Analysis
Appendix E
Construction of Index
The Financial Stress Index (FSI) comprises five variables, which are aggregated into an overall index to capture credit conditions in three financial market segments (banking, securities markets, and exchange markets). These five components all help associate the degree of financial stress with large swings in asset prices, abrupt changes regarding uncertainty and the appetite for risk, (international) liquidity conditions, credit availability and/or financial intermediation. The five components of the FSI are presented in table below:
The choice of sub-indices was limited by data considerations and a preference for parsimony.
To obtain the aggregate Financial Stress Index for each country the five components are standardized and summed up:
FSI = β + Stock market returns + Stock market volatility + Sovereign debt spreads + EMPI
Category | Variable | Measurement | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Banking sector | Banking beta | CAPM: banking sector equity index |
2 | Security market | Stock return | |
Stock volatility | GARCH (1, 1) | ||
Sovereign debt spread | Bond Yield – 10y US T-Yield. Using JP Morgan EMBI Global Spread. o/w 5 year Credit Default Swap Spread | ||
3 | Exchange markets | Exchange market pressure (EMPI) | [%age change Exchange Rate] – [%age Change of Total Reserve-Gold] |
Further details on the definition of the five components (before standardization) and the aggregation method are given below:
-
1.
Banking Sector:
The Banking-sector beta is the standard capital asset pricing model (CAPM) beta, and is defined as follows:
where:
- rM::
-
The market returns
- rB::
-
The banking returns
The beta greater than one shows that banking stocks move more than proportionately with the overall stock market—suggests that the banking sector is relatively risky, and would be associated with a higher likelihood of a banking crisis.
-
2.
Stock Market
Stock Market Returns are the percentage change in the stock index. A decrease in equity prices corresponds to increased securities-market-related stress.
Stock market volatility is a time-varying measure of market volatility obtained from a GARCH(1, 1) specification, using month-over-month real returns and modeled as an autoregressive process with 12 lags.
Sovereign debt spreads is defined as the bond yield minus the 10-year United States Treasury yield using JPMorgan EMBI Global spreads. When EMBI data were not available, five-year credit default swap spreads were used.
-
3.
Foreign Exchange Market
The EMPI captures exchange rate depreciations and declines in international reserves, and is defined for country i in month t as:
where:
- Δe::
-
percentage change in exchange rate
- ΔRES::
-
percentage change in total reserves minus gold
- μ::
-
the mean
- σ::
-
the standard deviation
All variables are in monthly or daily frequency. The index is constructed by taking the average of the components after adjusting for the sample mean and standardizing by the sample standard deviation. Then it is converted into quarterly frequency by taking the average of the monthly data.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Shah, Z.A., Majeed, M.E., Simonetti, B., Crocetta, C. (2019). The Financial Stress Spillover: Evidence from Selected Asian Countries. In: Crocetta, C. (eds) Theoretical and Applied Statistics. SIS 2015. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 274. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05420-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05420-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05419-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05420-5
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)