Skip to main content

Security in Outer Space: Rising Stakes for Europe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Yearbook on Space Policy 2017

Part of the book series: Yearbook on Space Policy ((YEARSPACE))

  • 652 Accesses

Abstract

The ecosystem of the space sector has shifted drastically over the past decades with new technical concepts and business endeavours building on a changing institutional and economic environment. Now a pillar of the modern economy and society, the global space infrastructure enables key services across vital sectors and directly supports public actions to address economic, societal, environmental and security issues at a national and global level. This ever-growing use of space-based data and services by a variety of public and private actors/users has created a virtually invisible dependence on space technologies, which closely relates to Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). As the use of space applications becomes more pervasive, brings more benefits and becomes part of the business-as-usual routine, dependence on space infrastructure intensifies, which creates new vulnerabilities for the economy and society at large.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    PwC (2017). Dependence of the European Economy on Space Infrastructures. Brussels: EU Publications. Retrieved from: http://www.copernicus.eu/sites/default/files/library/Copernicus_SocioEconomic_Impact_October_2016.pdf

  2. 2.

    PwC (2016). Study to examine the socioeconomic impact of Copernicus in the EU. Report on The socio-economic impact of the Copernicus programme. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from European Commission: http://www.copernicus.eu/sites/default/files/library/Copernicus_SocioEconomic_Impact_October_2016.pdf

  3. 3.

    https://www.numerama.com/politique/386721-galileo-le-gps-europeen-compte-200-millions-dutilisateurs-dans-le-monde.html

  4. 4.

    PwC (2016). Study to examine the socioeconomic impact of Copernicus in the EU. Report on The socio-economic impact of the Copernicus programme. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from European Commission: http://www.copernicus.eu/sites/default/files/library/Copernicus_SocioEconomic_Impact_October_2016.pdf

  5. 5.

    European Commission. (2015). The European Agenda on Security. Brussels. Retrieved from European Commission: https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/e-library/documents/basic-documents/docs/eu_agenda_on_security_en.pdf

  6. 6.

    European Commission (2016). Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic And Social Committee And The Committee Of The Regions Space Strategy For Europe. COM (2016) 705 final. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2016/EN/COM-2016-705-F1-EN-MAIN.PDF

  7. 7.

    Mutschler, M. M. (2010). Keeping Space Safe. Towards A Long-Term Strategy to Arms Control in Space. Frankfurt: Peace Research Institute Frankfurt.

  8. 8.

    Sitruk, A., & Plattard, S. (2017). The Governance of Galileo. Vienna: European Space Policy Institute. Retrieved from ESPI: https://www.espi.or.at/images/Rep62_online_170203_1142.pdf

  9. 9.

    European Commission (2016). Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic And Social Committee And The Committee Of The Regions Space Strategy For Europe. COM (2016) 705 final. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2016/EN/COM-2016-705-F1-EN-MAIN.PDF

  10. 10.

    Ibid.

  11. 11.

    Specifically, DoD resistance to open SSA data sets, algorithms, and processes to external review and scrutiny, results in the uncertainty of the data and in possible false positive rates. See: https://www.ida.org/idamedia/Corporate/Files/Publications/STPIPubs/2016/P-8038.ashx

  12. 12.

    Froeliger, J. L. (2017). Greater Industry Cooperation Needed to Avoid Space Collisions. INTELSAT http://www.intelsat.com/news/blog/greater-industry-cooperation-needed-to-avoid-space-collisions/

  13. 13.

    Space-Track. User agreement. Retrieved from https://www.space-track.org/documentation#/user_agree

  14. 14.

    ESA. (2012). ESA deploys first orbital debris test radar in Spain. Retrieved from http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Operations/Space_Situational_Awareness/ESA_deploys_first_orbital_debris_test_radar_in_Spain

  15. 15.

    ESA. Space Situational Awareness. https://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Operations/Space_Situational_Awareness

  16. 16.

    Suzuki, K. Space Security: Is Europe a Credible Diplomatic Actor? Hokkaido University/Princeton University. Retrieved from https://swfound.org/media/91262/suzuki_kazuto.pdf

  17. 17.

    ESA. (2018) Earth’s first mission to a binary asteroid for planetary defence. Retrieved from: https://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Engineering_Technology/Hera/Earth_s_first_mission_to_a_binary_asteroid_for_planetary_defence

  18. 18.

    Jeff Foust. (2018) ESA plans second attempt at planetary defense mission. Retrieved from: https://spacenews.com/esa-plans-second-attempt-at-planetary-defense-mission/

  19. 19.

    The 2009 FP7 work programme of 2009 included a list of external events including “space debris, hostile laser or Anti SATellite systems (ASAT), jamming, viruses, natural or man-made electro-magnetic disturbances”. The work programme of 2010 supported 15 R&D projects. While the 2011 work programme included NEOs, space debris and weather were respectively covered in 2013. Horizon 2020 included a section on ‘Protection of European assets in and from space’ (H2020-PROTEC) in the 2014–2015 work programme, and a section called ‘Secure and safe space environment’ in the work programme 2018–2020. Within FP7, additional financial contributions were allocated to the PEOPLE Programme distributing grants for training and career development, under which the SpaceDebEMC (Space Debris Evolution, Collision risk and Mitigation), and the STARDUST (the Asteroid and Space Debris Network), benefited.

  20. 20.

    Official Journal of the European Union (2014). Decision No 541/2014/Eu Of The European Parliament And Of The Council. Retrieved from EUR-Lex: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2014/541(1)/oj

  21. 21.

    European Commission (2014). Decision No 541/2014/Eu Of The European Parliament And Of The Council. Retrieved form EUR-Lex: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:fbafc703-4eb8-11e8-be1d-01aa75ed71a1.0021.02/DOC_1&format=PDF

  22. 22.

    Ibid.

  23. 23.

    Ibid.

  24. 24.

    Ibid.

  25. 25.

    Note: Representatives of China, France, Russia, the UK and the USA as permanent members of the UN Security Council and representatives of Brazil, Chile, Italy, Kazakhstan, Nigeria, Romania, South Africa, South Korea, Sri Lanka and Ukraine.

  26. 26.

    Ministère de la Défense. (2013). Defence And National Security. French White Paper. Retrieved from https://www.defense.gouv.fr/content/download/215253/2394121/White%20paper%20on%20defense%20%202013.pdf

  27. 27.

    https://www.surrey.ac.uk/surrey-space-centre/missions/removedebris

  28. 28.

    The IET. (2017). https://eandt.theiet.org/content/articles/2017/07/satellites-to-be-fitted-with-sails-to-take-them-out-of-orbit-and-prevent-space-junk/

  29. 29.

    http://www.deorbitaldevices.com/

  30. 30.

    Jessica. (2017) The clean space blog. Retrieved from ESA: http://blogs.esa.int/cleanspace/2017/02/03/cleansat-an-exciting-opportunity-for-the-european-space-industry/

  31. 31.

    ESA. Clean Space: Cleansat. Retrieved from ESA: http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Engineering_Technology/Clean_Space/CleanSat

  32. 32.

    Code of conduct Working Document 21 (2014). Draft International Code of Conduct For Outer Space Activities. Retrieved from https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/space_code_conduct_draft_vers_31-march-2014_en.pdf

  33. 33.

    EEAS (2017). Conference on Disarmament – Working Group on the “Way Ahead” – EU Statement on the Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space. Retrieved from European Union-External Action: https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage/28329/conference-disarmament-working-group-way-ahead-eu-statement-prevention-arms-race-outer-space_en

  34. 34.

    EEAS (2016). Conference on Disarmament – Working Group of the “Way Ahead”. Geneva. Retrieved from European Union External Action: https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage/28329/conference-disarmament-working-group-way-ahead-eu-statement-prevention-arms-race-outer-space_en

  35. 35.

    Retrieved from CNES (2018): https://syracuse4.cnes.fr/fr/syracuse-4

  36. 36.

    Retrieved from CNES: https://robusta.cnes.fr/fr/ROBUSTA/Fr/index.htm

  37. 37.

    Leonardo. (2017) Press release: http://www.leonardocompany.com/en/-/esa-galileo-cyber

  38. 38.

    European GNSS Agency (2016). Security Accreditation. Retrieved from European GNSS Agency: https://www.gsa.europa.eu/security/accreditation

  39. 39.

    European Commission. (2018). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the space policy programme of the European Union, relating to the European Union Agency for Space and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1285/2013, No 377/2014 and No 912/2010 and Decision 541/2014/EU. Brussels.

  40. 40.

    Note: at the time of this report publication, the draft regulation is still under negotiation with member states.

  41. 41.

    As a way to foster increased international cooperation, establishing standards of responsible behaviour across the full range of space activity, strengthening commitments to non-interference in the peaceful exploration and use of outer space, facilitating equitable access to outer space and increasing transparency of outer space activities.

  42. 42.

    Weeden, B. (2017). Space Situational Awareness Fact Sheet. Retrieved form Space World Foundation: https://swfound.org/media/205874/swf_ssa_fact_sheet.pdf

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Burger, E., Bordacchini, G. (2019). Security in Outer Space: Rising Stakes for Europe. In: Yearbook on Space Policy 2017. Yearbook on Space Policy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05417-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05417-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05416-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05417-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics