Abstract
Industrial relations theory suffers from an economistic and Eurocentric bias, focusing on trade unions and the workplace. A new theory of strikes has to take a broader view and include other places of mobilisation and other forms of organisation. Apart from the classical lines of the analysis of trade unions, there is an alternative line of strike analysis focused on mass strikes and social movement unionism. Both lines of strike research come with important insights and can be combined with labour geography in order to provide the basis for a non-Eurocentric and non-economistic theory of strikes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In 1975, workers in non-core countries formed 50 per cent of the global industrial workforce, and the percentage went up steeply since then; see Smith 2016, 103. There are different estimations on union density on a global level. The International Centre for Trade Union Rights assumes that 13 per cent of the global workforce is unionised (2005). A more recent study of the International Trade Union Confederation (2014) claims 200 million unionised workers out of a workforce of 2.9 billion which would amount to a global union density of 7 per cent (see also van der Linden 2015, 17ff). This number does (obviously) not include the 230 million members of the ACFTU in the People’s Republic of China.
- 2.
Although Meiksins Wood distinguishes her position from the one of Louis Althusser, claiming that he denies agency to the working class (1982, 65), their positions converge on the key issues that concern us here: “it is therefore the class struggle, which constitutes the division into classes. (…) You must therefore begin with the class struggle if you want to understand class division (…)” (Althusser 1973, 82). Althusser distinguishes between class struggle as the motor of history (class constitution) and the fact that it is the masses who make history (class formation), while subordinating class formation to the more fundamental process of class constitution (ibid.): “That means that the revolutionary power of the masses comes precisely from the class struggle” (ibid.). While it is the masses that act, their power is based on the specific dynamics of social change in capitalism. Thus, while there is a motor of history, the anti-teleological notion here is that the outcome of this history is open and not pre-determined, and it is in this vein that Althusser claims that history is a “process without a Subject or Goal(s)” (1973, 139).
- 3.
Ross and Hartman included in the study Germany, France, Great Britain, the USA, Canada, Australia, the Netherlands, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Italy, South Africa, India and Japan.
- 4.
“The rights acquired in strongly organised workplaces (…) have normally been won autonomously, rarely with the involvement of the outside union” (1975, 159), but “it would be wrong to treat this in isolation from the formal trade unions structure” (161).
- 5.
See also in a similar vein: “More fundamentally, the idea that there is a clear distinction between organised and unorganised conflict is questionable” (Edwards 1979a, 96); “Ignorance of the importance of informal groups in industry led participants to concentrate on such false question as whether the strikes were spontaneous or planned” (1979b, 202).
- 6.
This differs from the definition given by John Kelly who claims that Luxemburg would qualify a strike wave only as a mass strike if it occurs “during periods of revolutionary struggle” (1988, 36). While such a definition cannot be found in Luxemburg’s work—contrary to the claim of Kelly—it also contradicts with Kelly’s own qualification that “mass strikes did not invariably pass over into political strikes, but only in ‘revolutionary situations’” (ibid., 37). Luxemburg clearly identifies the strikes in Rostov (Russia) in 1902 and in Belgium in the 1890s as mass strikes, and these strikes did not occur in a revolutionary situation. She also unmistakingly underlines, against Kautsky’s insinuations, that the mass strike has no immediate connection with a revolutionary overthrow: “Hat denn irgend jemand an eine plötzliche Einführung des Sozialismus durch den Massenstreik gedacht?” (Luxemburg 1909/10a, 360). Luxemburg characterises this immediate link between mass strike and revolution as the ‘anarchist spectre’ of the mass strike (ibid.); see also Nettl (1966, 152), Weick (1971, 145, 147), Hoffmann (1971, 239) and Haro (2008, 112) for a similar interpretation of Luxemburg’s theory of the mass strike.
- 7.
See the similar idea of Lenin, formulated in 1899: “Every strike brings thoughts of socialism very forcibly to the worker’s mind. (…) A strike teaches workers to understand what the strength of the employers and what the strength of the workers consists in. (…) Every strike reminds the workers that their position is not hopeless, that they are not alone.” But he also underlines the necessity for a broader political struggle: “Strikes are one of the ways in which the working class struggles for its emancipation, but they are not the only way; and if workers do not turn their attention to other means of conducting the struggle, they will slow down the growth and the successes of the working class. (…) From individual strikes the workers can and must go over (…) to a struggle of the entire working class for the emancipation of all who labour” (1899, 310ff). E.T. Hiller is like Luxemburg focusing on the mobilising and educating aspect of mass strikes: “Mass strikes invite retreat into the incalculable – the surge and emotion of a sympathetic group” (1928, 20); “The strike, though it bring no material gain, is felt to be a triumph if it brings this sense of importance. (…) Success gets its value from the struggle, and victory is always glorious, even if it is not profitable” (22).
- 8.
Walter Schluep underlines that revolutionary mass strikes would not be covered by labour law: “An industrial conflict aimed at destroying the whole economic system – in the form of permanent confrontation for example – is absolutely unjustifiable because it disrupts the very economic system from which it derives its legitimation. It cannot possibly be justified on the ground that a change in the economic order would inevitably affect (…) conditions in employment” (1974, 73).
- 9.
See also Brecher (1997, 287): “Before the widespread development of industry and employees, there could be no mass strikes.”
- 10.
Michael Hughes (2009, 119) claims that the 1905 strike of Ruhr miners in solidarity with the Russian Revolution drew many workers into the movement, leading to a rise of trade union membership. On the other hand, the collapse of the 1912 miners’ strike in Germany led to a decline of union membership.
- 11.
“It is thus an entirely mechanical, undialectical conception that strong organisations always have to precede the struggle” (own translation), in the German original: “Es ist eben eine ganz mechanische, undialektische Auffassung, dass starke Organisationen dem Kampfe immer vorausgehen müssen” (Luxemburg 1905b, 603).
- 12.
Lenin underlines in a letter written in November 1905 the significance of the workers’ councils (soviets) that emerged from the strikes. These councils united deputies of the strike committees that had been founded in workplaces. In his view, these organs should complement the political work of the party: “It seems to me that to lead the political struggle, both the Soviet (reorganised in a sense to be discussed forthwith) and the Party are, to an equal degree, absolutely necessary” (Lenin 1905, 21, emphasis in the original).
- 13.
Nildo Viana (2010) underlines that real wages in Russia decreased in 1903 and 1904 between 20 and 25 per cent which provided one of the underlying causes of the revolution in 1905; see also Floyd (1969). The mass strikes in Russia in 1905 were successful in establishing much shorter working days, but much of the initial gains, that is, on shorter working hours, were reversed in 1906 when the revolution ebbed away. Nevertheless, Lenin shows in a review in 1912 that the wage hikes achieved in 1905 were not rolled back, and the level of real wages remained significantly higher after 1905: “The year 1905 improved the worker’s living standard to a degree that normally is attained during several decades” (1912, 258f). He also demonstrates in other publications that workers in big factories dominated the strike movements between 1895 and 1912, with the workers in the metal industry and the regions of Poland and St. Petersburg taking a leading role (Lenin 1910, 1913, 534ff).
- 14.
A total of 50,000 strikers were subsequently conscripted into the army. Some authors claim that they were partly responsible for the mutinies in late 1918 that led to the revolution (Bailey 1980, 167). The metal workers who were at the forefront of the January 1918 strike had plans for an armed uprising in January 1919, and then contributed to the revolution that broke out two months earlier (Luban 2008, 25). In the aftermath of the revolution, a two-week-long general strike occurred in March 1919, during which far more than 1000 people were killed, primarily by state security forces (Lange 2012).
- 15.
Colin Barker, writing from a Marxist perspective, claims that he finds this concept-set useful, because of its allegedly “non-reductionist” (2011, 4) character, but criticises a “theory-practice disconnection” (6)—the theory is not interesting for activists—and a “structuralist objectivism” (ibid.) in how the concepts are used. I would rather claim that the concepts themselves limit the understanding of social movements.
References
Ackers, P. (2002). Reframing Employment Relations: The Case for Neo-pluralism. Industrial Relations Journal, 33(1), 2–19.
Adler, G., & Webster, E. (1995). Challenging Transition Theory: The Labour Movement, Radical Reform, and Transition to Democracy in South Africa. Politics and Society, 23(1), 75–106.
Adler, G., Maller, J., & Webster, E. (1992). Unions, Direct Action and Transition in South Africa. In N. Etherington (Ed.), Peace, Politics and Violence in the New South Africa (pp. 306–343). London: Hans Zell Publishers.
Althusser, L. (1969). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes Towards an Investigation). In L. Althusser (Ed.), Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays (pp. 127–188). London: New Left Books.
Althusser, L. (1973/2008). Reply to John Lewis. In L. Althusser (Ed.), On Ideology (pp. 61–139). London: Verso.
Alvarez, S. E., & Escobar, A. (1992). Conclusion: Theoretical and Political Horizons of Change in Latin American Social Movements. In A. Escobar & S. E. Alvarez (Eds.), The Making of Social Movements in Latin America (pp. 317–329). Boulder: Westview.
Antunes, R. (1988). A Rebeldia do Trabalho. São Paulo/Campinas: Ensaio/Unicamp.
Atleson, J. B. (1973). Work Group Behaviour and Wildcat Strikes: The Causes and Functions of Industrial Civil Disobedience. Ohio State Law Journal, 34(4), 751–814.
Bailey, S. (1980). The Berlin Strike of January 1918. Central European History, 13(2), 158–174.
Barker, C. (2011). Subjects in Movement: What Can Research on Trade Unionism Learn from Research on Social Movements? https://www.rosalux.de/fileadmin/rls_uploads/pdfs/Veranstaltungen/2011/Barker_Subjects_in_movement.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2018.
Baskin, J. (1991). Striking Back: A History of COSATU. Johannesburg: Ravan Press.
Bonilla, Y. (2010). Guadeloupe Is Ours. The Prefigurative Politics of the Mass Strike in the French Antilles. Interventions, 12(1), 125–137.
Brecher, J. (1997). Strike ! Revised and updated edition, Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
Breman, J., & van der Linden, M. (2014). Informalizing the Economy: The Return of the Social Question at a Global Level. Development and Change, 45(5), 920–940.
Brookes, M. (2015). How Context-Appropriate Strategies Help Transnational Labour Alliances Succeed. In A. Bieler, R. Erne, D. Golden, I. Helle, K. Kjeldstadli, T. Matos, & S. Stan (Eds.), Labour and Transnational Action in Times of Crisis (pp. 15–28). London: Rowman and Littlefield.
Burawoy, M. (1979). Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process Under Monopoly Capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Burawoy, M. (1985). The Politics of Production. London/New York: Verso.
Castells, M. (1977). The Urban Question. A Marxist Approach. London: Edward Arnold.
Castree, N. (2007). Labour Geography: A Work in Progress. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(4), 853–862.
Chandra, U. (2017). Marxism, Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Universalism. Critical Sociology, 43(4/5), 599–610.
Cho, S.-K. (2009). South Korea. Toward a Collective Public Sociology of Labor. Work and Occupations, 36(2), 162–176.
Clark, G. L. (1988). A Question of Integrity: The National Labor Relations Board, Collective Bargaining and the Relocation of Work. Political Geography Quarterly, 7(3), 209–227.
Cliff, T. (1985). Patterns of Mass Strike. International Socialism, 2(29), 3–61.
Coe, N. M., & Jordhus-Lier, D. C. (2011). Constrained Agency? Re-Evaluating the Geographies of Labour. Progress in Human Geography, 35(2), 211–233.
Cronin, J. E. (1979). Industrial Conflict in Modern Britain. London: Croom Helm.
Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
de Almeida, M. H. T. (1978). Desarrollo Capitalista y Acción Sindical. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 40(2), 467–492.
Della Porta, D. (2017). Political Economy and Social Movement Studies: The Class Basis of Anti-Austerity Protests. Anthropological Theory, 17(4), 453–473.
Dobson, C. R. (1980). Masters and Journeymen: A Prehistory of Industrial Relations, 1717–1800. London: Croom Helm.
Dribbusch, H., & Vandaele, K. (2007). Comprehending Divergence in Strike Activity. Employers’ Offensives, Government Interventions and Union Responses. In S. van der Velden, H. Dribbusch, D. Lyddon, & K. Vandaele (Eds.), Strikes Around the World: 15 Case Studies (pp. 366–381). Amsterdam: Aksant.
Dunn, B. (2007). Problems of Social Movement Unionism. In A. Gamble, S. Ludlam, A. Taylor, & S. Wood (Eds.), Labour, the State, Social Movements and the Challenge of Neoliberal Globalisation (pp. 131–146). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Edwards, P. K. (1979a). Strikes and Unorganised Conflict: Some Further Considerations. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 7(1), 95–98.
Edwards, P. K. (1979b). The ‘Social’ Determination of Strike Activity: An Explication and Critique. Journal of Industrial Relations, 21(2), 198–216.
Edwards, P. K. (1986). Conflict at Work. A Materialist Analysis of Workplace Relations. Oxford: Basil-Blackwell.
Edwards, P. K. (1990). Understanding Conflict in the Labour Process: The Logic and Autonomy of Struggle. In D. Knights & H. Willmott (Eds.), Labour Process Theory (pp. 125–152). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Eldridge, J. E. T., & Cameron, G. C. (1968). Unofficial Strikes: Some Objections Considered. In J. E. T. Eldridge (Ed.), Industrial Disputes. Essays in the Sociology of Industrial Relations (pp. 68–90). London: Routledge.
Ellem, B., & Shields, J. (1999). Rethinking ‘Regional Industrial Relations’: Space, Place and the Social Relations of Work. The Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(4), 536–560.
Engeman, C. (2015). Social Movement Unionism in Practice: Organizational Dimensions of Union Mobilization in the Los Angeles Immigrant Rights Marches. Work, Employment and Society, 29(3), 444–461.
Esser, J. (1982). Gewerkschaften in der Krise. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
Fantasia, R. (1983). The Wildcat Strike and Industrial Relations. Industrial Relations Journal, 14, 74–86.
Fantasia, R. (1988). Cultures of Solidarity. Berkeley: The University of California Press.
Floyd, D. (1969). Russia in Revolt: 1905: The First Crack in Tzarist Power. London: Macdonald & Co.
Friedman, S. (1987). Building Tomorrow Today: African Workers in Trade Unions, 1970–1985. Johannesburg: Ravan Press.
Fröbel, F., Heinrichs, J., & Kreye, O. (1980). The New International Division of Labour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fulcher, J. (1973). Class Conflict in Sweden. Sociology, 7(1), 49–70.
Fuller, C. (2015, January 5). The Mass Strike in the First World War. International Socialism, 145. http://isj.org.uk/the-mass-strike-in-the-first-world-war/. Accessed 16 May 2018.
Gallas, A. (2018). Class Power and Union Capacities: A Research Note on the Power Resources Approach. Global Labour Journal, 9(3), 348–352.
Geras, N. (1976). The Legacy of Rosa Luxemburg. London: New Left Books.
Griffiths, M. J., & Johnston, R. J. (1991). What’s in a Place? An Approach to the Concept of Place, as Illustrated by the British National Union of Mineworkers’ Strike, 1984–85. Antipode, 23(2), 185–213.
Haro, L. (2008). Destroying the Threat of Luxemburgism in the SPD and the KPD: Rosa Luxemburg and the Theory of Mass Strike. Critique, 36(1), 107–120.
Harris, N. (1986). The End of the Third World. Newly Industrializing Countries and the Decline of an Ideology. New York: Penguin.
Harvey, D. (1982). The Limits to Capital. Oxford: Blackwell.
Harvey, D. (2016). The ‘New’ Imperialism. Accumulation by Dispossession. In D. Harvey (Ed.), The Ways of the World (pp. 245–271). London: Profile Books.
Hebdon, R., & Noh, S. C. (2013). A Theory of Workplace Conflict Development: From Grievances to Strikes. In G. Gall (Ed.), New Forms and Expressions of Conflict at Work (pp. 26–47). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Herod, A. (1997). From a Geography of Labor to a Labor Geography: Labor’s Spatial Fix and the Geography of Capitalism. Antipode, 29(1), 1–31.
Herod, A. (1998). The Spatiality of Labor Unionism: A Review Essay. In A. Herod (Ed.), Organizing the Landscape (pp. 1–36). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Hiller, E. T. (1928). The Strike. A Study in Collective Action. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hirsch, J. (1976). Bemerkungen zum theoretischen Ansatz einer Analyse des bürgerlichen Staates. In Gesellschaft – Beiträge zur Marxschen Theorie 8/9 (pp. 99–149). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Hobsbawm, E. (1964). Labouring Men: Studies in the History of Labour. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Hoffmann, R. (1971). Streik als gesellschaftsverändernde Praxis. In D. Schneider (Ed.), Zur Theorie und Praxis des Streiks (pp. 210–246). Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
Holgate, J. (2015). Community Organising in the UK: A ‘New’ Approach for Trade Unions? Economic and Industrial Democracy, 36(3), 431–455.
Hughes, M. L. (2009). ‘The Knife in the Hands of the Children’? Debating the Political Mass Strike and Political Citizenship in Imperial Germany. Labour History, 50(2), 113–138.
Humphrey, J. (1982). Capitalist Control and Workers’ Struggle in the Brazilian Auto Industry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hutchison, J. (1992). Women in the Philippines’ Garment Export Industry. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 22(4), 471–489.
Hyman, R. (1972/1989). Strikes. 4th edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hyman, R. (1975). Industrial Relations. A Marxist Introduction. London/Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Hyman, R. (1978). Occupational Structure, Collective Organisation and Industrial Militancy. In C. Crouch & A. Pizzorno (Eds.), The Resurgence of Class Conflict in Western Europe since 1968 (Vol. 2, pp. 31–70). London/Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Hyman, R. (1989). The Political Economy of Industrial Relations. Theory and Practice in a Cold Climate. Houndmills et al.: Macmillan.
Hyman, R. (2001). Understanding European Trade Unionism: Between Market, Class and Society. London: Sage.
Hyman, R. (2004). Is Industrial Relations Theory Always Ethnocentric? In B. E. Kaufman (Ed.), Theoretical Perspectives on Work and the Employment Relationship (pp. 265–292). Madison: Cornell University Press.
Hyman, R. (2012). Will the Real Richard Hyman Please Stand Up? Capital and Class, 36(1), 154–164.
ILO. (2015). World Employment and Social Outlook – Trends in 2015. Geneva: ILO.
Ingham, G. (1974). Strikes and Industrial Conflict. Britain and Scandinavia. London/Basingstoke: Macmillan.
International Centre for Trade Union Rights. (2005). Trade Unions of the World. London: John Harper.
International Trade Union Confederation. (2014). Building Workers’ Power. Congress Statement. Berlin: International Trade Union Confederation.
Irving, T. (2017). History and the Working Class Now: The Collective Impulse, Tumult and Democracy. Journal of Working-Class Studies, 2(1), 105–115.
James, A., & Vira, B. (2012). Labour Geographies of India’s New Service Economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(4), 841–875.
Jefferys, J. B. (1946). The Story of the Engineers, 1800–1945. London: EP Publishing.
Johnston, K. (1986). Judicial Adjudication and the Spatial Structure of Production: Two Decisions by the National Labor Relations Board. Environment and Planning A, 18, 27–39.
Jonas, A. E. G. (1996). Local Labour Control Regimes: Uneven Development and the Social Regulation of Production. Regional Studies, 30(4), 323–338.
Jones, A. (2008). The Rise of Global Work. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33(1), 12–26.
Jordhus-Lier, D. (2013). The Geographies of Community-Oriented Unionism: Scales, Targets, Sites and Domains of Union Renewal in South Africa and Beyond. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38, 36–49.
Kautsky, K. (1909/10–1972). Eine neue Strategie. In A. Grunenberg (Ed.), Die Massenstreikdebatte (pp. 153–190). Frankfurt/Main: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.
Kelly, J. (1988). Trade Unions and Socialist Politics. London: Verso.
Kelly, P. F. (2013). Production Networks, Place and Development: Thinking Through Global Production Networks in Cavite, Philippines. Geoforum, 44, 82–92.
Kerr, C., Dunlop, J., Harbison, F., & Myers, C. A. (1973). Industrialism and Industrial Man: The Problems of Labour and Management in Economic Growth. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Köhler, H. D., & Calleja Jimenez, J. P. (2015). “They Don’t Represent Us!” Opportunities for a Social Movement Unionism Strategy in Spain. Relations Industrielles, 70(2), 240–261.
Kornhauser, A., Dubin, R., & Ross, A. M. (1954). Industrial Conflict. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Korpi, W. (1974). Conflict, Power and Relative Deprivation. The American Political Science Review, 68(4), 1569–1578.
Korpi, W. (1983). The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Korpi, W. (1985). Power Resource Approach vs. Action and Conflict: On Causal and Intentional Explanations in the Study of Power. Sociological Theory, 3(2), 31–45.
Korpi, W., & Shalev, M. (1979). Strikes, Industrial Relations and Class Conflict in Capitalist Society. British Journal of Sociology, 30(2), 164–187.
Kraak, G. (1993). Breaking the Chains: Labour in South Africa in the 1970s and 1980s. London/Boulder: Zed Press.
Kuhn, J. W. (1961). Bargaining in Grievance Settlement. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lambert, R. (1989). Social Movement Unionism: The Urgent Task of Definition. Comments of Peter Waterman’s Brief Note on Social Movement Unionism. Department of Social Anthropology, University of Western Australia.
Lambert, R., & Webster, E. (1988). The Re-Emergence of Political Unionism in Contemporary South Africa? In W. Cobbett & R. Cohen (Eds.), Popular Struggles in South Africa (pp. 20–41). London: James Currey.
Lange, D. (2012). Massenstreik und Schiessbefehl. Generalstreik und Märzkämpfe in Berlin 1919. Münster: Edition Assemblage.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lenin, V. I. (1899). On Strikes. In Collected Works (Vol. 4, pp. 310–319). Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Lenin, V. I. (1905). Our Tasks and the Soviet of Workers’ Deputies. In Collected Works (Vol. 10, pp. 17–28). Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Lenin, V. I. (1906). Lessons of the Moscow Uprising. In Collected Works (Vol. 11, pp. 171–178). Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Lenin, V. I. (1910). Strike Statistics in Russia. In Collected Works (Vol. 16, pp. 393–422). Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Lenin, V. I. (1912). The Strike Movement and Wages. In Collected Works (Vol. 18, pp. 258–259). Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Lenin, V. I. (1913). Strikes in Russia. In Collected Works (Vol. 19, pp. 534–538). Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Lipset, S. (1960). Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. New York: Anchor Books.
Loureiro, I. M. (1997). Democracia e socialismo em Rosa Luxemburgo. Critica Marxista, 4, 45–57.
Luban, O. (2008). Die Massenstreiks für Frieden und Demokratie im Ersten Weltkrieg. In C. Boebel & L. Wentzel (Eds.), Streiken gegen den Krieg (pp. 11–26). Hamburg: VSA.
Lukács, G. (2000). History and Class Consciousness. Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Luxemburg, R. (1902a). Der dritte Akt. In Gesammelte Werke (Vol. 1.2, pp. 195–203). Berlin: Dietz.
Luxemburg, R. (1902b). Das belgische Experiment. In Gesammelte Werke (Vol. 1.2, pp. 212–219). Berlin: Dietz.
Luxemburg, R. (1902c). Und zum dritten Male das belgische Experiment. In Gesammelte Werke (Vol. 1.2, pp. 229–248). Berlin: Dietz.
Luxemburg, R. (1903/4). Geknickte Hoffnungen. In Gesammelte Werke (Vol. 1.2, pp. 394–402). Berlin: Dietz.
Luxemburg, R. (1904/5). Die Revolution in Russland. In Gesammelte Werke (Vol. 1.2, pp. 477–484). Berlin: Dietz.
Luxemburg, R. (1905a). Die Revolution in Russland. In Gesammelte Werke (Vol. 1.2, pp. 509–518). Berlin: Dietz.
Luxemburg, R. (1905b). Parteitag der Sozialdemokratischen Partei Deutschlands vom 17. bis 23. September 1905 in Jena. In Gesammelte Werke (Vol. 1.2, pp. 595–604). Berlin: Dietz.
Luxemburg, R. (1906). The Mass Strike, The Political Party, and the Trade Unions. In H. Scott (Ed.), The Essential Rosa Luxemburg (Vol. 2008, pp. 111–181). Chicago: Haymarket.
Luxemburg, R. (1909/10a). Ermattung oder Kampf? In Gesammelte Werke (Vol. 2, pp. 344–377). Berlin: Dietz.
Luxemburg, R. (1909/10b). Die Theorie und die Praxis. In Gesammelte Werke (Vol. 2, pp. 378–420). Berlin: Dietz.
Luxemburg, R. (1910). Der politische Massenstreik und die Gewerkschaften. Rede am 1. Oktober 1910 in Hagen in der ausserordentlichen Mitgliederversammlung des Deutschen Metallarbeiter-Verbandes. In Gesammelte Werke (Vol. 2, pp. 463–483). Berlin: Dietz.
Luxemburg, R. (1913). Das belgische Experiment. In Gesammelte Werke (Vol. 3, pp. 195–207). Berlin: Dietz.
Lyddon, D. (1994). Industrial Relations Theory and Labor History. International Labor and Working-Class History, 46, 122–141.
Lyddon, D. (2015, April 12). Bureaucratic Mass Strikes: A Response to Mark O’Brien. International Socialism, 146. http://isj.org.uk/bureaucratic-mass-strikes-a-response-to-mark-obrien/. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
Maree, J. (Ed.). (1987). The Independent Trade Unions, 1974–1984: Ten Years of the South African Labour Bulletin. Johannesburg: Ravan Press.
Marx, K. (1867a). Capital, Volume 1. Harmondsworth: Penguin. (1976 edition).
Marx, K. (1867b). Instructions for the Delegates of the Provisional General Council. The Different Questions. In Collected Works (Vol. 20, pp. 185–194). Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Marx, A. W. (1992). Lessons of Struggle: South African Internal Opposition, 1960–1990. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Massey, D. (1984). Spatial Divisions of Labour. Social Structures and the Geography of Production. Houndmills: Macmillan.
McMichael, P. (1990). Incorporating Comparison Within a World-Historical Perspective: An Alternative Comparative Method. American Sociological Review, 55(3), 385–397.
McNally, D. (2013). ‘Unity of the Diverse’: Working Class Formations and Popular Uprisings from Cochabamba to Cairo. In C. Barker, L. Cox, J. Krinsky, & A. G. Nilsen (Eds.), Marxism and Social Movements (pp. 401–423). Leiden: Brill.
Meiksins Wood, E. (1982). The Politics of Theory and the Concept of Class: E.P. Thompson and His Critics. Studies in Political Economy, 9(1), 45–75.
Melucci, A. (1980). The New Social Movements: A Theoretical Approach. Social Science Information, 19(2), 199–226.
Mosoetsa, S., Stillerman, J., & Tilly, C. (2016). Precarious Labor: South and North: An Introduction. International Labor and Working-Class History, 89, 5–19.
Müller-Jentsch, W. (1985). Trade Unions as Intermediary Organizations. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 6, 3–33.
Munck, R. (1988). The New International Labour Studies: An Introduction. London: Zed Books.
Negri, A. (1988). Crisis of the Planner-State: Communism and Revolutionary Organisation. In A. Negri (Ed.), Revolution Retrieved: Selected Writings on Marx, Keynes, Capitalist Crisis and New Social Subjects (pp. 91–148). London: Red Notes.
Negt, O. (1974). Rosa Luxemburg. Zur materialistischen Dialektik von Spontaneität und Organisation. In C. Pozzoli (Ed.), Rosa Luxemburg oder Die Bestimmung des Sozialismus (pp. 152–198). Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
Neilson, D. (2017). In-Itself for-Itself: Towards Second-Generation Neo-Marxist Class Theory. Capital & Class. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816817723299.
Ness, I. (2016). Southern Insurgency. The Coming of the Global Working Class. London: Pluto Press.
Nettl, J. P. (1966). Rosa Luxemburg. Oxford: Oxford Paperbacks.
Nowak, J. (2016). The Spatial Patterns of Mass Strikes: A Labour Geography Approach. Geoforum, 75, 270–273.
Nowak, J. (2017). Crossing Over: Mass Strikes in India and Brazil as the Terrain of a New Social Movement Unionism? Development and Change, 48(5), 965–986.
Nowak, J. (2018). The Spectre of Social Democracy. A Symptomatic Reading of the Power Resources Approach. Global Labour Journal, 9(3), 353–360.
Nowak, J., & Gallas, A. (2014). Mass Strikes Against Austerity in Western Europe. A Strategic Assessment. Global Labour Journal, 5(3), 306–321.
O’Brien, M. (2014, April 2). The Problem of the One-Day Strike: A Reply to Sean Vernell. International Socialism, 142. http://isj.org.uk/the-problem-of-the-one-day-strike-a-response-to-sean-vernell/. Accessed 18 May 2018.
Omvedt, G. (1993). Reinventing Revolution: New Social Movements and the Socialist Tradition in India. New York: East Gate.
P., Neethi. (2016). Globalization Lived Locally. A Labour Geography Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Park, M. (2007). South Korean Trade Unionism at the Crossroads: A Critique of ‘Social-Movement’ Unionism. Critical Sociology, 33, 311–344.
Peck, J. (1996). Work-Place: The Social Regulation of Labor Markets. London: The Guilford Press.
Pozzoli, C. (1974). Rosa Luxemburg als Marxist. Einleitende Thesen. In C. Pozzoli (Ed.), Rosa Luxemburg oder Die Bestimmung des Sozialismus (pp. 9–20). Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
Price, R. (1989). ‘What’s in a Name?’ Workplace History and ‘Rank and Filism’. International Review of Social History, XXXIV, 62–77.
Quinlan, M. (2017). The Origins of Worker Mobilisation. Australia 1788–1850. London: Routledge.
Rainnie, A., McGrath-Champ, S., & Herod, A. (2010). Making Space for Geography in Labour Process Theory. In P. Thompson & C. Smith (Eds.), Working Life. Renewing Labour Process Analysis (pp. 297–315). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Rees, G. (1985). Regional Restructuring, Class Change, and Political Action: Preliminary Comments on the 1984–1985 Miners’ Strike in South Wales. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 3, 389–406.
Ross, A. M. (1954). The Natural History of the Strike. In A. Kornhauser, R. Dubin, & A. M. Ross (Eds.), Industrial Conflict (pp. 23–36). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ross, A. M. (1966). Introduction. In A. Ross (Ed.), Industrial Relations and Economic Development (pp. xi–xxxv). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ross, A. M., & Hartman, P. T. (1960). Changing Patterns of Industrial Conflict. New York: Wiley.
Rule, J. (1981). The Experience of Labour in Eighteenth-Century England. London: Croom Helm.
Schluep, W. R. (1974). The Risks of Uncontrollable Industrial Conflicts. In R. H. Preston & J. Keiser (Eds.), Industrial Conflicts and Their Place in Modern Society (pp. 64–82). London: SCM Press.
Schmalz, S., Ludwig, C., & Webster, E. (2018). The Power Resources Approach: Developments and Challenges. Global Labour Journal, 9(2), 113–134.
Scipes, K. (1992). Social Movement Unionism and the Kilusang Mayo Uno. Kasarinlan, 7(2/3), 121–162.
Scipes, K. (2001). Social Movement Unionism: Can We Apply the Theoretical Conceptualization to the New Unions in South Africa – and beyond? http://labournet.de/discussion/gewerkschaft/smuandsa.html. Accessed 15 May 2018.
Scott, J. F., & Homans, G. C. (1947). Reflections on the Wildcat Strikes. American Sociological Review, 12(3), 278–287.
Seidman, G. W. (1994). Manufacturing Militance. Workers’ Movements in Brazil and South Africa, 1970–1985. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Serdar, A. (2015). Reconsidering Social Movement Unionism in Postcrisis Argentina. Latin American Perspectives, 42(2), 74–89.
Shorter, E., & Tilly, C. (1974). Strikes in France 1830–1968. London: Cambridge University Press.
Silver, B. (2003). Forces of Labour. Workers’ Movements and Globalization since 1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Silver, B. (2014). Theorising the Working Class in Twenty-First-Century Global Capitalism. In M. Atzeni (Ed.), Workers and Labour in a Globalised Capitalism (pp. 46–69). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Smith, N. (1984). Uneven Development. Nature, Capital and the Production of Space. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Smith, J. (2016). Imperialism in the Twenty-First Century. Globalization, Super-Exploitation and Capitalism’s Final Crisis. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Southall, H. (1988). Towards a Geography of Unionization: The Spatial Organisation and Distribution of Early British Trade Unions. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 13, 466–483.
Sunley, P. (1986). Regional Restructuring, Class Change, and Political Action: A Comment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 4, 465–468.
Swider, S. (2015). Building China. Informal Work and the New Precariat. New York: Cornell University Press.
Tarrow, S. (1998/2011). Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Revised Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, E. P. (1963). The Making of the English Working Class. London: Penguin. (Penguin Classics edition 2013).
Tilly, C. (1978). From Mobilization to Revolution. New York: Random House.
Touraine, A. (1985). An Introduction to the Study of Social Movements. Social Research, 52(4), 749–787.
Trott, B. (2017). Operaismo and the Wicked Problem of Organisation. Journal of Labor and Society, 20(3), 307–324.
Van der Linden, M. (2008). Workers of the World. Essays Toward a Global Labor History. Leiden: Brill.
Van der Linden, M. (2015). The Crisis of the World’s Old Labour Movements. In A. Bieler, R. Erne, D. Golden, I. Helle, K. Kjeldstadli, T. Matos, & S. Stan (Eds.), Labour and Transnational Action in Times of Crisis (pp. 15–28). London: Rowman and Littlefield.
Van der Linden, M., & Thorpe, W. (1990). Aufstieg und Niedergang des revolutionären Syndikalismus. 1999, 3, 9–38.
Vernell, S. (2013, October 18). The Working Class, Trade Unions and the Left: The Contours of Resistance. International Socialism, 140. http://isj.org.uk/the-working-class-trade-unions-and-the-left-the-contours-of-resistance/. Accessed 28 May 2018.
Viana, N. (2010). A Revolução Russa de 1905 e os Conselhos Operários. Em Debate, 4, 42–58.
Von Holdt, K. (2002). Social Movement Unionism: The Case of South Africa. Work, Employment and Society, 16(2), 283–304.
Warde, A. (1988). Industrial Restructuring, Local Politics and the Reproduction of Labour Power: Some Theoretical Considerations. Environment and Planning D, 6, 75–95.
Waterman, P. (1991). Social-Movement Unionism: A New Model for a New World, Working Paper Series No. 110. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5130391_Social-movement_unionism_a_new_model_for_a_new_world. Accessed 26 Feb 2016.
Webster, E. (1981). ‘Stay-Aways’ and the Black Working Class: Evaluating a Strategy. Labour Capital and Society, 14(1), 10–38.
Webster, E. (1987). The Rise of Social-Movement Unionism: The Two Faces of the Black Trade Union Movement in South Africa. In P. Frankel, N. Pines, & M. Swilling (Eds.), State, Resistance and Change in South Africa (pp. 174–196). London: Croom Helm.
Webster, E. (2008). Recasting Labour Studies in the Twenty-First Century. Labor Studies Journal, 33(3), 249–254.
Weekes, B. C. M. (1970). The Amalgamated Society of Engineers, 1880–1914: A Story of Trade Union Government, Politics and Industrial Policy. PhD, University of Warwick.
Weick, E. (1971). Theorien des Streiks. In D. Schneider (Ed.), Zur Theorie und Praxis des Streiks (pp. 97–154). Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
Wills, J. (1996). Geographies of Trade Unionism: Translating Traditions Across Space and Time. Antipode, 28(4), 352–378.
Wills, J. (1998). Space, Place and Tradition in Working-Class Organization. In A. Herod (Ed.), Organizing the Landscape (pp. 129–158). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Woodward, J. (1954). The Dockworker: An Analysis of Conditions of Employment in the Port of Manchester. Liverpool: University Press of Liverpool.
Wright, S. (2002). Storming Heaven: Class Composition and Struggle in Italian Autonomist Marxism. London: Pluto Press.
Zeitlin, J. (1989a). ‘Rank and Filism’ in British Labour History: A Critique. International Review of Social History, XXXIV, 42–61.
Zeitlin, J. (1989b). ‘Rank and Filism’ and Labour History: A Rejoinder to Price and Cronin. International Review of Social History, XXXIV, 89–102.
Zemni, S., de Smet, B., & Bogaert, K. (2012). Luxemburg on Tahrir Square: Reading the Arab Revolutions with Rosa Luxemburg’s The Mass Strike. Antipode, 45(4), 888–907.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nowak, J. (2019). A New Theory of Strikes: Moving Beyond Eurocentrism. In: Mass Strikes and Social Movements in Brazil and India. Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05375-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05375-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05374-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05375-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)