Skip to main content

An Exploration of the Effects of Managerial Intervention on Engineering Design Team Performance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design Computing and Cognition '18 (DCC 2018)

Abstract

Engineering is often done in teams, but teams are not always efficient and maximally proficient. This work explores whether a portion of the resources used for solving a problem could instead be used to manage and control the design process of the remainder of a team. Consequently, this research begins to investigate whether a manager can improve the collective performance of engineering design teams.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Laughlin PR (2011) Group problem solving. Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hoffman LR (1966) Group problem solving. In: Advances in experimental social psychology, pp 99–132

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Littlepage G, Robison W, Reddington K (1997) Effects of task experience and group experience on group performance, member ability, and recognition of expertise. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 69(2):133–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim MS (2007) Analysis of team interaction and team creativity of student design teams based on personal creativity modes. In: Proceeding of ASME 2007 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ven A, Van De, Delbeco AL (2017) Nominal versus interacting group processes for committee decision-making effectiveness 14(2):203–212

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tesluk PE, Quigley NR, Tekleab AG (2009) A longitudinal study of team conflict, conflict management, cohesion, and team effectivenss. Gr Organ Manage 34(2):170–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Turkalj Z, Fosic I, Dujak D (2008) Conflict management in organization. Interdiscip Manag (917340826)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Isaksen SG (2013) Facilitating creative problem-solving groups [Online]. Available: http://www.cpsb.com/research/articles/creative-problem-solving/Facilitating-CPS-Groups.html

  9. Treffinger DJ, Isaksen SG (2009) Creative problem solving: the history, development, and implications for gifted education and talent development. Gift Child Q 49(4):342–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McComb C, Cagan J, Kotovsky K (2015) Lifting the veil: drawing insights about design teams from a cognitively-inspired computational model. Des Stud 40:119–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McComb C, Cagan J, Kotovsky K (2015) Rolling with the punches: an examination of team performance in a design task subject to drastic changes. Des Stud 36(C):99–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fu K, Cagan J, Kotovsky K (2010) Design team convergence: the influence of example solution quality. J Mech Des 132(11):111005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Linsey JS, Markman AB, Wood KL (2012) Design by analogy: a study of the wordtree method for problem re-representation. J Mech Des 134(4):041009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jansson DG, Smith SM (1991) Design fixation. Des Stud 12(1):3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sio UN, Kotovsky K, Cagan J (2015) Fixation or inspiration? A meta-analytic review of the role of examples on design processes. Des Stud 39:70–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Linsey JS, Tseng I, Fu K, Cagan J, Wood KL, Schunn C (2010) A study of design fixation, its mitigation and perception in engineering design faculty. J Mech Des 132(4):41003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hey J, Linsey J, Agogino aM, Wood KL (2008) Analogies and metaphors in creative design. Int J Eng Educ 24(2):283–294

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shah JJ, Smith SM, Vargas-Hernandez N (2003) Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Des Stud 24(2):111–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dong A, Hill AW, Agogino AM (2004) A document analysis method for characterizing design team performance. J Mech Des 126(3):378

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) under grant No. FA9550-16-1-0049 and grant No. FA9550-18-1-0088. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Cagan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gyory, J.T., Cagan, J., Kotovsky, K. (2019). An Exploration of the Effects of Managerial Intervention on Engineering Design Team Performance. In: Gero, J. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition '18. DCC 2018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05363-5_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05363-5_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05362-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05363-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics