Fake Comment Detection Based on Time Series and Density Peaks Clustering

  • Ruitong Di
  • Hong WangEmail author
  • Youli Fang
  • Ying Zhou
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11338)


This paper proposes a fake comment recognition method based on time series and density peaks clustering. Firstly, an anomaly recognition model based on multi-dimensional time series is constructed. Secondly, according to the idea of multi-scale features, seven benchmark-scale and corresponding subdivision-scale features are extracted hierarchically, and further, 49 features are finally obtained. At last, an optimized detection model based on density peaks clustering is proposed for identifying the fake comments, so as to improve the anti-noise ability of our method. The effectiveness of our proposed method is verified by several experiments, with the AUC value reaching 92%.


Fake review Time series Multi-scale Noise Density peaks clustering 



This work is supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 61672329, No. 61373149, No. 61472233, No. 61572300, No. 81273704), Shandong Provincial Project of Education Scientific Plan (No. ZK1437B010).


  1. 1.
    Jindal, N., Liu, B.: Opinion spam and analysis. In: International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 219–230. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chang, T., Hsu, P.Y., Cheng, M.S., Chung, C.Y., Chung, Y.L.: Detecting fake review with rumor model—Case study in hotel review. In: He, X., et al. (eds.) IScIDE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9243, pp. 181–192. Springer, Cham (2015). Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li, J., Ott, M., Cardie, C., et al.: Towards a general rule for identifying deceptive opinion spam. In: Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1566–1576 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li, H., Liu, B., Mukherjee, A., et al.: Spotting fake reviews using positive-unlabeled learning. Computacion Y Sistemas 18(3), 467–475 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Song, H.X., Yan, X., Yu, Z.T., et al.: Detection of fake reviews based on adaptive clustering. J. Nanjing Univ. 49(4), 433–438 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gao, J., Dong, Y.W., Shang, M., et al.: Group-based ranking method for online rating systems with spamming attacks. EPL 110(2), 1–6 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Husna, H., Phithakkitnukoon, S., Palla, S., et al.: Behavior analysis of spam botnets (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Craigmile, P.F.: All of statistics: a concise course in statistical inference. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. 168(1), 203–204 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rodriguez, A., Laio, A.: Clustering by fast search and find of density peaks. Science 344(6191), 1492 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ren, Y., Yin, L., Ji, D.: Deceptive reviews detection based on language structure and sentiment polarity. J. Front. Comput. Sci. Technol. 8(3), 313–320 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shao, Z., Ji, D.: Spotting fake reviewers based on sentiment features and users’ relationship. Comput. Appl. Softw. 33(5), 158–161 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruitong Di
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hong Wang
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Youli Fang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ying Zhou
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Information Science and EngineeringShandong Normal UniversityJinanChina
  2. 2.Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Distributed Computer Software Novel TechnologyJinanChina
  3. 3.Institute of Biomedical SciencesShandong Normal UniversityJinanChina

Personalised recommendations