Skip to main content

Reduced Sense of Agency in Human-Robot Interaction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Robotics (ICSR 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11357))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the presence of others, sense of agency (SoA), i.e. the perceived relationship between our own actions and external events, is reduced. This effect is thought to contribute to diffusion of responsibility. The present study aimed at examining humans’ SoA when interacting with an artificial embodied agent. Young adults participated in a task alongside the Cozmo robot (Anki Robotics). Participants were asked to perform costly actions (i.e. losing various amounts of points) to stop an inflating balloon from exploding. In 50% of trials, only the participant could stop the inflation of the balloon (Individual condition). In the remaining trials, both Cozmo and the participant were in charge of preventing the balloon from bursting (Joint condition). The longer the players waited before pressing the “stop” key, the smaller amount of points that was subtracted. However, in case the balloon burst, participants would lose the largest amount of points. In the joint condition, no points were lost if Cozmo stopped the balloon. At the end of each trial, participants rated how much control they perceived over the outcome of the trial. Results showed that when participants successfully stopped the balloon, they rated their SoA lower in the Joint than in the Individual condition, independently of the amount of lost points. This suggests that interacting with robots affects SoA, similarly to interacting with other humans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Murphy, R.R., Nomura, T., Billard, A., Burke, J.L.: Human-robot interaction. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 17(2), 85–89 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2010.936953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wiese, E., Metta, G., Wykowska, A.: Robots as intentional agents: using neuroscientific methods to make robots appear more social. Front. Psychol. 8, 1663 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kompatsiari, K., Tikhanoff, V., Ciardo, F., Metta, G., Wykowska, A.: The importance of mutual gaze in human-robot interaction. In: Kheddar, A., et al. (eds.) ICSR 2017. LNCS, vol. 10652, pp. 443–452. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70022-9_44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Wykowska, A., Chaminade, T., Cheng, G.: Embodied artificial agents for understanding human social cognition. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371(1693), 20150375 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Darley, J.M., Latane, B.: Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 8(4p1), 377–383 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chekroun, P., Brauer, M.: The bystander effect and social control behavior: the effect of the presence of others on people’s reactions to norm violations. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 32(6), 853–867 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Karau, S.J., Williams, K.D.: Social loafing: a meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65(4), 681–706 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wallach, M.A., Kogan, N., Bem, D.J.: Diffusion of responsibility and level of risk taking in groups. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 68(3), 263–274 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bradley, G.L.: Group influences upon preferences for personal protection: a simulation study. J. Saf. Res. 26(2), 99–105 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bandura, A., Underwood, B., Fromson, M.E.: Disinhibition of aggression through diffusion of responsibility and dehumanization of victims. J. Res. Pers. 9(4), 253–269 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Meier, B.P., Hinsz, V.B.: A comparison of human aggression committed by groups and individuals: an interindividual–intergroup discontinuity. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 40(4), 551–559 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bandura, A.: Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50(2), 248–287 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Beyer, F., Sidarus, N., Bonicalzi, S., Haggard, P.: Beyond self-serving bias: diffusion of responsibility reduces sense of agency and outcome monitoring. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 12(1), 138–145 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Beyer, F., Sidarus, N., Fleming, S., Haggard, P.: Losing control in social situations: how the presence of others affects neural processes related to sense of agency. eNeuro 5(1) (2018). https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0336-17.2018. ENEURO-0336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Frith, C.D.: Action, agency and responsibility. Neuropsychologia 55, 137–142 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. van der Woerdt, S., Haselager, P.: When robots appear to have a mind: the human perception of machine agency and responsibility. New Ideas Psychol. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2017.11.001

  17. Kim, T., Hinds, P.: Who should I blame? Effects of autonomy and transparency on attributions in human-robot interaction. In: IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication 2006 (ROMAN 2006). IEEE Publishing, Hatfield/New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pfister, R., Obhi, S.S., Rieger, M., Wenke, D.: Action and perception in social contexts: intentional binding for social action effects. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 667 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Obhi, S.S., Hall, P.: Sense of agency and intentional binding in joint action. Exp. Brain Res. 211(3–4), 655–662 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cozmo SDK installation for Windows. https://cozmosdk.anki.com/docs/install-windows.html

  21. Cozmo Quick Tap. https://github.com/anki/cozmo-pythonsdk/blob/master/examples/apps/quick_tap.py

  22. Android Debug Bridge. cozmosdk.anki.com/docs/adb.html

  23. Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., Theeuwes, J.: OpenSesame: an open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 44(2), 314–324 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., et al.: lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 (Version 1.1-7) (2014). http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html

  25. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P.B., Christensen, R.H.B.: lmerTest: tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models (Version 2.029) (2015). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/index.html

  26. Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.J.: An Introduction to the Bootstrap. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant awarded to A. Wykowska, titled “InStance: Intentional Stance for Social Attunement. Grant agreement No: 715058).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Ciardo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ciardo, F., De Tommaso, D., Beyer, F., Wykowska, A. (2018). Reduced Sense of Agency in Human-Robot Interaction. In: Ge, S., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11357. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05204-1_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05204-1_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05203-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05204-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics