Abstract
The aim of this chapter is threefold. First, I describe the intellectual origins of autoethnography. Second, I define autoethnography as a method for social inquiry. Third, I describe the layout of this book. This chapter is intended to foreground the subsequent chapters, which draw on my fieldwork in Palestine to offer glimpses into how I have leveraged autoethnography in my own work, as both a method and a form of writing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Carolyn Ellis (2004) notes that while David Hayano is often credited with coining the term in 1979, autoethnography was used years earlier by anthropologist Karl Heider.
- 2.
More generally, scholars have invoked reflexivity to call upon researchers to be explicit about the ontological and the epistemological assumptions of their arguments as well as the methodological choices that they make (Fournier & Grey, 2000).
References
Bochner, A. P. (2016). Notes toward an ethics of memory in autoethnographic inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & M. D. Giardina (Eds.), Ethical futures in qualitative research: Decolonizing the politics of knowledge (pp. 197–208). New York: Routledge.
Cixous, H. (1976). The laugh of the Medusa (K. Cohen & P. Cohen, Trans.). Signs, 1(4), 875–893.
Collinson, J. A., & Hockey, J. (2005). Autoethnography: Self-indulgence or rigorous methodology. In M. McNamee (Ed.), Philosophy and the sciences of exercise, health and sport: Critical perspectives on research methods (pp. 177–191). New York: Routledge.
Ellis, C. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Historical Social Research, 36(4), 273–290.
Fotaki, M., Metcalfe, B., & Harding, N. (2014). Writing materiality into management and organization studies through and with Luce Irigaray. Human Relations, 67(10), 1239–1263.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon.
Fournier, V., & Grey, C. (2000). At the critical moment: Conditions and prospects for critical management studies. Human Relations, 53(1), 7–32.
Freshwater, D., Cahill, J., Walsh, E., & Muncey, T. (2010). Qualitative research as evidence: Criteria for rigour and relevance. Journal of Research in Nursing, 15(6), 497–508.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
Hayano, D. M. (1979). Auto-ethnography: Paradigms, problems, and prospects. Human Organization, 38(1), 99–104.
Holt, N. L. (2003). Representation, legitimation, and autoethnography: An autoethnographic writing story. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(1), 18–28.
Humphreys, M. (2005). Getting personal: Reflexivity and autoethnographic vignettes. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(6), 840–860.
Lapadat, J. C. (2017). Ethics in autoethnography and collaborative autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(8), 589–603.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Le Roux, C. S. (2017). Exploring rigour in autoethnographic research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(2), 195–207.
Morgan, G., & Smircich, L. (1980). The case for qualitative research. Academy of Management Review, 5(4), 491–500.
Phillips, M., Pullen, A., & Rhodes, C. (2014). Writing organization as gendered practice: Interrupting the libidinal economy. Organization Studies, 35(3), 313–333.
Pullen, A. (2006). Gendering the research self: Social practice and corporeal multiplicity in the writing of organizational research. Gender, Work and Organization, 13(3), 277–298.
Salzman, P. C. (2002). On reflexivity. American Anthropologist, 104(3), 805–813.
Tolich, M. (2010). A critique of current practice: Ten foundational guidelines for autoethnographers. Qualitative Health Research, 20(12), 1599–1610.
Ulus, E. (2015). Workplace emotions in postcolonial spaces: Enduring legacies, ambivalence, and subversion. Organization, 22(6), 890–908.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Prasad, A. (2019). Introduction to Autoethnography. In: Autoethnography and Organization Research. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05099-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05099-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05098-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05099-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)