Skip to main content

Introduction: Civil Resistance in Contexts of Violent Conflict in Latin America—Leveraging Power to Defend One’s Rights

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Studies of the Americas ((STAM))

Abstract

This introductory chapter presents a general overview of the edited volume. It defines key concepts, such as “civil resistance” and “violent conflict”, and explains the relevance of studying civil resistance in contexts of violent conflict in Latin America. It argues that nonviolent resistance has become a key way for grievance groups to develop and wield power to defend their rights and achieve social change. These groups have engaged in nonviolent resistance to achieve different objectives, including fighting against authoritarianism, armed violence, and the possible destruction of their natural resources, culture or ancestral territory. They have also faced different opponents and used different strategies and methods to achieve their objectives. This chapter also briefly talks about the contributors’ research methodology and ends with a brief description of each chapter to guide readers through the book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Here “powerful” refers to power in its traditional sense. This said, we share the view of other civil resistance scholars who reject the narrow definition of power as domination and consider other forms of power, including “power within”, “power with” and “power to” (e.g. Speck 2014). Such a conceptualization of power is key to understanding how ordinary citizens have been able to collapse actors with significant material capabilities through civil resistance (e.g. Sharp 1990).

  2. 2.

    Note that some authors (e.g. Ackerman and Kruegler 1994; Chenoweth and Stephan 2011) define a situation in which opponents use violence against nonviolent resisters as one of “nonviolent conflict”. We differ with these authors for two main reasons. First, according to other authors, especially from peace and conflict studies, the term “violent conflict” refers to conflicts that involve the use of direct violence, even if one-sided. Second, the use of direct violence, even if one-sided, makes it more challenging for grievance groups to achieve their objectives than if all sides would refrain from employing direct violence. For instance, Erica Chenoweth and Maria Stephan (2011) found that violent repression decreased the chance of success of resistance movements by 35%. This said, we believe that it is crucial to distinguish situations of violent conflict in which grievance groups use direct violence (violent resistance) from those in which these groups only use nonviolent means (nonviolent resistance). As we will discuss a little below, scholars, such as Chenoweth and Stephan, indeed found that the latter type of struggle had much better odds of success than the former.

  3. 3.

    See the definitions used by the Uppsala Conflict Data Program at: http://www.pcr.uu.se/research/ucdp/definitions/ (last visited on 12 October 2018).

  4. 4.

    It is worthy to note, though, the publication of a special issue of the Middle Atlantic Review of Latin American Studies on civil resistance in Latin America in 2018. See https://www.marlasjournal.com/15/volume/2/issue/1/ (last visited on 28 August 2018).

References

  • Ackerman, Peter, and Christopher Kruegler. 1994. Strategic Nonviolent Conflict: The Dynamics of People Power in the Twentieth Century. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, Sonia E., Evelyn Dagnino, and Arturo Escobar, eds. 1998. Cultures of Politics, Politics of Cultures: Re-visioning Latin American Social Movements. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyerle, Shaazka. 2014. Curtailing Corruption: People Power for Accountability and Justice. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenoweth, Erica, and Kathleen G. Cunningham. 2013. Understanding Nonviolent Resistance: An Introduction. Journal of Peace Research 50 (3): 271–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chenoweth, Erica, and Maria J. Stephan. 2011. Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisas, Vicenç. 2004. Procesos de paz y negociación en conflictos armados. Barcelona: Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, Johan. 1969. Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research 6 (3): 167–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. Cultural Violence. Journal of Peace Research 27 (3): 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallward, Maia, Juan Masullo, and Cécile Mouly. 2017. Civil Resistance in Armed Conflict: Leveraging Nonviolent Action to Navigate War, Oppose Violence and Confront Oppression. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 12 (3): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/15423166.2017.1376431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, Esperanza. 2004. Resistencia civil artesana de paz: Experiencias indígenas, afro descendientes y campesinas. Bogotá: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Intervenir antes de que anochezca: Mediaciones, intermediaciones y diplomacias no violentas de base social en el conflicto armado. Bogotá: La Bastilla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, Esperanza, and Cécile Mouly. Forthcoming-a. “Namakasia yaqui”: resistencia civil por la defensa del agua.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, eds. Forthcoming-b. Resistencias noviolentas en contextos de alta conflictividad en América Latina: Experiencias en México, Brasil, Colombia y fronteras. Bogotá / Quito: Universidad de La Salle / FLACSO Ecuador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, Esperanza, and María Salazar. 1999. Con la esperanza intacta: experiencias comunitarias de resistencia civil noviolenta. Bogotá: Arte y Folito.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Oliver. 2017a. The Art of Rhetorical Traps in Civilian Self-Protection. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 12 (3): 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/15423166.2017.1369451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017b. Resisting War: How Communities Protect Themselves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Brian. 2015. Nonviolence Unbound. Sparsnäs: Irene.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masullo, Juan. 2017. A Theory of Civilian Noncooperation with Armed Groups. Civilian Agency and Self-Protection in the Colombian Civil War. Unpublished PhD thesis, European University Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus, Philip, and Gerald W. Schlabach. 2004. Relentless Persistence: Nonviolent Action in Latin America. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouly, Cécile, Esperanza Hernández, and María Belén Garrido. 2016. Armed Actors’ Responses to Civil Resistance in Three War-Affected Communities in Colombia. Paper presented at the 57th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association (ISA), Atlanta, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkman, Patricia. 1990. Insurrectionary Civic Strikes in Latin America: 1931–1961. Cambridge, MA: Albert Einstein Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schock, Kurt. 2012. Land Struggles in the Global South: Strategic Innovations in Brazil and India. In Strategies for Social Change, ed. G.M. Maney, R.V. Kutz-Flamenbaum, D.A. Rohlinger, and J. Goodwin, 221–244. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. The Practice and Study of Civil Resistance. Journal of Peace Research 50 (3): 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343313476530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Rightful Radical Resistance: Mass Mobilization and Land Struggles in India and Brazil. Mobilization 20 (4): 493–515. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-20-4-493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, Gene. 1973. The Politics of Nonviolent Action (Part 2): The Methods of Nonviolent Action. Vol. 2. Boston: Porter Sargent.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. The Role of Power in Nonviolent Struggle, Monograph Series Number 3. Boston: The Albert Einstein Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. From Dictatorship to Democracy: A Conceptual Framework for Liberation. 4th ed. Boston: The Albert Einstein Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speck, Andreas. 2014. Nonviolence and Power. War Resisters’ International Handbook. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahler-Sholk, Richard, Harry E. Vanden, and Glen David Kuecker, eds. 2008. Latin American Social Movements in the Twenty-First Century: Resistance, Power, and Democracy. Lanham, MA: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zunes, Stephan, Hardy Merriman, and Maria J. Stephan. 2017. Nonviolent Struggle. In The International Studies Encyclopedia, ed. R.A. Denemark. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cécile Mouly .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mouly, C., Hernández Delgado, E. (2019). Introduction: Civil Resistance in Contexts of Violent Conflict in Latin America—Leveraging Power to Defend One’s Rights. In: Mouly, C., Hernández Delgado, E. (eds) Civil Resistance and Violent Conflict in Latin America. Studies of the Americas. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05033-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics