Abstract
Intersectional interventions are needed to match and address the needs of the marginalised in social life. Our focus is on the voiceless as they become displaced and vulnerable as a result of losing habitat or homes. We begin with some deliberations by Janet in which she summarises her conceptual background to this argument and then explains the importance of practising research to address social and ecological justice. This is followed by her creation of a hypothetical vignette which serves to illustrate options for systemic intervention. We conclude the paper and draw together key points made in the book. Norma engages with Janet’s vignette and explanation of ways to expand pragmatism by thinking through the consequences of our choices. A key message for the conclusion and the two volume series is the importance of combining approaches in response to areas of concern. Norma suggests ways of ‘stretching’ different paradigmatic/philosophical bases for doing research responsibly to address complex issues, including ways of practising multiple and mixed methods research that focus on a transformative agenda.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Susan Casey’s 2015 ‘Voices in the Ocean’ Random House. New York.
- 2.
Rincon, P. Neanderthals were capable of making art http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-43115488 $$ is Rincon, P and author writing on a date—give the date and also put in the ref list http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-43115488 accessed 27 February 2018.
- 3.
- 4.
Wicked problems are complex (Flood and Carson 1993) and, drawing on Rittel and Webber (1984), can be defined as comprising many interrelated variables that are perceived differently by different stakeholders and that need to be addressed critically and systemically within context (McIntyre-Mills 2014, 2017).
- 5.
The distinction between multiple and mixed approaches is laid out by Hesse-Biber and Griffin (2015). They explain that multiple approaches imply using similar kinds of data measurement (such as quantitative or qualitative), while mixed approaches imply using different kinds (e.g. quantitative mixed with qualitative).
References
Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy. What is the problem represented to be? Frenchs Forest: Pearson.
Cram, F., & Mertens, D. M. (2015). Transformative and indigenous frameworks for multimethod and mixed methods research. In S. Hesse-Biber & R. B. Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 91–109). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Casey, S. (2015). Voices in the Ocean. New York: Random House.
Chilisa, B. (2012). Indigenous research methodologies. London: Sage.
Chilisa, B., Major, T. E., & Khudu-Petersen, K. (2017). Community engagement with a postcolonial, African-based relational paradigm. Qualitative Research, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117696176.
Churchman, C. W. (1979). The systems approach and its enemies. New York: Basic Books.
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
Dhamoon, R. K. (2011). Considerations on mainstreaming intersectionality. Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912910379227.
Flood, R., & Carson, E. (1993). Dealing with complexity: An introduction to the theory and application of systems science (2nd ed.). London: Plenum.
Gergen, K. J. (2015). From mirroring to worldmaking: Research as future forming. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45(3), 287–310.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., & Schwartzman, S. (1994). The new production of knowledge. London: Sage.
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2015). Mixed methods research: The “thing-ness” problem. Qualitative Health Research, 25(6), 775–788.
Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Griffin, A. J. (2015). Feminist approaches to multimethod and mixed method research: Theory and praxis. In S. Hesse-Biber & R. B. Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 72–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Lawrence, A., & Spence, G. (2009). The elephant whisperer. London: Sidgwick & Jackson Ltd.
McIntyre-Mills, J. (2010). Wellbeing, mindfulness and the global commons. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 17(7–8), 44–72.
McIntyre-Mills, J. (2014a). Systemic ethics to support wellbeing. Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics (pp. 1–12), 26 Feb 2014 (Latest version). ‘Early view. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_342-6# Dordrecht: Springer, 2013. http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_342-6 Co-determination; Interconnectedness; Interdependency; Interrelatedness.
McIntyre-Mills, J. (2014b). Reconsidering boundaries. Sociopedia, International Sociological Association, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056846014102.
McIntyre-Mills, J. (2014c). Systemic ethics and non-anthropocentric stewardship. New York: Springer.
McIntyre-Mills, J., De Vries, & Binchai, N. (2014). Transformation from wall street to wellbeing. New York: Springer, 253.
McIntyre-Mills, & Wirawan. (2017). Governing the Anthropocene: through balancing individualism and collectivism as a way to manage our ecological footprint’. In J. McIntyre-Mills, N. Romm, & Y. Corcoran-Nantes (Eds.), Balancing individualism and collectivism: Social and environmental justice (pp. 75–95). New York: Springer.
Mertens, D. M. (2007). Transformative considerations: Inclusion and social justice. American Journal of Evaluation, 28(1), 86–90.
Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. New York: Guilford Press.
Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Mertens, D. M. (2016). Advancing social change in South Africa through transformative research. South African Review of Sociology, 47(1), 5–17.
Pauli, G. (2010). The blue economy: Report to the Club of Rome. Taos: Paradigm Publications.
Pert, C. (1999). The molecules of emotion: Why you feel the way you feel. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
Popper, K. R. (1969). Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge.
Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1984). Planning problems are wicked problems: Developments in design methodology. Chichester: Wiley.
Romm, N. R. A. (2015). Reviewing the transformative paradigm: A critical systemic and relational (Indigenous) lens. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 28(5), 411–427.
Romm, N. R. A. (2017). Researching Indigenous ways of knowing-and-being: Revitalizing relational quality of living. In P. Ngulube (Ed.), Handbook of research on theoretical perspectives on Indigenous Knowledge Systems in developing countries (pp. 22–48). Hershey: IGI Global.
Romm, N. R. A. (2018). Responsible research practice: Revisiting transformative paradigm in social research. Cham: Springer.
Shanor, K., & Kanwal, J. (2009). Bats sing and mice giggle: Revealing the secret lives of Smith, A. 1776 The Wealth of Nations. Retrieved from http://political-economy.com/wealth-of-nations-adam-smith/toengagecomments
Smith, A. (1776). The wealth of nations. Bantam Classic, Edited 2003; with notes and summary by Edwin Cannan; preface by Alan B. Kruege. Cited by Branko’s blog.
United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). (2007). Accessed 14 Feb 2016 at: https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/wpcontent/uploads/sites/19/2018/11/UNDRIP_E_web.pdf
Waal, D. (2006). Part 1: Morally evolved. In S. Macedo & J. Ober (Eds.), Primates and philosophers. How morality evolved. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Walsh, E. (2016, June 8). https://intercontinentalcry.org/need-intersectionality-understand-climate-change/
Wane, N. N., Akena, F. A., & Ilmi, A. A. (2014). Introduction. In N. N. Wane, F. A. Akena, & A. A. Ilmi (Eds.), Spiritual discourse in the academy (pp. 1–11). New York: Peter Lang.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McIntyre-Mills, J., Romm, N.R.A. (2019). Conclusion: Potential for Transformative Research to Address Risks. In: McIntyre-Mills, J., Romm, N.R.A., Corcoran-Nantes, Y. (eds) Democracy and Governance for Resourcing the Commons. Contemporary Systems Thinking. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04891-4_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04891-4_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04890-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04891-4
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)