Skip to main content

Governance of Surakarta’s Informal Sector: Implications for the Empowerment of Marginalized Stakeholders

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Democracy and Governance for Resourcing the Commons

Part of the book series: Contemporary Systems Thinking ((CST))

  • 416 Accesses

Abstract

Street vending is one of informal sectors growing in Surakarta City of Indonesia. Officials in the Surakarta City Government claimed that the beauty of the city was worsening from increasing street vending activities. Using the political language of ‘empowerment of the poor’, the government decided to relocate about one thousand street vendors to a newly built ‘traditional’ market allocated for them in a location where known prostitution motions had been operated for decades. Formally the policy was intended to improve the street vendors’ livelihoods and ensure their future. Using ethnographic methods, the study found that the street vendors rejected the policy until the city government met all their demands or at least that the prostitution doings should be cleared from the offered relocation area. The city government then co-opted the leaders of the street vendors and of the prostitutes and procurers to support its policy. The policy implementation caused declines in the livelihoods of the powerless street vendors and former prostitutes and procurers. The city government had pledged that former procurers would be given rights to parcels of state-owned land that they had occupied, in some cases for decades, and former prostitutes given financial compensation. However, these promises were not kept and the lives of those who had earned their living in the prostitution trade deteriorated as they became unemployed. It was members of the Islamic-based local community with a concern for the lives of these marginalized people who acted to develop social capital to produce an alternative governance and empowerment for them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adhikari, D. B. (2011). Income generation in informal sector: A case study of the street vendors of Kathmandu Metropolitan City. Economic Journal of Development Issues, 13–14(1–2), Combined issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. E. (1990). Public policy making an introduction (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelini, J., & Hirose, K. (2004). Extension of social security coverage for the informal economy in Indonesia, Working Paper 11. Manila: International Labour Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhowmik, S. K. (2005). Street vendors in Asia: A review. Economic and Political Weekly, May 28-June 4(2005), 2256–2264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002). Social capital and community governance. The Economic Journal, 112, 419–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookings, J. B., & Bolton, B. (2000). Confirmatory factor analysis of a measure of intrapersonal empowerment. Rehabilitation Psychology, 45, 292–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/0090-5550.45.3.292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (2001). Conviction seeking efficacy: Sustainable agriculture and the politics of co-optation. Agriculture and Human Values, 18(4), 353–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts?: Putting the first last. Bath: Intermediate Technology Publications, The Bath Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1993). Year 501: The conquest continues. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corntassel, J. (2007). Partnership in Action? Indigenous political mobilization and co-optation during the first UN indigenous decade (1995–2004). Human Rights Quarterly, 29, 137–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, J. C. (2000). Street vendors, modernity and postmodernity: Conflict and compromise in the global economy. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 20(1–2), 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhlamini, J. P. (2015). Transformation and empowerment of the disadvantaged township women through adult basic education and training (ABET). Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 6(2), 177–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, H. (1968). Power and discontent. Homewood: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, H. (1975). The strategy of social protest. Homewood: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handayani, S. (2006). Merajut Harapan Menuju Masa Depan. Surakarta: KOMPIP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermanto, Z. (1995). Gambaran Umum Potensi dan Masalah Ekonomi dan Sosial Sektor Informal di Perkotaan. In C. M. Firdausy (Ed.), Pengembangan Sektor Informal Pedagang Kaki Lima di Perkotaa. Jakarta: LIPI.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO. (2002). Women and men in the informal economy. Geneva: ILO, Employment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee, D., & Howard, P. H. (2009). Corporate cooptation of organic and fair trade standards. Agriculture and Human Values, 27(4), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-009-9231-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H. (2009). Equity in development: Why it is important and how to achieve it. Working Paper 311, Results of ODI research presented in preliminary form for discussion and critical comment, November. London: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantor Pengelolaan PKL Kota Surakarta. (2003). Laporan Akhir Studi Pemetaan Pedagang Kaki Lima Kota Surakarta Tahun 2003, Kerjasama Kantor Pengelolaan PKL Kota Surakarta dengan Pusat Pengkajian dan Pelatihan Ekonomi Fakultas Ekonomi UNS, Surakarta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayuni, M. H., & Tambulasi, R. (2009). Political transitions and vulnerability of street vending in Malawi. Theoretical and Empirical Research in Urban Management, 3(12), 78–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwok, J. (2004). Social welfare, social capital and social work: Personal reflection of a hongkong social worker. Journal of Social Policy and Social Work, 8(March), 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, C. H., Peters, B. G., & Thompson, F. J. (1990). Public administration: Challenges, choices. In Consequences. London: Scott.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre-Mills. (2006). Systemic governance and accountability: Working and re-working the conceptual and spatial boundaries (Vol. 3). Adelaide: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, S. T., & Hartmann, L. C. (2002). Generalizability of Menson’s empowerment scale: Replication and extension with Australian data. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 2, 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595802002002860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monte, M. & da Silva, T. M. (2013). Informal Street Vendors in Rio de Janeiro Case study of three formalization process. Resourceful Cities Berlin (Germany), August 29-31, 2013. http://www.rc21.org/conferences/berlin2013/RC21-Berlin-Post/09-2-Monte.pdf

  • Mramba, N. R. (2014). The conception of street vending business (SVB) in income poverty reduction in Tanzania. International Business Research, 8(5), 120–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J., & Cauch, J. (2006). Empowering communities! Who are we kidding? Paper presented at The Empowerment Conference with Noel Pearson, Melbourne May 16–17, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Njaya, T. (2014). Challenges of negotiating sectoral governance of street vending sector in Harare metropolitan. Zimbabwe Asian Journal of Economic Modelling, 2(2), 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussabaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pakpahan, M. (2010). Welfare state, the 1945 constitution, and industrial relation. Journal of Administration Science & Organization, 17(3), 209–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pena, S. (1999). Informal markets: Street vendors in Mexico City. Habitat International, 23(3), 363–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilger, J. (2002). The new rulers of the world. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratchett, L. (2004). Local autonomy, local democracy and the ‘new localism’. Political Studies, 52, 358–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J. (2003). Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science, 32, 1912–1914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachbini, D. J., & Hamid, A. (1994). Ekonomi Informal Indonesia (Indonesia’s informal economy). Jakarta: LP3S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachmawati, T. (2014). Informal sector and local government revenue: The contribution of street vendors. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 11(1), 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandhaas, B. (2008). The integrated women’s empowerment programme as an example for establishing basic structures of a nationwide adult education system in a poor country. Convergence, 41, 99–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanginga, P. C., Kamugisha, R. N., & Martin, A. M. (2007). The dynamics of social capital and conflict management in multiple resource regimes: a case of the southwestern highlands of Uganda. Ecology and Society, 12(1), 6. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art6/

  • Schaffer, K., & Smith, S. (2004). Human rights and narrated lives: The ethics of recognition. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1949/1966). TVA and the grass roots. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suparno, I., Ismunandar, K., & Rochimah, T. N. (2005). Masih Dalam Posisi Pinggiran, Solidaritas Perempuan untuk Kemanusiaan dan HakAsasi Manusia (SPEK-HAM), Solo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumpy, A. J. (2008). Subject to negotiation: The mechanisms behind co-optation and corporate reform. Social Problems, 55(4), 480–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsey, K. (2008). Tackling endemic substance abuse among Indigenous Australians: The contribution of values-based family empowerment education. The Forum on Public Policy [Internet]. Retrieved from http://forumonpublicpolicy.com/spring2010.vol2010/spring2010archive/tsey.australia.pdf

  • Tucker, J., & Ludi, E. (2012). Empowerment and equity. Promoting pro-poor growth: The role of empowerment. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnecke, T. I., & DeRuyter, A. (2008). Paternalism and development: Expanding the analysis of welfare regimes in southern Europe and Asia, Rollins College Department of Economics, Winter Park, FL. Working paper 311. London: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sudarmo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sudarmo (2019). Governance of Surakarta’s Informal Sector: Implications for the Empowerment of Marginalized Stakeholders. In: McIntyre-Mills, J., Romm, N.R.A., Corcoran-Nantes, Y. (eds) Democracy and Governance for Resourcing the Commons. Contemporary Systems Thinking. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04891-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics