A New Approach for State Estimation

  • Eduardo Souza de CursiEmail author
  • Rafael Holdorf Lopez
  • André Gustavo Carlon
Part of the PoliTO Springer Series book series (PTSS)


We present a new method for the state estimation, based on uncertainty quantification (UQ), which allows efficient numerical determination of probability distributions. We adapt these methods in order to allow the representation of the probability distribution of the state. By assuming that the mean corresponds to real state (i.e; that there is no bias in measurements), the state is estimated. UQ determines expansions of an unknown random variable as functions of given ones. The distributions may be quite general—namely, Gaussian/normality assumptions are not necessary. In the framework of state estimation, the natural given variables are the measurement errors, which may be partially or totally unknown. We examine these situations and we show that an artificial variable may be used instead the real one. We examine three approaches for the determination of the probability distribution of the state: moment matching (MM), collocation (COL) and variational (VAR). We show that the method is effective to calculate by using two significant examples: a classical discrete linear system containing difficulties and the Influenza in a boarding school. In all these examples, the proposed approach was able to accurately estimate the values of the state variables. The approach may also be used for non-additive noise and for the determination of the distribution of the noise.


Uncertainty quantification Stochastic models Variability Reliability 



This work is partially financed by the European Union with the European regional development fund (ERDF) and by the Normandie Regional Council.


  1. 1.
    Kalman RE (1960) A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Trans ASME J Basic Eng 82(D):35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Evensen G (2009) Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics. J Geophys Res 99:10143–10162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Estumano D, Orlande H, Colaco M, Dulikravich G (2013) State estimation problem for Hodgkin-Huxley’s model: a comparison of particle filter algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 4th inverse problems, design and optimization symposium (IPDO-2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Madankan R, Singla P, Singh T, Scott PD (2013) Polynomial-chaos-based bayesian approach for state and parameter estimations. J Guid Contl Dyn 36(4):1058–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wiener N (1938) The homogeneous chaos. Amer J Math 60(23–26):897–936MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xiu D, Karniadakis GE (2002) The wiener-askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations. SIAM J Sci Comput 24(2):619–644MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lopez RH, de Cursi ES, Lemosse D (2011) Approximating the probability density function of the optimal point of an optimization problem. Eng Optim 43(3):281–303MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lopez RH, Miguel LFF, de Cursi ES (2013) Uncertainty quantification for algebraic systems of equations. Comput Struct 128:89–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Cursi ES (2015) Uncertainty quantification and stochastic modelling with matlab. ISTE Press, London and Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    de Cursi ES, Lopez RH, Carlon AC (2016) A new filter for state estimation. In: 18th scientific convention on engineering and architecture, La Havana, Cuba, Nov 2016Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lopez RH, de Cursi ES, Carlon AG (2017) A state estimation approach based on stochastic expansions. Comput Appl Math. Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bassi M, de Cursi ES, Ellaia R (2016) Generalized fourier series for representing random variables and application for quantifying uncertainties in optimization. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on stochastic modelling and uncertainty quantification (Uncertainties 2016).

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eduardo Souza de Cursi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rafael Holdorf Lopez
    • 2
  • André Gustavo Carlon
    • 2
  1. 1.Normandie Université - Laboratoire de Mécanique de Normandie – INSA Rouen NormandieSaint-Étienne-Du-RouvrayFrance
  2. 2.UFSCFlorianópolisBrazil

Personalised recommendations