Skip to main content

To Legislate or Not: That Is the Question—Comparing CSR Intent and Effects in Economies with Voluntary CSR and Legislated CSR

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Dimensions of Sustainable Management

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

Abstract

Multinational companies (MNCs) often debate whether or not corporate social responsibility (CSR) is worthwhile pursuing, whether it is a cost for mere window dressing or whether it is an investment with promising and interesting outcomes. On the other hand, governments debate whether CSR should be legislated or voluntary. Hence, while some MNCs engage in CSR voluntarily pursuing the benefits, other MNCs are ‘forced’ to engage in CSR—regardless if they believe in the concept or not. There are various examples and approaches. Among developed economies, for example, we find Sweden who does not have CSR legislation (yet the majority of Swedish MNCs are highly active in voluntary CSR) and Denmark, Germany and Canada with various degrees of industry-specific legislation. In emerging economies, we find, for instance, Mauritius, Indonesia and India legislated CSR to cover precise monetary contributions towards the social, economic and environmental development of these countries. Whether the global economy gravitates towards some degree of responsible capitalism or not, the discussion and arguments for and against mandatory CSR is likely to increase in the near future. To contribute to the debate, this chapter describes the differences between CSR among MNCs in Sweden (a developed economy believing in voluntary CSR) and India (an emerging economy) where CSR is mandatory by law. Our research indicates that MNCs in both economies (with voluntary or legislative CSR) strategically benefits from CSR and that CSR legislation positively affects MNCs in at least one emerging economy (India).

Paper submission to the International Conference on CSR, Germany, Cologne, 1st–3rd of August, 2016.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 717–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to CSR. Academy of Management Review, 32, 794–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1304–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beloe, S., Elkington, J., Prakash-mani, K., Thorpe, J., & Zollinger, P. (2004). Gearing up: From corporate social responsibility to good governance and scalable solutions. SustainAbility/Global Compact. www.sustainability.com

  • Bhowmick, N. (2014). 37% of all the illiterate adults in the world are Indian. Time World. Accessed February 10, 2014, from http://world.time.com/2014/01/29/indian-adult-illiteracy/

  • Brady, M. K., & Cronin, J. J., Jr. (2001). Customer orientation: Effects on customer service perceptions and outcome behaviors. Journal of Service Research, 3, 241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, B., & Mitra, N. (2016). Cases and developments after the legal mandate. In N. Mitra & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility in India. Basel: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeTienne, K., Agle, B., Phillips, J., & Ingerson, M.-C. (2012). The Impact of moral stress compared to other stressors on employee fatigue, job satisfaction, and turnover: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1984). The new meaning of corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 26, 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economic Times. (2015). Aditya Birla Group-owned idea cellular’s CSR spend remains zero. ETTelecom, September 30, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erin Reid, M., & Michael Toffel, W. (2009). Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 1157–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst & Young FICCI. (2012). Knowledge paper on skill development in India. Accessed February 10, 2014, from http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/FICCI_skill_report_2012_finalversion/$FILE/FICCI_skill_report_2012_finalversion_low_resolution.pdf

  • FICCI EY. (2015). Reaping India’s promised demographic dividend—Industry in driving seat. Ernst & Young (EY) and Federation of Indian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (FICCI). Accessed December 1, 2015, from http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY-Government-and-Public-Sector-Reaping-Indias-demographic-dividend/$FILE/EY-Reaping-Indias-promised-demographic-dividend-industry-in-driving-seat.pdf

  • Fombrun, C. J. (2000). Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review, 105(1), 85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebhardt, G. F., Carpenter, G. S., & Sherry, J. F. (2006). Creating a market orientation: A longitudinal, multifirm, grounded analysis of cultural transformation. Journal of Marketing, 70, 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of India Ministry of Finance. (2013). Report of the Inter-Ministerial Committee for boosting exports from MSME sector. Accessed June 1, 2015, from http://dgft.gov.in/exim/2000/imc-EXPORT-sme.pdf

  • Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 58–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Human Development Report. (2013). UNDP. Accessed December 31, 2016, from http://hdr.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/IND/

  • Indian Government Department of Public Enterprises. (2015). Guidelines on corporate social responsibility for central public sector enterprises. Government of India, Ministry of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises (Department of Public Enterprises). Accessed December 28, 2015, from http://dpe.nic.in/sites/upload_files/dpe/files/glch1223.pdf

  • Indian Institute of Corporate Affairs. (2014). CSR India: Ready Reckoner. Gurgaon: Centre for Institutional Partnerships and Communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaksson, L. (2012). CSR: A study of strategic management and performance. Doctoral Dissertation, Bond University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaksson, L., Kiessling, T., & Harvey, M. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: Why bother? Organizational Dynamics, 43, 64–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J. (2009). Corporate social responsibility? Not my business any more: The CEO horizon problem in corporate social performance. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2009(1).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S. (2007). Corporate social responsibility from an emerging market perspective: Evidences from the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry. University of St. Gallen, Business Dissertations. Accessed December 15, 2015, from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&;db=buh&;AN=64282075&;site=ehost-live&;scope=site

  • Kiessling, T., Isaksson, L., & Yasar, B. (2015). Market orientation and CSR: Performance implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 137, 269–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirca, A. H., Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, W. O. (2005). Market orientation: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 69, 24–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2011). KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2011. KPMG, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kytle, B., & Ruggie, J. G. (2005). Corporate social responsibility is risk management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, S. K., Kraus, F., & Ahearne, M. (2010). The diffusion of market orientation throughout the organization: A social learning theory perspective. Journal of Marketing, 74, 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levis, J. (2006). Adoption of corporate social responsibility codes by multinational companies. Journal of Asian Economies, 17, 50–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maira, A. (2004). Remaking India: One country, one destiny (Response Books) (1st ed.). New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly, J. E. (2012). Corporate social performance: A review of empirical research examining the corporation–society relationship using Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini social ratings data. Business & Society, 56, 796–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2011). Creating and capturing value. Journal of Management, 37, 1480–1495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1983). The case for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Strategy, 4, 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, N. (2014). Corporate social responsibility should contribute towards developing human capital – The India perspective. New Delhi: Excel India Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, N. (2015a). In pursuit of building the foundation for sustainability. In 2nd International Conference on CSR, Sustainability, Ethics and Governance. Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, China, International Centre for CSR and Sustainability.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, N. (2015b). Community engagement models in real estate – A case study of Tata Housing Development Company. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 5, 111–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, N. (2015c). Embedded corporate social responsibility through community engagement in the real estate sector of India: Case study of Tata Housing Development Limited. In Fourth International Conference on Global Business Economics, Finance and Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, N., & Schmidpeter, R. (2016). Cases and developments after the legal mandate. In N. Mitra & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility in India. Basel: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, S.-G., & de Leon, P. (2007). Contexts and corporate voluntary environmental behaviors: Examining the EPA’s green lights voluntary program. Organization Environment, 20, 480–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MSME. (2012). Government of India. Report of the Inter-Ministerial Committee for Boosting Exports from MSME Sector. Ministry of Finance. Accessed June 1, 2015, from http://dgft.gov.in/exim/2000/imc-EXPORT-sme.pdf

  • Muller, A. (2006). Global versus local CSR strategies. European Management Journal, 24, 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, K. B., & Montanari, J. R. (1986). Strategic management of the socially responsible firm: Integrating management and marketing theory. The Academy of Management Review, 11, 815–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilekani, R. (2011). Corporate social responsibility in India: No clear definition, but plenty of debate. Wharton University. Accessed January 10, 2016, from http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/corporate-social-responsibility-in-india-no-clear-definition-but-plenty-of-debate/

  • Porter, M. (2008). Managerial applications of corporate social responsibility and systems thinking for achieving sustainability outcomes. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 25, 397–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2006). Strategy & society. The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011, January–February). The big idea: Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • PriceWaterhouse Coopers PWC. (2013). Handbook on corporate social responsibility in India. Confederation of Indian Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramchander, S., Schwebach, R. G., & Staking, K. I. M. (2012). The informational relevance of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from Ds400 index reconstitutions. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 303–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, K. (2013). India’s poverty level falls to record 22%: Planning Commission. The Wall Street Journal and Live Mint. Accessed February 10, 2014, from http://www.livemint.com/Politics/1QvbdGnGySHo7WRq1NBFNL/Poverty-rate-down-to-22-Plan-panel.html

  • Ruekert, R. W. (1992). Developing a market orientation: An organizational strategy perspective. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 9, 225–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, J., & Benson, J. (2016). When CSR is a social norm: How socially responsible human resource management affects employee work behavior. Journal of Management, 42(6), 1723–1746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swedish-Institute. (2009). Sharing Sweden with the world. Swedish Institute. Accessed October 16, 2009, from http://www.si.se/English/Navigation/About-the-Swedish-Institute/

  • Tata. (2015). Leadership with trust. Accessed September 12, 2015, from http://www.tata.com/aboutus/sub_index/Leadership-with-trust

  • Tata Housing Imprints. (2015). Sustainability report 2013–2014. Accessed December 11, 2015, from http://www.tatahousing.in/csr/pdf/sr_imprints_2013_2014.pdf

  • UNESCO. (2014). Adult and youth literacy: National, regional and global trends, 1985–2015. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Accessed December 14, 2014, from http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/Documents/literacy-statistics-trends-1985-2015.pdf

  • Wieseke, J., Ahearne, M., Lam, S. K., & von Dick, R. (2009). The role of leaders in internal marketing. Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 123–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadek, S., & MacGillivray, A. (2008). The responsible competitiveness index.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Annexure: Schedule VII of the Companies Act, 2013

Annexure: Schedule VII of the Companies Act, 2013

1.1 Schedule VII of the Companies Act, 2013

  1. (i)

    Eradicating hunger, poverty and malnutrition, promoting preventive health care and sanitation, including contribution to the Swach Bharat Kosh set-up by the Central Government for the promotion of Sanitation and making available safe drinking water;

  2. (ii)

    Promoting education, including special education and employment enhancing vocational skills especially among children, women, elderly, and the differently-abled and livelihood enhancement projects;

  3. (iii)

    Promoting gender equality, empowering women, setting up homes and hostels for women and orphans; setting up old age homes, day care centres and such other facilities for senior citizens and measures for reducing inequalities faced by socially and economically backward groups;

  4. (iv)

    Ensuring environmental sustainability, ecological balance, protection of flora and fauna, animal welfare, agro-forestry, conservation of natural resources and maintaining quality of soil, air and water, including contribution to the Clean Ganga Fund set-up by the Central Government for the rejuvenation of river Ganga;

  5. (v)

    Protection of national heritage, art and culture including restoration of buildings and sites of historical importance and works of art; setting up public libraries; promotion and development of traditional arts and handicrafts;

  6. (vi)

    Measures for the benefit of armed forces veterans, war widows and their dependents;

  7. (vii)

    Training to promote rural sports, nationally recognised sports, para Olympic sports and Olympic sports;

  8. (viii)

    Contributions or funds provided to technology incubators located within academic institutions which are approved by the Central Government

  9. (ix)

    Rural development projects.

  10. (x)

    Slum development.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Isaksson, L., Mitra, N. (2019). To Legislate or Not: That Is the Question—Comparing CSR Intent and Effects in Economies with Voluntary CSR and Legislated CSR. In: Schmidpeter, R., Capaldi, N., Idowu, S.O., Stürenberg Herrera, A. (eds) International Dimensions of Sustainable Management. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04819-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics