Advertisement

Building Blocks in Standards: Improving Consistency in Standardization with Ontology and Reasoning

  • Marcello BalducciniEmail author
  • Claire Vishik
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11322)

Abstract

International standardization in ICT has grown in importance due to the rapid technology development, the increasing need for interoperability, and the global nature of the digital infrastructure. However, technical resources available to international standards bodies have become more limited. With its focus on international collaboration and consensus, the standardization community has not invested significantly in the automation of the process of developing standards. In this paper, we describe potential gains in efficiency with an ontology-based approach and automated reasoning. As part of the exploratory phase of the project, we built a prototype ontology and evaluated the benefits of automated reasoning to improve the process of developing and harmonizing broadly understood ICT assessment standards. The exploratory phase confirmed feasibility and clarified the benefits of the ontology-based approach to standardization, but also highlighted difficulties and unsolved problems in this area.

Keywords

Assessment standards Ontology Knowledge engineering Automated reasoning 

References

  1. Alobaidi, M., Malik, K.M., Hussain, M.: Automated ontology generation framework powered by linked biomedical ontologies for disease-drug domain. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 165, 117–128 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boje, D.M. (ed.): Organizational Change and Global Standardization Solutions to Standards and Norms Overwhelming Organizations. Routledge, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  3. Cai, M.C., et al.: ADReCS: an ontology database for aiding standardization and hierarchical classification of adverse drug reaction terms. Nucleic Acids Res. 43(D1), D907–D913 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Franco Rosa, F., Jino, M., Bonacin, R.: Towards an ontology of security assessment: a core model proposal. In: Latifi, S. (ed.) Information Technology - New Generations. AISC, vol. 738, pp. 75–80. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77028-4_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Franco Rosa, F., Jino, M., Bueno, P.M.S., Bonacin, R.: Coverage- based heuristics for selecting assessment items from security standards: a core set proposal. In: 2018 Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT, pp. 192–197. IEEE, April 2018Google Scholar
  6. Fenz, S., Ekelhart, A.: Formalizing information security knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Information, Computer, and Communications Security, pp. 183–194. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  7. Fraga, A.L., Vegetti, M.: Semi-automated ontology generation process from industrial product data standards. In: III Simposio Argentino de Ontologías y sus Aplicaciones (SAOA)-JAIIO 46 (Córdoba 2017) (2017)Google Scholar
  8. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Classical negation in logic programs and disjunctive databases. New Gen. Comput. 9, 365–385 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gonzalez-Perez, C., Henderson-Sellers, B., McBride, T., Low, G.C., Larrucea, X.: An ontology for ISO software engineering standards: 2) proof of concept and application. Comput. Standards Interfaces 48, 112–123 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harris, S., Seaborne, A., Prud’hommeaux, E.: SPARQL 1.1 query language. W3C Recommendation 21(10), 778 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. Huang, Y., Li, G.: A semantic analysis for internet of things. In: 2010 International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation (ICICTA), vol. 1, pp. 336–339. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  12. Marek, V.W., Truszczynski, M.: Stable models and an alternative logic programming. In: Apt, K.R., Marek, V.W., Truszczynski, M., Warren, D.S. (eds.) The Logic Programming Paradigm: a 25-Year Perspective, pp. 375–398. Springer, Heidelberg (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60085-2_17CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Ramanauskaitė, S., Olifer, D., Goranin, N., Čenys, A.: Security ontology for adaptive mapping of security standards. Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control (IJCCC) 8(6), 813–825 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Saint Joseph’s UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Intel CorporationAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations