Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Linking Real Geographies and Virtual Realties with Immersive Geospatial Technologies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geospatial Challenges in the 21st Century

Part of the book series: Key Challenges in Geography ((KCHGE))

  • 958 Accesses

Abstract

Due to the quantity of information available in the early twenty-first century, big data has become a frequently emphasized factor, and particularly so in the geographical research agenda. However, more data and information do not necessarily result in improved awareness of spatial problems: Communication of geographical knowledge (e.g., on environmental issues) is also complicated by geographical, temporal, and psychological distance between cause and effects, leading users to perceive spatial problems as taking place “later” or “elsewhere”. In this text, we discuss how immersive virtual reality (VR) technologies can help to overcome these different kinds of distances. Two broad topics are addressed: The first, covered in Sect. 4.2, explores the idea of immersion from a technological perspective and also discusses the main differences between immersive and current desktop-based geovisualization VR systems. The second, presented in Sect. 4.3, concerns the potential of immersive VR from the perspective of the user and introduces the concept of spatial presence. Against the theoretical background of Sects. 4.2 and 4.3, a working method defining how geospatial data can be visualized in immersive VR systems under current technological conditions is presented in Sect. 4.4. We argue that current geographic information systems (GIS) are not yet directly compatible with VR output devices, challenging both theoretical and practical models of GIS-based spatial data. The method proposed is set into practice in Sect. 4.5 using the example of a coral reef ecosystem. As is clear from these theoretical and practical considerations, immersive VR technologies can provide powerful tools to facilitate a better understanding of spatial problems in the twenty-first century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://21stcenturychallenges.org/.

  2. 2.

    http://www.biodiversidad.gob.mx/geoviz.

References

  • Ahn SJG et al (2016) Experiencing nature: embodying animals in immersive virtual environments increases inclusion of nature in self and involvement with nature. J Comput-Mediated Commun 21(6):399–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey JO, Bailenson JN, Casasanto D (2016) When does virtual embodiment change our minds? Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ 25(3):222–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker TR et al (2015) A research agenda for geospatial technologies and learning. J Geogr 114(3):118–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulos M, Lu Z, Guerrero P, Jennett C, Steed A (2017) From urban planning and emergency training to Pokémon Go: applications of virtual reality GIS (VRGIS) and augmented reality GIS (ARGIS) in personal, public and environmental health. Int J Health Geographics 16(1):7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brey P (2014) The physical and social reality of virtual worlds. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 42–54

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings JJ, Bailenson JN (2016) How immersive is enough? A meta-analysis of the effect of immersive technology on user presence. Media Psychol 19(2):272–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehn J, Webley PW, Worden AK (2016) Virtual Globes, where we were, are and will be. In: AGU fall meeting abstracts

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilworth J (2010) Realistic virtual reality and perception. Philos Psychol 23(1):23–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donert K et al (2016) The GI-learner approach: learning lines for geospatial thinking in secondary schools. GI Forum_2016. J Geogr Inf Sci 2:134–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan Q, Gong J, Li W, Shen S, Li R (2015) Improved Cubemap model for 3D navigation in geo-virtual reality. Int J Digit Earth 8(11):877–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freina L, Canessa A (2015) Immersive vs desktop virtual reality in game based learning. In: European conference on games based learning, Academic Conferences International Limited

    Google Scholar 

  • Garau M et al (2008) Temporal and spatial variations in presence: qualitative analysis of interviews from an experiment on breaks in presence. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ 17(3):293–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goradia I, Doshi J, Kurup L (2014) A review paper on oculus rift & project morpheus. Int J Curr Eng Technol 4(5):3196–3200

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann T et al (2015) The spatial presence experience scale (SPES). J Media Psychol

    Google Scholar 

  • IJsselsteijn WA, de Ridder H, Freeman J, Avons SE (2000) Presence: concept, determinants, and measurement. In: Human vision and electronic imaging V. International Society for Optics and Photonics

    Google Scholar 

  • Laarni J, Ravaja N, Saari T, Böcking S, Hartmann T, Schramm H (2015) Ways to measure spatial presence: review and future directions. In: Lombard M et al (eds) Immersed in media. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiserowitz AA (2005) American risk perceptions: is climate change dangerous? Risk Anal 25(6):1433–1442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao H, Dong W, Peng C, Liu H (2017) Exploring differences of visual attention in pedestrian navigation when using 2D maps and 3D geo-browsers. Cartography Geogr Inf Sci 44(6):474–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman N, Trope Y, Stephan E (2007) Psychological distance. In: Kruglanski AW, Higgins ET (eds) Social psychology: handbook of basic principles, 2nd edn. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin H et al (2013) Virtual geographic environments (VGEs): a new generation of geographic analysis tool. Earth Sci Rev 126:74–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lv Z, Li X (2015) Virtual reality assistant technology for learning primary geography. In: Gong Z, Chiu D, Zou D (eds) Current developments in web based learning. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Lv Z et al (2016) Managing big city information based on WebVRGIS. IEEE Access 4:407–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2006) Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in K-12 education. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otero JÁ, y Torres MLDL (2017) Spatial data infrastructures and geography learning. Eur J Geogr 8(3):19–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedl A (2007) Digital globes. In: Cartwright W, Peterson MP, Gartner G (eds) Multimedia cartography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Martínez RE et al (2014) Assessment of Acropora palmata in the Mesoamerican reef system. PLoS ONE 9(4):e96140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roeser S (2012) Risk communication, public engagement, and climate change: a role for emotions. Risk Anal 32(6):1033–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schonberger JL, Frahm JM (2016) Structure-from-motion revisited. In: IEEE Computer Society (eds) Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, IEEE, Piscataway, pp 4104–4113

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert T, Crusius J (2002) Five theses on the book problem: presence in books, film and VR. In: PRESENCE 2002-proceedings of the fifth international workshop on presence. Universidad Fernando Pessoa, Porto

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze JP et al (2011) Advanced applications of virtual reality. Adv Comput 82:217–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seibert J, Shafer DM (2018) Control mapping in virtual reality: effects on spatial presence and controller naturalness. Virtual Reality 22(1):79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarbez R, Brooks FP Jr, Whitton MC (2017) A survey of presence and related concepts. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 50(6), 96:1-96:39

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater M (2009) Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci 364(1535):3549–3557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater M, Wilbur S (1997) A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ 6(6):603–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P (2007) Numbed by numbers. Foreign Policy. In Digital form: http://foreignpolicy.com/2007/03/13/numbed-by-numbers/

  • Spence A, Poortinga W, Pidgeon N (2012) The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Anal 32(6):957–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler WR (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ Geogr 46(sup1):234–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trope Y, Liberman N (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychol Rev 117(2):440–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsou MH, Yanow K (2010) Enhancing general education with geographic information science and spatial literacy. J Urban Reg Inf Syst Assoc 22(2):45–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth W, Hartmann T, Böcking S, Vorderer P, Klimmt C, Schramm H, Saari T, Laarni J, Ravaja N, Gouveia FR, Biocca F (2007) A process model of the formation of spatial presence experiences. Media psychol 9(3):493–525, May 15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C et al (2016) What’s going on about geo-process modeling in virtual geographic environments (VGEs). Ecol Model 319:147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Vienna, Department of Geography and Regional Research, Vienna, Austria

    Florian Hruby

  2. National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity, Mexico City, Mexico

    Florian Hruby, Rainer Ressl & Genghis de la Borbolla del Valle

Authors
  1. Florian Hruby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rainer Ressl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Genghis de la Borbolla del Valle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Hruby .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. National Technical University of Athens, Pikermi, Greece

    Kostis Koutsopoulos

  2. University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

    Rafael de Miguel González

  3. EUROGEO, Liverpool, UK

    Karl Donert

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hruby, F., Ressl, R., de la Borbolla del Valle, G. (2019). Linking Real Geographies and Virtual Realties with Immersive Geospatial Technologies. In: Koutsopoulos, K., de Miguel González, R., Donert, K. (eds) Geospatial Challenges in the 21st Century. Key Challenges in Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04750-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation