Abstract
In this paper, we conceptually explore how value co-creation in peer-to-peer lodging services is constrained by a fundamental tension between a provider’s personalization and psychological ownership of a shared accommodation and customers’ psychological ownership of it. Our conceptual framework contributes to theory development about the unique nature of service in the sharing economy. Drawing on literature about service-dominant logic, service interactions, the theory of extended self, the experience economy, psychological ownership, and strategic management, we contend that there is a zone of optimal distinctiveness wherein both a provider’s and a customer’s psychological ownership of shared accommodation, as well as the provider’s personalization of this asset, are optimized. It is beneficial for providers of peer-to-peer lodging services to stay within this zone of optimal distinctiveness when personalizing their leveraged assets in the sharing economy. Optimizing the psychological ownership of shared accommodation is desirable because it helps to satisfy the basic human needs of both a customer and a provider involved in a peer-to-peer lodging service, thereby increasing value co-creation in their service relationship. Also, a customer with high psychological ownership of shared accommodation will take better care of this asset, thereby reducing a provider’s risk for property damage.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Belk R. You are what you can access: sharing and collaborative consumption online. J Bus Res. 2014;67(8):1595–600.
Bardhi F, Eckhardt GM, Arnould EJ. Liquid relationship to possessions. J Consumer Res. 2012;39(3):510–29.
Mody MA, Suess C, Lehto X. The accommodation experiencescape: a comparative assessment of hotels and Airbnb. Int J Contemp Hospital Manage. 2017;29(9):2377–404.
Maglio PP, Spohrer J. Fundamentals of service science. J Acad Market Sci. 2008;36:18–20.
Moeller S, Wittkowski K. The burdens of ownership: reasons for preferring renting. Manag Serv Qual. 2010;20(2):176–91.
Bhappu AD, Schultze U. The role of relational and operational performance in B2B customers’ adoption of self-service technology. J Serv Res. 2006;8(4):372–85.
Gutek BA, Welsh TM. A brave new service strategy: aligning customer relationships, market strategies, and business structures. Amacom;2000.
Proserpio D, Xu W, Zervas G. You get what you give: theory and evidence of reciprocity in the sharing economy. In: Quantitative marketing and economics conference;2016. pp. 1–46.
Vargo SL, Lusch RF. Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J Market. 2004;68:1–17.
Cabiddu F, Lui TW, Piccoli G. Managing value co-creation in the tourism industry. Annal Tour Res. 2013;42:86–107.
Vargo S, Maglio PP, Archpru A. On value and value co-creation: a service systems and service logic perspective. Eur Manag J. 2008;26(3):145–52.
Payne AF, Storbacka K, Frow P. Managing the co-creation of value. J Acad Mark Sci. 2008;36(1):83–96.
Maglio PP, Spohrer J. A service science perspective on business model innovation. Ind Mark Manage. 2013;42:665–70.
Gilmore JH, Pine BJ II. Differentiating hospitality operations via experiences: why selling services is not enough. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly. 2002;43(3):87–96.
Pierce JL, Kostova T, Dirks K. Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Acad Manag Rev. 2001;26(2):298–310.
Pierce JL, Kostova T, Dirks KT. The state of psychological ownership: integrating and extending a century of research. Rev General Psychol. 2003;7(1):84–107.
Rudmin FW, Berry JW. Semantics of ownership: a free-recall study of property. Psychol Record. 1987;37:257–68.
Belk RW. Possessions and the extended self. J Consumer Res. 1988;15(2):139–68.
Wattanasuwan K. The self and symbolic consumption. J Amer Acad Bus. 2005;6(1):179–18.
Jussila I, Tarkiainen A, Sarstedt M, Hair JF. Individual psychological ownership: concepts, evidence, and implications for research in marketing. J Market Theory Pract. 2015;23(2):121–39.
Jiménez FR, Voss K, Frankwick GL. A classification schema of co-production of goods: an open-systems perspective. Eur J Mark. 2013;47(11):1841–58.
Snihur Y. Developing optimal distinctiveness: organizational identity processes in new ventures engaged in business model innovation. Entrepreneur Reg Develop. 2016;28(3–4):259–85.
Zhao EY, Fisher G, Lounsbury M, Miller D. Optimal distinctiveness: broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management. Strateg Manag J. 2017;38:93–113.
Davis JH, Schoorman FD, Donaldson L. Toward a stewardship theory of management. Acad Manag Rev. 1997;22:20–47.
Elfenbein DW, Zenger T. Creating and capturing value in repeated exchange relationships: the second paradox of embeddedness. Organ Sci. 2017;28(5):894–914.
Ert E, Fleischer A, Magen N. Trust and reputation in the sharing economy: the role of personal photos in Airbnb. Tour Manag. 2016;55:62–73.
Hum NJ, Chamberlin PE, Hambright BL, Portwood AC, Schat AC, Bevan JL. A picture is worth a thousand words: a content analysis of Facebook profile photographs. Comput Hum Behav. 2011;27(5):1828–33.
Yang Z, Fang X. Online service quality dimensions and their relationships with satisfaction: a content analysis of customer reviews of securities brokerage services. Int J Serv Ind Manag. 2004;15(3):302–26.
Gbrich C. Qualitative data analysis: an introduction. 1st ed. London: Sage Publications; 2007.
Kolbe RH, Burnett MS. Content-analysis research: an examination of applications with directives for improving research reliability and objectivity. J Consumer Res. 1991;18(2):243–50.
Acknowledgements
We thank anonymous reviewers and session participants at the 2018 Macromarketing Conference for their constructive feedback on an earlier version of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bhappu, A.D., Helm, S. (2019). Zone of Optimal Distinctiveness: Provider Asset Personalization and the Psychological Ownership of Shared Accommodation. In: Yang, H., Qiu, R. (eds) Advances in Service Science. INFORMS-CSS 2018. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04726-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04726-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04725-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04726-9
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)