Corporate Hegemony and the Mutual Support Network

  • Joel Magnuson
Part of the Palgrave Insights into Apocalypse Economics book series (PIAE)


When the banking crisis of 2007–2009 began exploding around the world, an amazing spectacle unfolded in Washington. A group of executives from gigantic corporations in the financial sector descended on the nation’s capital and presented the government with an ultimatum. The government was to either release billions in bailout money or face the consequences of sending the nation’s economy into a cataclysm and sacking millions of jobs.


  1. Beckert, Jens. “Institutional Isomorphism Revisited: Convergence and Divergence in Institutional Change,” Sociological Theory, Vol. 28, No. 2, June 2010, pp. 150–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bivens, Josh, and Hunter Blair. “The Likely Economic Effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act,” Economic Policy Institute, February 25, 2018.
  3. Bivens, Josh, and Lawrence Mishel. “Understanding the Historic Divergence Between Productivity and Typical Workers’ Pay: Why It Matters and Why It’s Real,” Economic Policy Institute, September 2, 2015.Google Scholar
  4. Blair, Hunter. “The Arguments Supporting Corporate Tax Cuts Are Wrong, and Territorial Taxation Will Make Things Worse,” Economic Policy Institute, December 15, 2017.
  5. Booth, Danielle. Fed Up: An Insider’s Take On Why the Federal Reserve Is Bad for America (New York, NY: Penguin, 2017).Google Scholar
  6. Bureau of Economic Analysis. “National Income and Product Accounts Report,” Third Quarter, 2017.
  7. Bureau of Labor Statistics. “Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey,” 2018.
  8. Derby, Michael S. “Fed’s Dudley: ‘Deep Seated’ Cultural, Ethical Lapses at Many Financial Firms,” Wall Street Journal, November 7, 2013.Google Scholar
  9. Desai, Padma. From Financial Crisis to Global Recovery (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
  10. DiMaggio, Paul, and Walter Powell. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, 1983, pp. 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Driesen, David. “Testimony Before House of Representatives,” July 6, 2016.
  12. Dugger, William M. Corporate Hegemony (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1989), p. xiii.Google Scholar
  13. Eder, Steve. “Neomi Rao, the Scholar Who Will Help Lead Trump’s Regulatory Overhaul,” New York Times, July 9, 2017.Google Scholar
  14. Egan, Matt. “Tax Cut Scoreboard: Workers $6 Billions; Shareholders $171 Billion,” CNN Money, February 16, 2018.Google Scholar
  15. Federal Elections Commission.
  16. Gilson, David. “Hope and Spare Change: Obama vs. McCain in Campaign Cash,” Mother Jones, 2010.Google Scholar
  17. Green, Erica L., and Stephanie Saul. “What Charles Koch and Other Donors to George Mason University Got for Their Money,” The New York Times, May 5, 2018.Google Scholar
  18. Gruchy, Allan. Contemporary Economic Thought: The Contribution of Neo-Institutional Economics (Clifton, NJ: Augustus M. Kelley, 1972).Google Scholar
  19. House of Representatives’ Ways and Means Committee Press Release. “Legislation to Overhaul America’s Tax Code for First Time in 31 Years Will Deliver More Jobs, Fairer Taxes, Bigger Paychecks,” November 2, 2017.Google Scholar
  20. Joint Committee on Taxation Report, November, 2017.
  21. Jones, Clifford. “Buckley v Valeo Law Case,” Encyclopedia Britannica.
  22. Lewis, John P., and Robert C. Turner. Business Conditions Analysis (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2nd ed., 1967).Google Scholar
  23. Liptak, Adam. “Justices, 5-4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit,” The New York Times, January 21, 2010.Google Scholar
  24. Long, Heather. “Why Aren’t the Other Hands Up?’ A Top Trump Adviser’s Startling Response to CEOs not Doing What We’d Expect,” Washington Post, November 17, 2017.Google Scholar
  25. Offe, Claus. “Designing Institutions in East European Transitions,” in R.E. Goodin (ed.), The Theory of Institutional Design (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  26. Otani, Akane, Ben Eisen, and Chelsey Dulaney. “Capital Spending Boom Is No Great Boost to Capital Markets,” Wall Street Journal, May 15, 2018.Google Scholar
  27. Philipsen, Dirk. The Little Big Number: How GDP Came to Rule the World and What to Do About It (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
  28. Rizzo, Salvador. “Fact-Checking Republican Attack Ads in Tight House Races,” The Washington Post, August 31, 2018.Google Scholar
  29. Stiglitz, Joseph. “Nationalized Banks Are ‘Only Answer,’ Economist Stiglitz Says,” Deutsche Welle, February 6, 2009, posted on,4005355,00.html.
  30. Tankersley, Jim. “Republicans Sought to Undercut an Unfavorable Analysis of the Tax Plan,” The New York Times, December 4, 2017.Google Scholar
  31. Tankersley, Jim. “How the Trump Tax Cut Is Helping to Push the Federal Deficit to $1 Trillion,” The New York Times, July 25, 2018.Google Scholar
  32. Tankersley, Jim, and Michael Tackett. “Trump Tax Cut Pay Dividends for the GOP,” The New York Times, August 19, 2018.Google Scholar
  33. Totenberg, Nina, “Supreme Hears Campaign Finance Case,” NPR Morning Edition, September 10, 2009.Google Scholar
  34. U.S. Treasury Press Release.
  35. Veblen, Thorstein. “The Higher Learning,” in The Portable Veblen (New York, NY: Viking Press, 1948), p. 511.Google Scholar
  36. Wessel, David. In Fed We Trust: Ben Bernanke’s War on the Great Panic (New York, NY: Crown Business, 2009).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joel Magnuson
    • 1
  1. 1.Independent ResearcherTualatinUSA

Personalised recommendations