Skip to main content

The Manufacturing Sector in Argentina at the Beginning of the Twenty-First Century

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Manufacturing Sector in Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico

Abstract

During its model of industrialization by import substitution, Argentina achieved not only the deepest and most articulated industrial framework of the Latin American region, but also the most organized and combative working class. The military dictatorship that seized power in March 1976 aimed to interrupt the process of industrialization, and to eradicate the bases that made it sustainable, and the attack was particularly severe on the organizational capability of the working class. Not only did the return to democracy at the beginning of the 1980s fail to reverse the development model based on financial valorization, but this economic model was deepened during the following democratic administrations that ended up with the economic and social crisis of 2001. The arrival of Néstor Kirchner in May 2003 and the two successive presidencies of Cristina Fernández de Kirchner after this administration marked a turning point again. By rejecting the main ideas of the Washington Consensus and using a set of economic policies aimed at restoring real wages, favoring domestic consumption and investment with successful policies of de-indebtedness, the country had enormous growth in the industrial sector that, for the first time since the industrialization by import substitution stage, grew at average annual rates higher than the aggregate of the economy. The objectives of this chapter are, first, to examine the productive transformations that the Argentine manufacturing sector has experienced from the late 1990s to the present; second, to give an account of the capacity of the industrial sector to generate employment and the evolution of real wages of industrial workers; third, to examine the degree of relation that the sector has with foreign markets as well as the degree of external dependence of its productive structure; and finally, to study the impact that industrial policies had on the performance of the sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    On the night of December 21, 2001, Fernando De La Rua resigned and was succeeded by Ramón Puerta, who resigned on December 23, 2001. Puerta was replaced by Rodriguez Saa, who resigned on December 30, 2001, and was succeeded by Eduardo Camaño, who remained in office only two days. On January 1, 2002, Eduardo Duhalde was named president.

  2. 2.

    The debts denominated in dollars were pesified 1 to 1, while the deposits denominated in dollars were pesified at a rate of 1.40 pesos per dollar (both being updated for inflation by means of the reference stabilization coefficient [CER]), and the state payed and covered the difference.

  3. 3.

    It is important to clarify, as will be seen below, that the increase in imports of goods was also added in particular by energy imports, capital flight, the remittance of profits, and the drainage of dollars associated with tourism.

  4. 4.

    The RUFO (Rights Upon Future Offers) is a clause used in certain contracts, in which a party who has agreed to contractual terms gains certain rights if other parties in the future obtain better terms.

  5. 5.

    PAMI is a health plan for retirees and pensioners, people over 70 years without retirement, and ex-combatants of Malvinas that operates in Argentina under federal state control.

  6. 6.

    The official estimations for 2018 done in August by the government project inflation of the year to be around 45%.

  7. 7.

    The information of the 500 largest firms is provided by the Encuesta Nacional a Grandes Empresas (ENGE) realized by the Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos (INDEC) which provides an integrated set of information regarding the gross value of production, VA, gross fixed capital formation, occupation, wages, and transactions with foreign countries, among other relevant variables. The selection of the 500 largest companies in the country is based on the gross value of its production, which in turn delimits its size.

  8. 8.

    For more details see Shaikh (2016) and Santarcángelo (2011).

References

  • Amsden, A. (2001). The rise of the rest, challenges to the west from late-industrializing economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azpiazu, D., & Schorr, M. (2010). Hecho en Argentina. Industria y economía, 1976–2007. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baruj, G., & Porta, F. (2006). Políticas de competitividad en la Argentina y su impacto sobre la profundización del Mercosur, Documento de proyecto N° 93, CEPAL, Naciones Unidas, Santiago de Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basualdo, E. (2006). Estudios de historia económica argentina. Desde mediados del siglo xx a la actualidad. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berretoni, D., & Polonsky, M. (2011). Evolución del comercio exterior argentino en la última década: origen, destino y composición, Revista del CEI, número 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, P., & Labory, S. (2006). International handbook on industrial policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Capdeville, M. (2005). Globalización, especialización y heterogeneidad estructural en México. In M. Cimoli (Ed.), Heterogeneidad Estructural, Asimetrías Tecnológicas y Crecimiento en América Latina. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL/BID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. J. (2002). Kicking away the ladder: Development strategy in historical perspective. London: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H., & Andreoni, A. (2016). Industrial policy in a changing world: Basic principles, neglected issues and new challenges, in the Cambridge journal of economics 40 years conference. London: University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIFRA. (2009). Concentración, centralización y Extranjerización. Continuidades y cambios en la Post-convertibilidad, Informe de avance. CIFRA-CTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cimoli, M., Dosi, G., & Stiglitz, J. E. (Eds.). (2009). Industrial policy and development. The political economy of capabilities accumulation. The Initiative for Policy Dialogue Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coatz, D., Grasso, F., & Kosacoff, B. (2015). Desarrollo industrial: recuperación, freno y desafíos para el desarrollo en el siglo XX. Buenos Aires: Consejo Profesional de Ciencias Económicas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Maio, M. (2009). Industrial policies in developing countries: History and perspectives. In M. Cimoli, G. Dosi, & J. E. Stiglitz (Eds.), Industrial policy and development. The political economy of capabilities accumulation. The initiative for policy dialogue series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos, T. (2003). La teoría de la dependencia. Balance y Perspectivas. Mexico: Plaza Janes.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECLAC. (2012, August). Structural change for equality: An integrated approach to development. Santiagode Chile: ECLAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández Bugna, C., & Porta, F. (2008). El crecimiento reciente de la industria argentina. Nuevo régimen sin cambio estructural, Realidad Económica, 233, Buenos Aires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández Bugna, C., & Porta, F. (2011). La industria manufacturera: trayectoria reciente y cambios estructurales. In R. Mercado, B. Kosacoff, & F. Porta (Eds.), La Argentina del largo plazo: Crecimiento, fluctuaciones y cambio estructural. Buenos Aires: PNUD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, R., Hwang, J., & Rodrik, D. (2005, December). What you export matters. Center for International Development, Working Paper No. 123. Boston: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos – INDEC. (2018). Encuesta Nacional a Grandes Empresas, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J., & Stumpo, G. (2001). Regímenes competitivos sectoriales, productividad y competitividad internacional. Serie Desarrollo Productivo N° 103, Santiago de Chile, CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulfas, M. (2016). Los tres kirchnerismos. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, D. S. (1970). The unbound prometheus: Technological change and industrial development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavarello, P., & Sarabia, M. (2015, December). La política industrial en la Argentina en la década de los 2000, Serie Estudios y Perspectivas de la CEPAL, Buenos Aires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., Rocha Loures, de F. E., & Pierin Ramos, L. (2017). Past, present and future of industry 4.0 – A systematic literature review and research agenda proposal, International Journal of Production Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucero, J. (2018). El patrón de especialización comercial de la cúpula empresarial en Argentina (1994–2015), Tesis de maestria, FLACSO, Argentina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzanelli, P., Barrera, M., Belloni, P., & Basualdo, E. (2014). Devaluación y restricción externa. Los dilemas de la coyuntura económica actual, Cuadernos de Economía Crítica, Año 1, n. 1, octubre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología. (2012). Argentina Innovadora 2020. Plan nacional de ciencia, tecnología e innovación: Lineamientos estratégicos 2012–2015, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Brid, J. C. (2013). Industrial policy: A missing link in Mexico’s quest for export-led growth. Latin American Policy, 4(2), 216–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrone, G., & Santarcángelo, J. (2018). Restricción externa y la sustitución de importaciones en Argentina: Análisis de la historia reciente, Ensayos de Economía, Medellin, Colombia.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porta, F., Santarcángelo, J., & Schteingart, D. (2014). Excedente y desarrollo industrial en Argentina: situación y desafíos, Documento de Trabajo n. 59, CEFIDAR, Julio de 2014, pp. 1–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porta, F., Santarcángelo, J., & Schteingart, D. (2017). Un proyecto político con objetivos económicos: Los límites de la estrategia kirchnerista. In A. Pucciarelli & A. Castellani (Eds.), Los años del kirchnerismo: la disputa hegemónica tras la crisis del orden neoliberal. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santarcángelo, J. (2011). Growth, employment and income distribution. A long run analysis for the case of Argentina, Lambert, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santarcángelo, J. (2013). Crecimiento industrial, sector externo y sustitución de importaciones, in Realidad Económica n. 279, IADE, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santarcángelo, J., & Perrone, G. (2012). Transformaciones, rentabilidad y empleoen la cúpula industrial. Análisis de la cúpula automotriz en la post-Convertibilidad, H-industri@, Año 6- Nro. 10, primer semestre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santarcángelo, J., Justo, O., & Cooney, P. (2016). Latin America after the financial crisis economic ramifications from heterodox perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santarcángelo, J., Schteingart, D., & Porta, F. (2017). Recent industrial policy in Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Mexico: A comparative approach. Revue Interventions économiques/Papers in Political Economy, 59, 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schorr, M., Castellani, A., Duarte, M., & DebrottSanchez, D. (2005). Más allá del pensamiento único. Hacia una renovación de las ideas económicas en América Latina y el Caribe. Argentina: CLACSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schteingart, D. (2016). La restricción externa en el largo plazo: Argentina, 1960–2013, Centro de Economía Internacional, Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaikh, A. (2016). Capitalism: Competition, conflict, crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sirlin, P. (1999). Argentina’s Industrial Specialization Regime: new-generation industrial policy, or merely a transfer of resources? CEPAL Review, 68, 101–114.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Santarcángelo, J.E. (2019). The Manufacturing Sector in Argentina at the Beginning of the Twenty-First Century. In: Santarcángelo, J. (eds) The Manufacturing Sector in Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico. Palgrave Studies in Latin American Heterodox Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04705-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04705-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04704-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04705-4

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics