Skip to main content

Shoulder Dysfunction and Disability Secondary to Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Surgical treatment of head and neck cancers may often be performed with a need for various degrees of neck dissection (ND). The extent of ND may vary from relatively local approaches to those that are more extensive. Additionally, ND may be done either unilaterally or bilaterally dependent upon the site and extension of the primary tumor. While ND is performed in order to achieve oncological safety, one of the more commonly reported postsurgical deficits is that related to changes in shoulder mobility. Further, decreases in the range of shoulder movement may often be associated with pain with subsequent limitations in functioning with secondary influence on quality of life. Collectively, restrictions in shoulder function may result in considerable levels of disability that limit the individual’s capacity to undertake a variety of tasks. While such changes may directly influence day-to-day physical activities and potentially vocational and avocational demands, shoulder deficits and the secondary disability can also create challenges for individuals who use the artificial electrolarynx or those who select tracheoesophageal puncture voice restoration as a postlaryngectomy alaryngeal communication option. This chapter addresses the structure and function of the shoulder complex, shoulder disability secondary to head and neck cancer treatment, and its potential consequences on a broad range of physical activities, providing information on its potential influence on postlaryngectomy voice and speech rehabilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Tom Lennox, Luminaud Inc., Mentor, OH, personal communication.

  2. 2.

    Because the postlaryngectomy neck wound is fresh with sutures/staples and may have included some type of flap reconstruction, in additional to potential swelling of the neck postsurgery and lymphedema, pain or tenderness, etc., neck-type EL devices are seldom introduced to individuals until sufficient healing has occurred. Hence, intraoral EL devices are the preferred option of choice early in the rehabilitation process.

  3. 3.

    One of the simplest approaches to understanding the demands associated with the acquisition of speech with either a neck-type or intraoral EL is for the clinician to learn the behavior themselves. When one who is likely to have normal shoulder mobility, no pain, and adequate fine motor skills for positioning a device and activating it requires substantial practice, the impact of shoulder deficits is often very well understood.

  4. 4.

    It is also important to point out that in some instances, the use of the non-dominant hand may be required, and consequently, additional challenges to achieving desired positioning of the arm and hand may be observed.

References

  • Ahlberg, A., Nikolaidis, P., Engström, T., Gunnarsson, K., Johansson, H., Sharp, L., & Laurell, G. (2012). Morbidity of supraomohyoidal and modified radical neck dissection combined with radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. A prospective longitudinal study. Head & Neck, 34(1), 66–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biel, A. (2010). Trail guide to the body (4th ed.). Boulder, CO: Books of Discovery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, P. J., Ferlito, A., Silver, C. E., Takes, R. P., Woolgar, J. A., Strojan, P., … Rinaldo, A. (2011). Neck treatment and shoulder morbidity: Still a challenge. Head & Neck, 33(7), 1060–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Codman, E. A. (1934). The shoulder. Boston, MA: Thomas Todd Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culham, E., & Peat, M. (1993). Functional anatomy of the shoulder complex. The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 18(1), 342–350.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deidrich, W., & Youngstrom, K. (1966). Alaryngeal speech. Springfield, IL: Thompson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, P. C. (1994). Foundations of voice and speech rehabilitation following laryngeal cancer. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, P. C. (2005). Clinical procedures for training use of the electronic artificial larynx. In P. C. Doyle & R. L. Keith (Eds.), Rehabilitation following treatment for head and neck cancer: Voice, speech, and swallowing. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Ghani, F., Van Den Brekel, M. W. M., De Goede, C. J. T., Kuik, J., Leemans, C. R., & Smeele, L. E. (2002). Shoulder function and patient well-being after various types of neck dissections. Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences, 27(5), 403–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garzaro, M., Riva, G., Raimondo, L., Aghemo, L., Giordano, C., & Pecorari, G. (2015). A study of neck and shoulder morbidity following neck dissection: The benefits of cervical plexus preservation. Ear, Nose, & Throat Journal, 94(8), 330–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, H. H., & Dickey, J. R. (1965). LXXIII nerve grafting to restore function of the trapezius muscle after radical neck dissection: A preliminary report. The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 74(3), 880–886.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hislop, H. J., & Montgomery, J. (2002). Muscle testing: Techniques of manual examination (7th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huegel, J., Williams, A. A., & Soslowsky, L. J. (2015). Rotator cuff biology and biomechanics: A review of normal and pathological conditions. Current Rheumatology Reports, 17, 476–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, M. J., Kane, T. E., & Leggin, B. G. (2008). Spinal accessory nerve palsy: Associated signs and symptoms. The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 38(2), 78–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, F. P., McCreary, E. K., Provance, P. G., Rodgers, M. M., & Romani, W. A. (2005). Muscles testing and function with posture and pain (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisner, C., & Colby, L. A. (2012). Therapeutic exercise. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuntz, A. I., & Weymuller, E. A. (1999). Impact of neck dissection on quality of life. Laryngoscope, 109(8), 1334–1338.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laverick, S., Lowe, D., Brown, J. S., Vaughan, E. D., & Rogers, S. N. (2004). The impact of neck dissection on healthrelated quality of life. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 130(2), 149–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leipzig, B., Suen, J. Y., English, J. L., Barnes, J., & Hooper, M. (1983). Functional evaluation of the spinal accessory nerve after neck dissection. American Journal of Surgery, 146(4), 526–530.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ludewig, P. M., & Reynolds, J. F. (2009). The association of scapular kinematics and glenohumeral joint pathologies. The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 39(2), 90–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magee, D. J. (2002). Orthopedic physical assessment (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marieb, E. N., Mallatt, J., & Wilhelm, P. B. (2005). Human Anatomy (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Pearson Benjamin Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure, P. W., Michener, L. A., Sennett, B. J., & Karduna, A. R. (2001). Direct 3-dimensional measurement of scapular kinematics during dynamic movements in vivo. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 10(3), 269–277.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGarvey, A. C., Hoffman, G. R., Osmotherly, P. G., & Chiarelli, P. E. (2015). Maximizing shoulder function after accessory nerve injury and neck dissection surgery: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Head & Neck, 37(7), 1022–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, M. L., Parliament, M., Courneya, K. S., Seikaly, H., Jha, N., Scrimger, R., & Hanson, J. (2004). A pilot study of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of progressive resistance exercise training on shoulder dysfunction caused by spinal accessory neurapraxia/neurectomy in head and neck cancer survivors. Head & Neck, 26(6), 518–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, M. L., Parliament, M. B., Seikaly, H., Jha, N., Magee, D. J., Haykowsky, M. J., & Courneya, K. S. (2008). Effect of exercise on upper extremity pain and dysfunction in head and neck cancer survivors. Cancer, 113(1), 214–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzner, G., Hillman, R. E., Heaton, J. T., Houston, K. M., Kobler, J. B., & Qi, Y. (2005). Electrolaryngeal speech: The state of the art and future directions for development. In P. C. Doyle & R. L. Keith (Eds.), Contemporary considerations in the treatment and rehabilitation of head and neck cancer: Voice, speech, and swallowing (pp. 571–590). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mottram, S. L. (1997). Dynamic stability of the scapula. Manual Therapy, 2(3), 123–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moukarbel, R. V., Fung, K., Franklin, J. H., Leung, A., Rastogi, R., Anderson, C. M., & Yoo, J. H. (2010). Neck and shoulder disability following reconstruction with the pectoralis major pedicled flap. Laryngoscope, 120(6), 1129–1134.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nahum, A. M., Mullally, W., & Marmor, L. (1961). A syndrome resulting from radical neck dissection. Archives of Otolaryngology, 74(4), 424–428.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nibu, K. I., Ebihara, Y., Ebihara, M., Kawabata, K., Onitsuka, T., Fujii, T., & Saikawa, M. (2010). Quality of life after neck dissection: A multicenter longitudinal study by the Japanese Clinical Study Group on Standardization of Treatment for Lymph Node Metastasis of Head and Neck Cancer. International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 15(1), 33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paine, R., & Voight, M. L. (2013). The role of the scapula. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 8(5), 617.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Poppen, N. K., & Walker, P. S. (1976). Normal and abnormal motion of the shoulder. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American), 58(2), 195–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schenkman, M., & Rugo De Cartaya, V. (1987). Kinesiology of the shoulder complex. The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 8(9), 438–450.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Short, S. O., Kaplan, J. N., Laramore, G. E., & Cummings, C. W. (1984). Shoulder pain and function after neck dissection with or without preservation of the spinal accessory nerve. American Journal of Surgery, 148(4), 478–482.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. I., & Blom, E. D. (1980). An endoscopic technique for restoration of voice after laryngectomy. The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 89, 529–533.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. C., Terrell, J. E., Ronis, D. L., Fowler, K. E., Bishop, C., Lambert, M. T., … Duffy, S. A. (2004). Disability in patients with head and neck cancer. Archives of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, 130(6), 764–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terrell, J. E., Welsh, D. E., Bradford, C. R., Chepeha, D. B., Esclamado, R. M., Hogikyan, N. D., & Wolf, G. T. (2000). Pain, quality of life, and spinal accessory nerve status after neck dissection. Laryngoscope, 110(4), 620–626.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Terry, G. C., & Chopp, T. M. (2000). Functional anatomy of the shoulder. Journal of Athletic Training, 35(3), 248–255.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wilgen, C. P., Dijkstra, P. U., Van der Laan, B. F. A. M., Plukker, J. T., & Roodenburg, J. L. N. (2004). Shoulder and neck morbidity in quality of life after surgery for head and neck cancer. Head & Neck, 26(10), 839–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veeger, H. E. J., & van der Helm, F. C. T. (2007). Shoulder function: The perfect compromise between mobility and stability. Journal of Biomechanics, 40, 2119–2129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weymuller, E. A., Yueh, B., Deleyiannis, F. W. B., Kuntz, A. L., Alsarraf, R., & Coltrera, M. D. (2000). Quality of life in head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope, 110(S94), 4–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Boulougouris, A., Doyle, P.C. (2019). Shoulder Dysfunction and Disability Secondary to Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer. In: Doyle, P. (eds) Clinical Care and Rehabilitation in Head and Neck Cancer. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04702-3_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04702-3_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04701-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04702-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics