Skip to main content

Beautiful and Safe Landscapes for Sustainable Disaster Risk Reduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disaster Research and the Second Environmental Crisis

Part of the book series: Environmental Hazards ((ENHA))

  • 634 Accesses

Abstract

Landscapes are not merely physical resources to be catalogued and managed but are “places with a story, which people take care of and with whom they develop a sense of belonging” (Williams and Patterson, Soc Nat Resour 9:507–521, 1996). Efforts to transform environments to reduce disaster risk, if not integrated with the stories and social and emotional conditions of the community at risk, may face opposition, apathy, or lack of political or financial support. At the same time, in this period of dramatic climate change and increasing disaster risks, efforts to produce only comfortable and beautiful landscapes may create potentially dangerous ones. Drawing on studies, land use planning projects, and risk reduction efforts in Norway, the US, the Netherlands, Italy, Hong Kong, and Chile, this essay argues that integrating environmental aesthetics principles, nature conservation, ecologically oriented landscape design, and disaster risk reduction can help communities create and maintain sustainable, safe, and ecologically healthy environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, D. E. (1984). Housing crisis after natural disaster: The aftermath of the November 1980 southern Italian earthquake. Geoforum, 15(4), 489–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attolico, A. (2014). Building resilience through territorial planning: The experience of province of Potenza. Procedia Economics and Finance, 18, 528–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, I., Kates, R. W., & White, G. F. (1978). The environment as hazard. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camuffo, M., & Soriani, S. (2015). Un ricordo: Gabriele Zanetto e gli studi ambientali a Venezia, Politica e gestione dell'ambiente; Attori, processi, esperienze. Pàtron Editore: Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, A. (1977). On the possibility of quantifying scenic beauty. Landscape Planning, 4, 131–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castiglioni, B., Parascandolo, F., & Tanca, M. (a cura di) (2015). Landscape as mediator. Landscape as commons. International perspectives on landscape research. Padova: CLEUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2000). European landscape convention. In Congress of the Council of Europe, Firenze.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Groot, M. (2012). Exploring the relationship between public environmental ethics and river flood policies in western Europe. Journal of Environmental Management, 93(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, D. R., & Motzkin, G. (1998). Ecology and conservation in the cultural landscape of New England: Lessons from nature’s history. Northeasten Naturalist, 5(2), 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambi, L. (1964). Questioni di geografia. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani, M. V. Theory of attachment and place attachment. M. Bonnes, T. Lee, M. Bonaiuto, Psychological theories for environmental issues, Aldershot: Ashgate 2003, 137–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudie, A. (2000). The human impact on the natural environment. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo, M. C., & Hernández, B. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 273–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islas, P. A. V., & Felsenhardt, R. S. C. (2015). El paisaje urbano de emergencia en Valdivia, Chile: contribuciones a la planificación y diseño urbano post-desastre para la restauración. Revista INVI, 30(83), 19–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. (1991). The psychology of personal constructs (Vol. 457, 2nd ed.). London: Routledge. isbn:0415037980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpela, K., & Hartig, T. (1996). Restorative qualities of favorite places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lague, R., & Smith, K. (2013). Village master plan for Wilmington, Vermont (25pp). Conway School of Landscape Design, Conway. Accessible online at: http://wilmingtonvermont.us/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Village-Plan-for-Town-of-Wilmington.pdf

  • Leopold, A. (1949). A sand county almanac, and sketches here and there; illustrated by Charles W. Schwartz. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, J. R., & Meir, G. (1998). Back to the future, back to basics: The social ecology of landscapes and the future of landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 42(2), 207–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, A. Y., & Jim, C. Y. (2010). Differential community effects on perception and use of urban greenspaces. Cities, 27(6), 430–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, A. Y., & Jim, C. Y. (2015). Community attachment and resident attitude toward old masonry walls and associated trees in urban Hong Kong. Cities, 42, 130–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lokocz, E., Ryan, L. R., & Sadler, A. J. (2011). Motivations for land protection and stewardship: Exploring place attachment and rural landscape character in Massachusetts. Landscape and Urban Planning, 99(2), 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer, J. I. (1997). Cultural sustainability: Aligning aesthetics and ecology. In J. Nassauer (Ed.), Placing nature: Culture and landscape ecology (pp. 65–83). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohl, W. (1997). Halbierter Naturschutz. Nature conservation only half the job! Nature und Landschaft, 4, 221–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, K. R. (2007). The practice of landscape ‘conventions’ and the just landscape: The case of the European landscape convention. Landscape Research, 32(5), 579–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharifi, A., & Murayama, A. (2013). Changes in the traditional urban form and the social sustainability of contemporary cities: A case study of Iranian cities. Habitat International, 38, 126–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (1996). Thirdspace, Expanding the geographical imagination. York: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W., Frixa, E., Di Blasi, A., & Farinelli, F. (2007). Dopo la metropoli: Per una critica della geografia Urbana e regionale. Bologna: Pàtron Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinacci Mossello, M. (2008). Politica dell’ambiente – Analisi, azioni, progetti. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troll, C. (1939). Luftbildplan and okologische bodenforschung (pp. 241–298). Berlin: Zeitschraft der Gesellschaft fur Erdkunde Zu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. J., & Ryan, R. L. (2008). Place attachment and landscape preservation in rural New England: A maine case study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86(2), 141–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. R., & Patterson, M. E. (1996). Environmental meaning and ecosystem management: Perspectives from environmental psychology and human geography. Society & Natural Resources, 9(5), 507–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuen, B. (2005). Searching for place identity in Singapore. Habitat International, 29(2005), 197–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanetto, G., Vallerani, F., & Soriani, S. (1996). Nature, environment, landscape: European attitudes and discourses in the modern period the Italian case, 1920–1970. Padova: Univ. di Padova.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Marincioni, F., Casareale, C., Byrne, K. (2019). Beautiful and Safe Landscapes for Sustainable Disaster Risk Reduction. In: Kendra, J., Knowles, S., Wachtendorf, T. (eds) Disaster Research and the Second Environmental Crisis. Environmental Hazards. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04691-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics