Abstract
The purpose of this research is to understand what might be today—on the edge of the social robotics era—the role of robots in public spaces. In Europe, there was a strong tradition of automata exhibition in the ‘600 and 700’ with ostensive purpose. Exposing automata in various fairs was meant to inspire awe towards the advancement of technology and science in the public who attended numerous public events. This study aims to investigate whether in the modern world the robot may have the same or other functions in public space. The study has analyzed the public display of the robot DORO: a technological artifact created by the Sant’Anna School during the European project ROBOT-ERA. Two distinct public moments were examined. The first was the night of researchers in Pisa on 30 September 2016 in Martiri della Libertà’s square, where DORO was exhibited to the public. The second occasion was the inauguration of the 39th academic year of the University of Udine. On this occasion, DORO brought to the rector his inaugural lecture and exchanged—in front of a large auditorium—a brief dialogue with the rector of the University of Udine, prof. Alberto de Toni.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
de Graaf, M. M. A., Ben Allouch, S., & Jan van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2017). Long-term evaluation of a social robot in real homes. Interaction Studies, 17(3), 462–491.
Sakaki, T., Shimokawa, T., Ushimi, N., Murakami, K., Lee, Y.-K., Tsuruta, K., et al. (2015). Rehabilitation robot in primary walking pattern training for SCI patient at home. International Journal of Medical, Health, Biomedical, Bioengineering and Pharmaceutical Engineering, 9(6), 513–517.
Aquilano, M., Cavallo, F. et al. (2012, August). Ambient assisted living and ageing: Preliminary results of RITA project. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE (pp. 5823–5826). IEEE.
Fortunati, L., Esposito, A., Ferrin, G., & Viel, M. (2014). Approaching social robots through playfulness and doing-it-yourself: children in action. Cognitive Computation, 6(4), 789–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12559-014-9303-y.
Fortunati, L., Esposito, A., Sarrica, M., & Ferrin, G. (2015). Children’s knowledge and imaginary about robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(5), 685–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0316-9.
Mondada, F., Bonani, M., Riedo, F., Briod, M., Pereyre, L., Retornaz, P., et al. (2017). Bringing robotics into formal education using the Thymio open source hardware robot. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, March, 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2016.2636372.
Paradeda, RB, Martinho, C., & Paiva, A. (2017). Persuasion based on personality traits: Using a social robot as storyteller. In Proceeding HRI ‘17. Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 367–368.
Jensen, B., Tomatis, N., Mayor, L., Drygajlo, A., & Siegwart, R. (2005). Robots meet humans-interaction in public spaces. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 52(6), 1–17.
Niemelä, M., Heikkilä, P., & Lammi, H. (2017) A social service robot in a shopping mall: Expectations of the management, retailers and consumers. In Proceeding HRI ‘17. Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 227–228.
Salvini, P. (2017). Urban robotics: Towards responsible innovations for our cities. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. available online March 30, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2017.03.007.
Sone, Y. (2016). Japanese robot culture. New York: Springer.
Cavallo, F., et al. (2014). Development of a socially believable multi-robot solution from town to home. Cognitive Computation, 6(4), 954–967.
Ferrari, G. A. (1984). Meccanica ‘allargata’. In G. Giannantoni & M. Vegetti (Eds.), La scienza ellenistica (pp. 225–296). Napoli: Bibliopolis.
Fortunati, L. (2013). Afterword: Robot conceptualizations between continuity and innovation, intervalla: platform for intellectual exchange 1, “Social Robots and Emotion: Transcending the Boundaries between Humans and ICTs” (pp. 116–129). ISSN 2296–3413. http://www.fus.edu/intervalla/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=18&Itemid=15.
Parlato, E. (1991). Il Volto dell’Utopia: modi e significato dell’automa rinascimentale. In U. Artioli & F. Bartoli (Eds.), Il mito dell’automa (pp. 26–30). Firenze: Artificio.
Rinaldi, A. (1979). La ricerca della ‘terza’ natura: artificialia e naturalia nel giardino toscano del ‘500. In M. Fagiolo (Ed.), Natura e artificio (pp. 154–175). Roma: Officina Edizioni.
Zanca, A. (1991). Il mondo degli automi tra manierismo e secolo dei lumi. In U. Artioli & F. Bartoli (Eds.), Il mito dell’automa (pp. 31–39). Artificio: Firenze.
Baron, N. (2013). Authenticity, emotions, and ICTs. Intervalla: Platform for Intellectual Exchange, 1, 7–16.
Fortunati, L., Esposito, A., & Lugano, G. (2015). Introduction to the special issue “Beyond industrial robotics: Social robots entering public and domestic spheres”. The Information Society, 31(3), 229–236, https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2015.1020195. Published online: May 13, 2015.
Fortunati, L. (2016). Moving robots from industrial sectors to domestic spheres: A foreword. In Anna Esposito & Lakhmi Jain (Eds.), Modeling emotions in robotic socially believable behaving systems (pp. 1–3). Berlin: Springer.
Fortunati, L. (2013). The mobile phone between fashion and design. Mobile Media and Communication, 1(1), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157912459497.
Cavallo, F., Aquilano, M. et al. (2011, August). Multidisciplinary approach for developing a new robotic system for domiciliary assistance to elderly people. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE (pp. 5327–5330). IEEE.
Katz, J. E., & Sugiyama, S. (2005). Mobile phones as fashion statements: The co-creation of mobile communication’s public meaning. In R. Ling & P. Pedersen (Eds.), Mobile communications: Re-negotiation of the social sphere (pp. 63–81). Surrey, UK: Springer.
Amsterdamski, S. (1980). Naturale/artificiale, voce dell’Enciclopedia Einaudi, 9, 792–821.
Foucault, M. (1976–84). Histoire de la sexualité (3 voll). Paris: Editions Gallimard.
Canter, D. (1977). The psychology of place. London: Architectural Press.
Gustafson, P. (2001). Meanings of place: Everyday experience and theoretical conceptualizations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2000.0185.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life, New York (tr. it.: La vita quotidiana come rappresentazione, Bologna 1969).
Bagnasco, A. (2001). Organizzazione sociale dello spazio. Voce dell’ Enciclopedia delle Scienze Sociali. I Supplemento. Roma: Treccani.
Di Masso, A. (2012). Grounding citizenship: Toward a political psychology of public space. Political Psychology, 33(1), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00866.x.
Purini, F. (2007). Spazio pubblico. Voce dell’Enciclopedia Italiana, VII. Appendice. Roma: Treccani.
Lo Monaco, G., Piermattéo, A., Rateau, P., & Tavani, J. L. (2017). Methods for studying the structure of social representations: A critical review and agenda for future research. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 47(3), 306–331. http://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12124.
Ratinaud, P. (2009). IRAMUTEQ: Interface de R pour les Analyses Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires. http://www.iramuteq.org.
Bonaccorsi, M., Fiorini, L., Cavallo, F., Saffiotti, A., & Dario, P. (2016). A cloud robotics solution to improve social assistive robots for active and healthy aging. International Journal of Social Robotics, 8(3), 393–408.
Di Nuovo, A., Broz, F., Belpaeme, T., Cangelosi, A., Cavallo, F., Esposito, R., & Dario, P. (2014, October). A web based multi-modal interface for elderly users of the robot-era multi-robot services. In IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC), 2014 (pp. 2186–2191). IEEE.
Contarello, A., Fortunati, L., Sarrica, M. (2007). Social thinking and the mobile phone: a study of social change with the diffusion of mobile phones, using a social representations framework, mobile phone cultures: special issue of continuum. Journal of Media and Culture, edited by Gerard Goggin, 21(2):149–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310701268687.
Fortunati, L., Manganelli, A. (2007). The social representations of telecommunications. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, published online 16 gennaio (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-006-0139-7); print version (2008) The social representations of telecommunications. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 12(6), 421–431.
Taipale, S., Sarrica, M., de Luca, F., & Fortunati, L. (2015). Europeans’ perception of robots implications for social policies. In J. Vincent, S. Taipale, B. Sapio, L. Fortunati, & G. Lugano (Eds.), Social robots from a human perspective (pp. 11–24). Berlin: Springer.
Taipale, S., Vincent, J., Sapio, B., Lugano, G., & Fortunati, L. (2015). Introduction. In J. Vincent, S. Taipale, B. Sapio, G. Lugano, & L. Fortunati (Eds.), Social robots from a human perspective (pp. 1–7). Berlin: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fortunati, L., Cavallo, F., Sarrica, M. (2019). The Role of Social Robots in Public Space. In: Casiddu, N., Porfirione, C., Monteriù, A., Cavallo, F. (eds) Ambient Assisted Living. ForItAAL 2017. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 540. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04672-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04672-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04671-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04672-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)