Abstract
This chapter explicates the concept of alternative realism , by emphasizing the importance of diplomacy and negotiation for IR theory , and in considering all possible alternative options. It argued, for example, that Morgenthau’s version of realism is closer to social constructionists and gender/feminism than it is to structural realism (or neorealism) or to neo-conservatism . The chapter additionally critiques traditional and neorealist interpretations of the 1648 Treaty of Westphalia that emphasize “territorial state sovereignty” by arguing that the intergovernmental system established by Westphalia actually legitimizes power-sharing and joint sovereignty —concepts that are more associated with social constructionists and gender theorists/feminists than with neorealists. On the negative side, the Westphalia Treaty also set the stage for later Austro-Prussian conflict that resulted in the Seven Years War and Franco-Prussian/German conflict that resulted in World War I and World War II.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsAuthor information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gardner, H. (2019). Radical Disaccord and International Diplomacy. In: IR Theory, Historical Analogy, and Major Power War. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04636-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04636-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04635-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04636-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)