Skip to main content

Timing Matters: Online Dynamics in Broadcast Games

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Web and Internet Economics (WINE 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11316))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 996 Accesses

Abstract

This paper studies the equilibrium states that can be reached in a network design game via natural game dynamics. First, we show that an arbitrarily interleaved sequence of arrivals and departures of players can lead to a polynomially inefficient solution at equilibrium. This implies that the central controller must have some control over the timing of agent arrivals and departures in order to ensure efficiency of the system at equilibrium. Indeed, we give a complementary result showing that if the central controller is allowed to restore equilibrium after every set of arrivals/departures via improving moves, the eventual equilibrium states reached have exponentially better efficiency.

Part of this work was done when all the authors were visiting Microsoft Research - Redmond. Partial support for this work was provided by the following grants: S. Chawla from NSF grants CCF-1101429 and CCF-1320854; S. Naor from ISF grant 1585/15 and BSF grant 2014414; D. Panigrahi from NSF grants CCF-1527084 and CCF-1535972, an NSF CAREER Award CCF-1750140, and faculty research awards from Google and Yahoo; M. Singh from NSF grant CCF-1717947; S. Umboh from ERC consolidator grant 617951 and NSF grant CCF-1320854.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The full version of this paper [12] provides examples illustrating these bounds.

  2. 2.

    Observe that when an agent arrives or makes an improving move, paths of other agents may become suboptimal for them.

  3. 3.

    Charikar et al. also studied a variant where arrivals happen in uniformly random order and are interleaved with adversarially ordered best response moves. For this setting, they were able to prove an upper bound of \(O(\sqrt{n}{\text {polylog}}n)\) on the quality of the equilibria reached, but did not present any lower bounds.

  4. 4.

    Another bound is the optimal Steiner tree on all vertices for which an agent arrived at some point in the dynamics. Since we can assume metric costs, we can restrict our attention to these vertices and then mst cost is within a factor of two of the cost of optimal Steiner tree.

  5. 5.

    Note that although arrivals within a single epoch are simultaneous in that every arriving player picks a best response path with respect to the equilibrium state at the beginning of the epoch, arrivals in different epochs are sequential. In this sense our model captures sequential arrivals with interleaved improving moves.

  6. 6.

    Because of this comparison against the mst, we prefer the term “broadcast game” for this setting, rather than the “multicast game”.

  7. 7.

    The existence of a cycle would imply that one of the agents can improve her cost share by switching to a different path and the current state is not an equilibrium.

References

  1. Aland, S., Dumrauf, D., Gairing, M., Monien, B., Schoppmann, F.: Exact price of anarchy for polynomial congestion games. SIAM J. Comput. 40(5), 1211–1233 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Albers, S.: On the value of coordination in network design. SIAM J. Comput. 38(6), 2273–2302 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Alon, N., Awerbuch, B., Azar, Y., Buchbinder, N., Naor, J.: A general approach to online network optimization problems. ACM Trans. Algorithms 2(4), 640–660 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Anshelevich, E., Dasgupta, A., Kleinberg, J.M., Tardos, É., Wexler, T., Roughgarden, T.: The price of stability for network design with fair cost allocation. SIAM J. Comput. 38(4), 1602–1623 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Awerbuch, B., Azar, Y., Bartal, Y.: On-line generalized steiner problem. Theor. Comput. Sci. 324(2–3), 313–324 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Balcan, M.-F., Blum, A., Mansour, Y.: Circumventing the price of anarchy: leading dynamics to good behavior. SIAM J. Comput. 42(1), 230–264 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Beier, R., Czumaj, A., Krysta, P., Vöcking, B.: Computing equilibria for a service provider game with (im)perfect information. ACM Trans. Algorithms 2(4), 679–706 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Berman, P., Coulston, C.: On-line algorithms for steiner tree problems. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 344–353. ACM (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bilò, V., Bove, R.: Bounds on the price of stability of undirected network design games with three players. J. Interconnect. Netw. 12(1–2), 1–17 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bilò, V., Flammini, M., Moscardelli, L.: The price of stability for undirected broadcast network design with fair cost allocation is constant. In: FOCS, pp. 638–647 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Charikar, M., Karloff, H.J., Mathieu, C., Naor, J., Saks, M.E.: Online multicast with egalitarian cost sharing. In: SPAA, pp. 70–76 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chawla, S., Naor, J., Panigrahi, D., Singh, M., Umboh, S.W.: Timing matters: online dynamics in broadcast games. CoRR, abs/1611.07745 (2016). http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.07745

  13. Chekuri, C., Chuzhoy, J., Lewin-Eytan, L., Naor, J.(Seffi), Orda, A.: Non-cooperative multicast and facility location games. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 25(6), 1193–1206 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, H.-L., Roughgarden, T.: Network design with weighted players. Theory Comput. Syst. 45(2), 302–324 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Christodoulou, G., Chung, C., Ligett, K., Pyrga, E., van Stee, R.: On the price of stability for undirected network design. In: Bampis, E., Jansen, K. (eds.) WAOA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5893, pp. 86–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12450-1_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Ene, A., Chakrabarty, D., Krishnaswamy, R., Panigrahi, D.: Online buy-at-bulk network design. In: IEEE 56th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2015, Berkeley, CA, USA, 17–20 October, 2015, pp. 545–562 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fabrikant, A., Papadimitriou, C.H., Talwar, K.: The complexity of pure Nash equilibria. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, Chicago, IL, USA, 13–16 June 2004, pp. 604–612 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fanelli, A., Leniowski, D., Monaco, G., Sankowski, P.: The ring design game with fair cost allocation. Theor. Comput. Sci. 562, 90–100 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Fiat, A., Kaplan, H., Levy, M., Olonetsky, S., Shabo, R.: On the price of stability for designing undirected networks with fair cost allocations. In: Bugliesi, M., Preneel, B., Sassone, V., Wegener, I. (eds.) ICALP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4051, pp. 608–618. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11786986_53

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Freeman, R., Haney, S., Panigrahi, D.: On the Price of stability of undirected multicast games. In: Cai, Y., Vetta, A. (eds.) WINE 2016. LNCS, vol. 10123, pp. 354–368. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54110-4_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Gupta, A., Ravi, R., Talwar, K., Umboh, S.W.: LAST but not least: online spanners for buy-at-bulk. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2017, 16–19 January, Hotel Porta Fira, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 589–599 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hajiaghayi, M.T., Liaghat, V., Panigrahi, D.: Online node-weighted steiner forest and extensions via disk paintings. In: FOCS, pp. 558–567 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hajiaghayi, M.T., Liaghat, V., Panigrahi, D.: Near-optimal online algorithms for prize-collecting steiner problems. In: Esparza, J., Fraigniaud, P., Husfeldt, T., Koutsoupias, E. (eds.) ICALP 2014. LNCS, vol. 8572, pp. 576–587. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43948-7_48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Harks, T., Klimm, M.: On the existence of pure nash equilibria in weighted congestion games. Math. Oper. Res. 37(3), 419–436 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Imase, M., Waxman, B.M.: Dynamic steiner tree problem. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 4(3), 369–384 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Kawase, Y., Makino, K.: Nash equilibria with minimum potential in undirected broadcast games. Theor. Comput. Sci. 482, 33–47 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee, E., Ligett, K.: Improved bounds on the price of stability in network cost sharing games. In: EC, pp. 607–620 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Li, J.: An O(log(n)/log(log(n))) upper bound on the price of stability for undirected shapley network design games. Inf. Process. Lett. 109(15), 876–878 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Milchtaich, I.: Congestion games with player-specific payoff function. Games Econ. Behav. 13, 111–124 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Monderer, D., Shapley, L.S.: Potential games. Games Econ. Behav. 14, 124–143 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Naor, J., Panigrahi, D., Singh, M.: Online node-weighted steiner tree and related problems. In: FOCS, pp. 210–219 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Qian, J., Umboh, S.W., Williamson, D.P.: Online constrained forest and prize-collecting network design. Algorithmica 80(11), 3335–3364 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Law-Yone, N., Holzman, R.: Strong equilibrium in congestion games. Games Econ. Behav. 21, 85–101 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Rosenthal, R.W.: A class of games possessing pure-strategy Nash equilibria. Int. J. Game Theory 2(1), 65–67 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Ui, T.: A shapley value representation of potential games. Games Econ. Behav. 31(1), 121–135 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Umboh, S.: Online network design algorithms via hierarchical decompositions. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 1373–1387. SIAM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debmalya Panigrahi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chawla, S., Naor, J.(., Panigrahi, D., Singh, M., Umboh, S.W. (2018). Timing Matters: Online Dynamics in Broadcast Games. In: Christodoulou, G., Harks, T. (eds) Web and Internet Economics. WINE 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11316. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04612-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04612-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04611-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04612-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics