Strategy-Proof Incentives for Predictions

  • Amir BanEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11316)


Our aim is to design mechanisms that motivate all agents to reveal their predictions truthfully and promptly. For myopic agents, proper scoring rules induce truthfulness. However, when agents have multiple opportunities for revealing information, and take into account long-term effects of their actions, deception and reticence may appear. Such situations have been described in the literature. No simple rules exist to distinguish between the truthful and the untruthful situations, and a determination has been done in isolated cases only. This is of relevance to prediction markets, where the market value is a common prediction, and more generally in informal public prediction forums, such as stock-market estimates by analysts. We describe three different mechanisms that are strategy-proof with non-myopic considerations, and show that one of them, a discounted market scoring rule, meets all our requirements from a mechanism in almost all prediction settings. To illustrate, we extensively analyze a prediction setting with continuous outcomes, and show how our suggested mechanism restores prompt truthfulness where incumbent mechanisms fail.


  1. Azar, Y., Ban, A., Mansour, Y.: When should an expert make a prediction? In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pp. 125–142. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  2. Ban, A.: Strategy-proof incentives for predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.04867 [cs.GT] (2018)
  3. Brier, G.W.: Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Weather Rev. 78(1950), 1–3 (1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, Y., et al.: Gaming prediction markets: equilibrium strategies with a market maker. Algorithmica 58(4), 930–969 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, Y., Reeves, D.M., Pennock, D.M., Hanson, R.D., Fortnow, L., Gonen, R.: Bluffing and strategic reticence in prediction markets. In: Deng, X., Graham, F.C. (eds.) WINE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4858, pp. 70–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). Scholar
  6. Chen, Y., Waggoner, B.: Informational substitutes. In: 2016 IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pp. 239–247. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  7. Conitzer, V.: Prediction markets, mechanism design, and cooperative game theory. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 101–108. AUAI Press (2009)Google Scholar
  8. De Finetti, B.: La prevision: Ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré 7(1937), 1–68 (1937)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Dimitrov, S., Sami, R.: Non-myopic strategies in prediction markets. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, pp. 200–209. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  10. Gao, X.A., Zhang, J., Chen, Y.: What you jointly know determines how you act: strategic interactions in prediction markets. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 489–506. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  11. Gneiting, T., Raftery, A.E.: Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 102(477), 359–378 (2007). Scholar
  12. Good, I.J.: Rational decisions. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 14(1), 107–114 (1952)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanson, R.: Combinatorial information market design. Inf. Syst. Frontiers 5(1), 107–119 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kong, Y., Schoenebeck, G.: Optimizing Bayesian information revelation strategy in prediction markets: the Alice Bob Alice case. In: LIPIcs-Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, vol. 94. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik (2018)Google Scholar
  15. Tong, Y.L.: The Multivariate Normal Distribution. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, TechnionIsrael Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations