Skip to main content

Ordinal Approximation for Social Choice, Matching, and Facility Location Problems Given Candidate Positions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11316))

Abstract

In this work we consider general facility location and social choice problems, in which sets of agents \(\mathcal {A}\) and facilities \(\mathcal {F}\) are located in a metric space, and our goal is to assign agents to facilities (as well as choose which facilities to open) in order to optimize the social cost. We form new algorithms to do this in the presence of only ordinal information, i.e., when the true costs or distances from the agents to the facilities are unknown, and only the ordinal preferences of the agents for the facilities are available. The main difference between our work and previous work in this area is that while we assume that only ordinal information about agent preferences is known, we know the exact locations of the possible facilities \(\mathcal {F}\). Due to this extra information about the facilities, we are able to form powerful algorithms which have small distortion, i.e., perform almost as well as omniscient algorithms but use only ordinal information about agent preferences. For example, we present natural social choice mechanisms for choosing a single facility to open with distortion of at most 3 for minimizing both the total and the median social cost; this factor is provably the best possible. We analyze many general problems including matching, k-center, and k-median, and present black-box reductions from omniscient approximation algorithms with approximation factor \(\beta \) to ordinal algorithms with approximation factor \(1+2\beta \); doing this gives new ordinal algorithms for many important problems, and establishes a toolkit for analyzing such problems in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abramowitz, B., Anshelevich, E.: Utilitarians without utilities: maximizing social welfare for graph problems using only ordinal preferences. In: AAAI (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anshelevich, E., Bhardwaj, O., Postl, J.: Approximating optimal social choice under metric preferences. In: AAAI (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anshelevich, E., Postl, J.: Randomized social choice functions under metric preferences. In: IJCAI (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anshelevich, E., Sekar, S.: Blind, greedy, and random: algorithms for matching and clustering using only ordinal information. In: AAAI (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anshelevich, E., Sekar, S.: Truthful mechanisms for matching and clustering in an ordinal world. In: Cai, Y., Vetta, A. (eds.) WINE 2016. LNCS, vol. 10123, pp. 265–278. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54110-4_19

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Anshelevich, E., Zhu, W.: Tradeoffs between information and ordinal approximation for bipartite matching. In: Bilò, V., Flammini, M. (eds.) SAGT 2017. LNCS, vol. 10504, pp. 267–279. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66700-3_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Benade, G., Nath, S., Procaccia, A.D., Shah, N.: Preference elicitation for participatory budgeting. In: AAAI (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bhalgat, A., Chakrabarty, D., Khanna, S.: Social welfare in one-sided matching markets without money. In: Goldberg, L.A., Jansen, K., Ravi, R., Rolim, J.D.P. (eds.) APPROX/RANDOM -2011. LNCS, vol. 6845, pp. 87–98. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22935-0_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Bogomolnaia, A., Moulin, H.: Random matching under dichotomous preferences. Econometrica 72(1), 257–279 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Boutilier, C., Caragiannis, I., Haber, S., Lu, T., Procaccia, A.D., Sheffet, O.: Optimal social choice functions: a utilitarian view. Artif. Intell. 227, 190–213 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Byrka, ., Pensyl, T., Rybicki, B., Srinivasan, A., Trinh, K.: An improved approximation for k-median, and positive correlation in budgeted optimization. In: SODA (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Caragiannis, I., Filos-Ratsikas, A., Frederiksen, S.K.S., Hansen, K.A., Tan, Z.: Truthful facility assignment with resource augmentation: an exact analysis of serial dictatorship. In: Cai, Y., Vetta, A. (eds.) WINE 2016. LNCS, vol. 10123, pp. 236–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54110-4_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Caragiannis, I., Nath, S., Procaccia, A.D., Shah, N.: Subset selection via implicit utilitarian voting. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 58, 123–152 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng, Y., Dughmi, S., Kempe, D.: Of the people: voting is more effective with representative candidates. In: EC (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cheng, Y., Dughmi, S., Kempe, D.: On the distortion of voting with multiple representative candidates. In: AAAI (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Christodoulou, G., Filos-Ratsikas, A., Frederiksen, S.K.S., Goldberg, P.W., Zhang, J., Zhang, J.: Social welfare in one-sided matching mechanisms. In: Osman, N., Sierra, C. (eds.) AAMAS 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10002, pp. 30–50. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46882-2_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Enelow, J.M., Hinich, M.J.: The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, New York (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Fain, B., Goel, A., Munagala, K., Sakshuwong, S.: Sequential deliberation for social choice. In: Devanur, N.R., Lu, P. (eds.) WINE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10660, pp. 177–190. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71924-5_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Farahani, R.Z., Hekmatfar, M.: Facility Location: Concepts, Models, Algorithms and Case Studies. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2151-2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Feldman, M., Fiat, A., Golomb, I.: On voting and facility location. In: EC (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Filos-Ratsikas, A., Frederiksen, S.K.S., Zhang, J.: Social welfare in one-sided matchings: random priority and beyond. In: Lavi, R. (ed.) SAGT 2014. LNCS, vol. 8768, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44803-8_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Goel, A., Krishnaswamy, A.K., Munagala, K.: Metric distortion of social choice rules: lower bounds and fairness properties. In: EC (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gross, S., Anshelevich, E., Xia, L.: Vote until two of you agree: mechanisms with small distortion and sample complexity. In: AAAI (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hochbaum, D.S., Shmoys, D.B.: A best possible heuristic for the k-center problem. Math. Oper. Res. 10(2), 180–184 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoefer, M., Kodric, B.: Combinatorial secretary problems with ordinal information. In: ICALP (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Li, S.: A 1.488 approximation algorithm for the uncapacitated facility location problem. In: Aceto, L., Henzinger, M., Sgall, J. (eds.) ICALP 2011. LNCS, vol. 6756, pp. 77–88. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22012-8_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Procaccia, A.D., Rosenschein, J.S.: The distortion of cardinal preferences in voting. In: Klusch, M., Rovatsos, M., Payne, T.R. (eds.) CIA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4149, pp. 317–331. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11839354_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Skowron, P.K., Elkind, E.: Social choice under metric preferences: scoring rules and STV. In: AAAI (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Onkar Bhardwaj for discussion of the lower bound example for the k-median problem. This work was partially supported by NSF award CCF-1527497.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Elliot Anshelevich or Wennan Zhu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Anshelevich, E., Zhu, W. (2018). Ordinal Approximation for Social Choice, Matching, and Facility Location Problems Given Candidate Positions. In: Christodoulou, G., Harks, T. (eds) Web and Internet Economics. WINE 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11316. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04612-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04612-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04611-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04612-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics