Skip to main content

A Complex Approach to Prosodic Discourse Variation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 318 Accesses

Abstract

The confluence of several fields of knowledge , of the work of several linguistic and non-linguistic disciplines allow us to approach a holistic perspective of our research on speech within the complexity theory . It allows us to design the interconnections that emerge from language within the interactions of its means of expression . This perspective leads us to find a new phonological interpretation of prosody , lexical, grammar and speech systems in virtue of intention through speech multidimensional analysis. This also makes possible to explain and describe the bases of a group of semantically and pragmatically founded attractors defined for the study of intonation and a new concept of underlying structure formed by emergent features from the morphogenetic processes of the language systems. This is shown in a case study of a dialogue from the Cuban movie Fresa y chocolate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An overview in Calsamiglia and Tuson (2004) and Morales Lopez (2011).

  2. 2.

    On the new epistemology , the different variants and specifically on the thought of complexity , we will only mention some key works: Prigogine (1983); Capra (2002); Goodwing (1998); Juarrero (1999); Morin (1994); Kauffman (2003); Kennealy (2010); among others.

  3. 3.

    Many researchers define multidiscipline as the “convergent research effort in various disciplines”, such as biophysics or sociolinguistics . Interdisciplinarity presupposes multidiscipline insofar as it has the same goals, but it involves the determination of a new object of study. It is the case of genetic engineering. Transdisciplinarity includes the two previous ways of doing science, but it tries to find points of contact between the different branches, finding these points of contact in a step by step analysis of the different possible interactions.

  4. 4.

    A proposal of these tools for this kind of intonation studies can be found in García Riverón (2005a).

  5. 5.

    García Riverón (2002, 2003).

  6. 6.

    It is very encouraging that the proposal of a cognitive and comprehensive approach we propose of the communication unit at a first level, a unit that certainly has its roots in the Vygotskian psychology, also arises in other latitudes in which other trends in psychology have proliferated. See McNeill (1999) for a similar proposal to develop the “growth points” for the study of gestures.

  7. 7.

    García Riverón (1998: 77).

  8. 8.

    For a full understanding of the joints see the cited literature, especially: Pardo and Losada (2004); García Riverón et al. (2008).

  9. 9.

    Caballero (1995, 1996).

  10. 10.

    The number above the statement, signals in each example the intonation pattern according to the system described for the Spanish variant of Cuba (Appendix 12.1). The number in parentheses refers to the order of the statements in the sample. Indication of the gestures is placed in brackets in the same line of the statement.

  11. 11.

    These dominants were defined in 1998 (García Riverón 1998). Later, researchers of the Grupo-Red have continued working to expand or improve the semantic-pragmatic discursive categories found analyzed in the different discourses .

  12. 12.

    See García Riverón (2005a).

  13. 13.

    We reproduce the full text of a scene of the film, which was fully analyzed, although for reasons of length and to avoid unnecessary tautologies, only the discursive analysis of a few sentences in which these processes are clearly manifested is submitted for the consideration of the reader.

  14. 14.

    The numbering in the text corresponds to the general numbering of the statements in the film.

  15. 15.

    In French in the original: Where is the movies magazine?

  16. 16.

    Conversation in the Cathedral.

  17. 17.

    We understand ideology as Van Dijk (2003), as a set of beliefs shared by a social group.

  18. 18.

    The system is made of Entonemes (E), Entonemes Variants (VE) and Entonemes Realizations (RE).

References

  • Austin, J. (1962). Cómo hacer cosas con palabras. Barcelona: Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, L. (1995). Semiótica y diccionario [Unpublushed book].

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, L. (1996). Ilocuciones valorativas. In G. Wotjak (Ed.), El verbo español. Aspectos morfosintácticos, sociolingüísticos y léxicogenéticos (pp. 93–109). Madrid: Vervuert-Iberoamericana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calsamiglia, H., & Tuson, A. (2004). Las cosas del decir. Manual de análisis del discurso. Barcelona: Ariel Lingüística.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (2002). The hidden connections. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Riverón, R. (1996). Aspectos de la entonación hispánica. I La metodología y II Análisis acústico de muestras del español de Cuba. Cáceres: Universidad de Extremadura.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Riverón, R. (1998). Aspectos de la entonación hispánica. III Funciones de la entonación en el español de Cuba. Cáceres: Universidad de Extremadura.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Riverón, R. (2002). El significado de la entonación: primer acercamiento a los datos. Oralia, 5, 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Riverón, R. (2003). El significado de la entonación. In Z. E. Herrera & M. Butragueño (Eds.) La tonía: dimensiones fonéticas y fonológicas (pp. 245–265). México: El Colegio de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Riverón, R. (2005a). El estudio de la entonación. Moenia, 11, 141–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Riverón, R. (2005b). Nota a la reseña de Francisco Torreira sobre R. García Riverón “El significado de la entonación”. Estudio de Fonética Experimental, XIV, 364–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Riverón, R., Losada, M., & Pardo, A. (2008). El acto de habla interaccional como unidad para el estudio de la oralidad: una visión desde la complejidad, Oralia, 11, 333–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwing, B. (1998). Las manchas del leopardo (A. García, Trans.). Metatemas 51. Barcelona: Tusquets Editores.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juarrero, A. (1999). Dynamics in action: Intentional behavior as a complex system. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. (2003). Investigaciones. Complejidad, autoorganización y nuevas leyes para una biología general (L.E. de Juan, Trans.). Metatemas 76. Barcelona: Tusquets Editores.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennealy, C. (2010). Talking heads. New Scientist, 20, 33–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontiev, L. A. (1962). Jazyk, rech´i rechevaja deatel´nost. Moscú: Ed. Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, A. (1999). Triangulating the growth point. Arriving at consciousness. In L. S. Messing & R. Campbell (Eds.), Gesture and speech and sign. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales Lopez, E. (2011). Hacia dónde va el análisis del discurso. Tonos Digital. Retrieved from www.um.es/tonosdigital.

  • Morin, E. (1994). El Método III. Madrid: Cátedra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardo, A., & Losada, M. (2004). Un acercamiento semántico-cognitivo a la tropología: la metáfora y la metonimia. Moenia, 10, 143–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavis, P. (1988). Diccionario del teatro. Dramaturgia, estética, semiología. Vols I & II. La Habana: Edición Revolucionaria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. (1983). La nueva alianza. Metamorfosis de la ciencia. Madrid: Alianza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1969). Actos de habla. Madrid: Cátedra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1983). Texto y contexto. Un enfoque interdisciplinario. Barcelona: Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. A. (2003). Ideología y discurso. Una introducción Multidisciplinaria. Barcelona: Ariel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigotskii, L. S. (1934/1966). Pensamiento y lenguaje. La Habana: Edición Revolucionaria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1973). Philosophical Investigations (G.E.M. Anscombe, Trans.). (3rd ed.) New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Raquel García Riverón or Alejandro F. Marrero Montero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

12.1 Appendix

12.1 Appendix

Intonation System of the Spanish Variant of Cuba (García Riverón 1996).Footnote 17

figure b
figure c

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

García Riverón, R., Marrero Montero, A.F. (2019). A Complex Approach to Prosodic Discourse Variation. In: Massip-Bonet, À., Bel-Enguix, G., Bastardas-Boada, A. (eds) Complexity Applications in Language and Communication Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04598-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04598-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04596-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04598-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics