Bring ArtScience Collaborations to Life

  • Claudia SchnuggEmail author
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Business, Arts and Humanities book series (PSBAH)


“Artist-in-residence programs reflect a lot the organization and the people and goals in the organization who develop the residency programs,” as the artist Sougwen Chung mentions in our interview about her experience with many different programs. She has been artist-in-residence for artscience projects in corporations, R&D facilities of corporations, scientific organizations, media art settings, and museums. Her experience not only reflects the diversity of settings of the artist-in-residence programs, but points to specific goals the organization has, the (personal and funding) capacities that can be used for the program, their goals and understanding of residency programs, and cultural differences.


  1. Berthoin Antal, A. (2012). Artistic Intervention Residencies and Their Intermediaries: A Comparative Analysis. Organizational Aesthetics, 1(1), 44–67.Google Scholar
  2. Hediger, I., & Scott, J. (2016). Artists-in-Labs: Recomposing Art and Science. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Koek, A. (2017). In/Visible: The Inside Story of the Making of Arts at CERN. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 42(4), 345–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Naiman, L. (2011). An Interview with John Seely Brown About Xerox PARC’s Artist in Residency Program. Creativity at Work. Downloaded from 27 June 2018.
  5. Schnugg, C. A. (2014). Curating and Facilitating Residencies for Artistic Production and Research: Colliding Art, Technology and Science in Residencies. In Proceedings of the 7th Art of Management and Organization Conference 2014, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  6. Scott, J. (2006). Artists-in-Labs: Processes of Inquiry. Vienna/New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Scott, J. (2010). Artists-in-Labs: Networking in the Margins. Vienna/New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Sleigh, C., & Craske, S. (2017). Art and Science in the UK: A Brief History and Critical Reflection. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 42(4), 313–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.WelsAustria

Personalised recommendations