Skip to main content

Quantum Information in the Foundational and Philosophical Debates About Quantum Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quantum Computation and Logic

Part of the book series: Trends in Logic ((TREN,volume 48))

  • 1103 Accesses

Abstract

Researches in the field of quantum information and quantum computation have naturally stimulated new debates about foundational and philosophical problems of quantum theory. “Information interpretations” according to which quantum theory should be mainly regarded as a “revolutionary information theory” have been opposed to more traditional “realistic” assumptions, according to which the pure states of the quantumtheoretic formalism shall always “mirror” objective properties of physical systems that exist (or may exist) in the real world. We analyze some different point of views that have been proposed and discussed in these debates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See [24].

  2. 2.

    An “extreme” form of informational approach to quantum theory has been proposed by the so called “Quantum Bayesianism” (briefly, “QBism”), developed on the lines of a subjectivistic interpretation of probability theory (Ramsey, de Finetti). The basic idea of “quantum bayesianists” is that quantum states have to be interpreted as “belief-degrees” of particular epistemic agents. See, for instance, [9].

  3. 3.

    See [22, 23].

  4. 4.

    See, for instance, [25].

  5. 5.

    For an interesting discussion about the possibility of “realistic” interpretations of quantum theory see, for instance, [21].

  6. 6.

    It is worth-while noticing that this definition of deterministic theory corresponds to a form of determinism that is sometimes called “static”. By “dynamic determinism” one usually means the idea according to which the dynamic equations of the theory under consideration determine for any pure state \({\mathbf {s}}(t)\) (representing the state of a system \({\mathbf {S}}\) at time t) the pure state \({\mathbf {s}}(t')\) of \({\mathbf {S}}\) at any other time \(t'\) (where \(t < t'\) or \(t' < t\)). In this sense one can say that Schrödinger’s equation guarantees a form of probabilistic dynamic determinism for quantum theory.

  7. 7.

    See [8].

  8. 8.

    See [4,5,6, 13].

  9. 9.

    The first no-go theorem has been proved by von Neumann. His proof, however, is based on some general assumptions that have later been considered too strong.

  10. 10.

    See [16, 17].

  11. 11.

    For the concept of partial Boolean algebra see Definition 10.9 (in the Mathematical Survey of Chap. 10).

  12. 12.

    See [13].

  13. 13.

    See [1,2,3].

  14. 14.

    See [7].

  15. 15.

    One can recognize some significant similarities between the many-worlds interpretations and the consistent-histories approaches to quantum mechanics. These latter theories, however, are not necessarily bound to the strong ontological assumptions that characterize the many-worlds interpretations. See, for instance, [14, 15].

  16. 16.

    See [10,11,12].

  17. 17.

    See [19, 20].

  18. 18.

    As is well known, the concept of isolated physical system is an approximated concept: all physical systems are, in fact, embedded in an environment and the borders between a system and its environment cannot be generally determined in a sharp way. The approximation involved in this particular case depends on the choice of the relevant parameters and by the resolving power of the instruments used in the measurement-procedures.

  19. 19.

    See [18].

References

  1. Aspect, A.: Experimental tests of Bell’s Inequalities with correlated photons. In: Pratesi, R., Ronchi, L. (eds.) Waves, Information and Foundations of Physics. A Tribute to Giuliano Toraldo di Francia on his 80th Birthday. Italian Physical Society, Bologna (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aspect, A., Grangier, P., Roger, G.: Experimental tests of realistic local theories via Bell’s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460–463 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aspect, A., Grangier, P., Roger, G.: Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolosky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: a new violation of Bell’Inequalities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91–94 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bell, J.S.: On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447–452 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beltrametti, E., Cassinelli, G.: The Logic of Quantum Mechanics. Encyclopedia of mathematics and its applications, vol. 15, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bohm, D.: Quantum Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewoods Cliffs (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deutsch, D.: The Fabric of Reality. Penguin Books, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: Can quantum mechanical description of reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fuchs, C., Mermin, D., Schack, R.: An introduction to QBism with an application to the locality of quantum mechanics. Am. J. Phys. 82(8), 749–754 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghirardi, G., Rimini, A., Weber, T.: Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems. Phys. Rev. 34 D, 470–491 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ghirardi, G., Rimini, A., Weber, T.: A general argument against superluminal transmission through the quantum mechanical measurement process. Lettere al Nuovo Cimento 27, 293–298 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghirardi, G., Rimini, A., Weber, T.: A model for a unified quantum description of macroscopic and microscopic systems. In: Accardi, L., et al. (eds.) Quantum Probability and Applications. Springer, Berlin (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Giuntini, R.: Quantum Logic and Hidden Variables. Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Griffiths, R.B.: Consistent histories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics. J. Stat. Phys. 36, 219–272 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Isham, C.J.: Quantum logic and the histories approach to quantum theory. J. Math. Phys. 35, 2157–2185 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kochen, S., Specker, E.P.: Logical structures arising in quantum theory. In: Addison, J., Henkin, L., Tarski, A. (eds.) The Theory of Models, pp. 177–189. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kochen, S., Specker, E.P.: The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. J. Math. Mech. 17, 59–87 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mittelstaedt, P.: Rational Reconstruction of Modern Physics. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Penrose, R.: The Emperor’s New Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Penrose, R.: Shadows of the Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  21. van Fraassen, B.C.: Quantum Mechanics. An empiricist view. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  22. von Neumann, J.: Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Springer, Berlin (1932)

    Google Scholar 

  23. von Neumann, J.: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zeilinger, A.: Einsteins Schleier. Verlag C. H. Beck oHG, München, Die neue Welt der Quantenphysik (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zurek, W.H.: Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical - Revisited (2003). arXiv:quant-ph/0306072

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Luisa Dalla Chiara .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dalla Chiara, M.L., Giuntini, R., Leporini, R., Sergioli, G. (2018). Quantum Information in the Foundational and Philosophical Debates About Quantum Theory. In: Quantum Computation and Logic. Trends in Logic, vol 48. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04471-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics