Skip to main content

Abstract

Patents can give a medical device company a key advantage over competitors. If the right patent protection can be obtained, it can keep your competitors out of the market space, while you develop and solidify your products and your brand. A patent may be granted for the invention of any new and useful process, machine, manufacture or composition of matter or any new useful improvement thereof. A patent gives a patent owner a bundle of property rights that grants the inventor the right to exclude others from making, using or selling the medical device invention as defined by the patent’s claims in the United States for a limited period of time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A Request for Continued Examination (RCE) under 37 C.F.R. § 1.114 can be filed upon payment of the requisite fee to present new arguments or claims in an application after a final rejection as an alternative to filing a continuation application.

  2. 2.

    As a reminder, the secondary considerations include: long-felt but unsolved need for the invention, failure of others to create the invention, commercial success of the invention, unexpected results and copying by others.

  3. 3.

    A terminal disclaimer is an official statement by a patent owner that the term of the patent in question is disclaimed, i.e., shortened, to less than the twenty (20) year grant. The patent owner effectively forfeits a portion of the patent’s term and allows the patent to enter the public domain.

References

  1. United States Constitution, Article I, Section 8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 35 U.S.C. § 101.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  4. In re Clark, 522 F.2d 623 (CCPA).

    Google Scholar 

  5. In re Woodruff, 919 F.2d 1575 (Fed. Cir. 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  6. In re Peterson, 315 F.3d 1325 (Fed. Cir. 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Iron Grip Barbell Co., Inc. v. USA Sports, Inc., 392 F.3d 1317 (Fed. Cir. 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  8. In re Kahn, 441 F.3d 977 (Fed. Cir. 2006) (internal citations omitted).

    Google Scholar 

  9. In re Cyclobenzaprine Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsule Patent Litig. Eurand, Inc. v. Mylan Pharms., Inc., 676 F.3d 1063 (Fed. Cir. 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  10. In Gardner v. TEC Syst., Inc., 725 F.2d 1338 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Manual of Patent Examining Procedure §2144.04 (IV) (A).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gentry Gallery, Inc. v. Berkline Corp., 134 F.3d 1473 (Fed. Cir. 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Laitram Corp. v. Rexnord, Inc., 939 F.2d 1533 (Fed. Cir. 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Westvaco Corp. v. Int'l Paper Co., 991 F.2d 735 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (internal citation omitted).

    Google Scholar 

  15. IPXL Holdings, L.L.C. v. Amazon.com, Inc., 430 F.3d 1377 (Fed. Cir. 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. Prometheus Labs., Inc., 566 U.S. 66 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc., 788 F.3d 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Genetic Techs., Ltd. v. Merial LLC, 818 F.3d 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Exergen Corp. v. Kaz USA, Inc., Nos. 2016-2315, 2016-2341, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 6004 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 8, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rapid Litig. Mgmt. v. CellzDirect, Inc., 827 F.3d 1042 (Fed. Cir. 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vanda Pharm. Inc. v. W.-Ward Pharm. Int'l Ltd., Nos. 2016-2707, 2016-2708, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 9360 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 13, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Software as a Medical Device (SAMD): Clinical Evaluation Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff, issued December 8, 2017, available online at https://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/UCM524904.pdf (accessed Aug. 27, 2018).

  23. Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., 822 F.3d 1327 (Fed. Cir. 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Fin. Corp., 850 F.3d 1332 (Fed. Cir. 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Elec. Power Grp., LLC v. Alstom S.A., 830 F.3d 1350 (Fed. Cir. 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int'l, 134 S. Ct. 2347 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 37 C.F.R. § 1.740.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Halt, G.B., Donch, J.C., Stiles, A.R., VanLuvanee, L.J., Theiss, B.R., Blue, D.L. (2019). Patents. In: FDA and Intellectual Property Strategies for Medical Device Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04462-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04462-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04461-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04462-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics