Abstract
Design patent protection maybe granted for the ornamental design of a functional item, such as a medical device, so long as the design is novel and non-obvious. Not only can design patent protection be sought for the overall appearance of a medical device, but protection can also be sought for individual components of a medical device, including graphical user interface icons. Similarly, replacement or consumable components that are designed to be used with a specific medical device could also be protected by design patents. Design patent protection is not unique to the United States. Other parts of the world also allow for unique designs that are used in industry to be legally protected, but by different means than a patent.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The contracting parties to the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit of Industrial Design include: the African Intellectual Property Organization (OAPI), Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Cambodia, Croatia, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Denmark, Egypt, Estonia, the European Union (EU), Finland, France, Gabon, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Holy See, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Japan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Mali, Monaco, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Namibia, Netherlands, Niger, Norway, Oman, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Rwanda, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Serbia, Singapore, Slovenia, Spain, Suriname, Switzerland, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States of America, and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.
References
Sport Dimension, Inc. v. Coleman Co., 820 F.3d 1316, 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2016).
Dobson v. Dornan, 118 U.S. 10, 6 S. Ct. 946, 30 L. Ed. 63, 1886 Dec. Comm’r Pat. 202 (1886).
Pac. Coast Marine Windshields Ltd. v. Malibu Boats, LLC, 739 F.3d 694 (Fed. Cir. 2014).
Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. v. Covidien, Inc., 796 F.3d 1312 (Fed. Cir. 2015).
L.A. Gear, Inc. v. Thom McAn Shoe Co., 988 F.2d 1117 (Fed. Cir. 1993).
Rosco, Inc. v. Mirror Lite Co., 304 F.3d 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2002).
OddzOn Prods. v. Just Toys, 122 F.3d 1396 (Fed. Cir. 1997).
35 U.S. Code § 173.
Samsung Elecs. Co. Ltd v. Apple Inc., 137 S. Ct. 429 (2016).
Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community designs, [2002] O.J. L3.
Patent Law of the People’s Republic of China.
Japanese Patent Act.
Industrial Design Act of Korea.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Halt, G.B., Donch, J.C., Stiles, A.R., VanLuvanee, L.J., Theiss, B.R., Blue, D.L. (2019). Design Protection for Medical Devices. In: FDA and Intellectual Property Strategies for Medical Device Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04462-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04462-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04461-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04462-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)