Skip to main content

Why a “Darwinian” Approach on Religious Evolution?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Religious Speciation

Part of the book series: New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion ((NASR,volume 6))

  • 165 Accesses

Abstract

A short commentary on different models of religious evolution with the following results: Currently, there is no model for the evolution of religions that meets the strict scientific requirements of an evolutionary model. Either the focus is placed on the evolution of the human mind, making it a quest for the evolution of Homo sapiens, or if indeed the correct question is being asked, the evolution of religion, then the issue of the natural evolving unit is not addressed and consequently, the known religions cannot be categorised within an hierarchic-encaptic system, the interpretation of which would have by default indicated an evolutionary process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The social-Darwinian tendencies, i.e. the degradation of non-European peoples and cultures, must instead be traced back to the influential popular-scientific Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation (1844) by Robert Chambers (Wunn 2018, pp. 73–75).

  2. 2.

    Behaviourism traces any behaviour back to mere internal or external stimulation. B. Frederic Skinner, main proponent of behaviourism and a decided critic of religion, interprets religious behaviourisms as the result of operant conditioning (Skinner 1947).

  3. 3.

    A comprehensive overview can be found in Geertz 2015, pp. 388–389.

  4. 4.

    It should thus also become clear why cognitive-scientific approaches are not helpful to us: they allow only intelligent speculation about the origins of religion.

  5. 5.

    We have discussed this issue by resorting to Viktor Witter Turner’s research concerning the connection between social conflict and religious ritual . Consequently, conflict-solving rituals must have been in effect during the early phase of sedentariness and not Norenzayan’s Big Gods (Wunn et al. 2015, pp. 137–154; Wunn and Grojnowski 2016, pp. 153–172).

  6. 6.

    Blackmore (1999, pp. 53, 56), herself an enthusiastic support of the meme, for which she had established an entire theoretical structure, had to admit that “We cannot specify the unit of a meme” and “We do not know the mechanisms for copying and storing memes”.

References

  • Bellah, R. N. (1964). Religious Evolution. American Sociological Review 29 (3), 358–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, S. J. (1999). The Meme Machine. Oxford [GB]: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, M. (1975). Property and the end of affinity (pp. 203–228). In M. Bloch (Ed.) Marxist Analyses and Social Anthropology. London: Malaby Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, M. (2012). Anthropology and the Cognitive Challenge. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, P. (2002). Religion explained. The human instincts that fashion gods, spirits, and ancestors. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1844). Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation. London: John Churchill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1874) The descent on man.and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1987). The Mind’s New Science. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, A. (2015). Religious Belief, Evolution of. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, 2nd edition, Vol. 20. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. (1975). Culture, people, nature: An introduction to general anthropology. New York: Crowell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. (1977). Cannibals and kings: The origins of culture. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2006). Evolution in Four Dimensions. Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Cambridge, Mass., and London, England: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurmain, R., Kilgore, L., Trevathan, Wenda (2012) Essentials of physical anthropology. Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, M. (1984). World view. Novato, California: Chandler & Sharp.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, B. J. (2017). Evolving God. A Provocative View on the Origins of Religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Korb, J. (2010). The level of selection debate: multilevel selection. In P. Kappeler (ed.), Animal behaviour: Evolution and mechanisms (pp.197–211). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krech, V. (2018). Theory and Empiricism of Religious Evolution (THERE): Foundation of a Research Program. Part 1–1. Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft 26/1, pp.1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundt, R. (2015). Contemporary evolutionary theories of culture and the study of religion. London, Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K. (1973, reprint 1998) Das sogenannte Böse. Zur Naturgeschichte der Aggression. München: DTV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithen, S. (1996). The prehistory of the mind. The cognitive origins of art, religion and science. New York: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson N. J. (2014). Understanding Beliefs. Cambridge: MIT Press Essential Knowledge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norenzayan, A. (2013). Big Gods. How Religion Transformed Cooperation and Conflict. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oviedo, L. (2017). Recent Scientific Explanations of Religious Beliefs: A Systematic Account (289–317). In: H.F. Angel, L. Oviedo, R. F. Paloutzian, A. Runehov, and R. J. Seitz (Eds.) Processes of Believing: The Acquisition, Maintenance, and Change in Creditions. Cham: Springer..

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pruetz, J. D., & Bertolani, P. (2007). Savanna Chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes verus, Hunt with Tools. Current Biology 17, March 6, 2007, 412–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruetz, J., Bertolani, P., Boyer Ontl, K., Linshield, S., Shelley, M., and Wessling, E. G. (2015). New evidence on the tool-assisted hunting exhibited by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) in a savannah habitat at Fongoli, Senegal. Royal Society Open Science. Http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on April 15, 2015.

  • Rappaport, R. A. (1968). Pigs for the ancestors. Ritual in the ecology of a New Guinea people. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, R.A. (1999). Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity. Cambridge U.K. et al.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richerson, P. J., & Boyd. R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transforms human evolution. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossano, M. J. (2010). Supernatural selection. How religion evolved. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, G. & Strüber, N. (2018). Wie das Gehirn die Seele macht. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. ([1949], 2002). The Concept of Mind. Chicago: The New University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. & Norenzayan, A. (2004) Religion's evolutionary landscape: counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. The behavioral and brain sciences 27, pp. 713–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz, R.J., Angel, H.-F. (2014). Psychology of Religion and Spirituality: Meaning Making and processes of believing. Religion, Brain and Behavior 4: 22–30; DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2014.891249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seitz, R., Paloutzian, R. F., H.-F. Angel (2017). Processes of believing: Where do they come from? What are they good for? F1000Research 5: 2573. doi: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9773.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shariff, A., Norenzayan, A., Henrich, J. (2010) The birth of high gods. How the cultural evolution of supernatural policing influenced the emergence of complex, cooperative human societies, paving the way for civilization. In: Schaller, M., Norenzayan, A., Heine, S. J., Yamagishi, T., Kameda, T. (eds.): Evolution, culture, and the human mind. New York, London: Psychology press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1947).: Superstition in the Pigeon. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology Vol. 38, pp. 168–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E. C. (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, C. M. (1963). Molimo. Drei Jahre bei den Pygmäen. Köln: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. H. et al. (2017). The emergence and evolution of religion by means of natural selection. New York and London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J., Maryanski, A., Petersen, A. K., Geertz, A. W. (2018) The emergence and evolution of religion by means of natural selection. New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton, N.J.:Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S. (2002). Darwin’s cathedral. Evolution, religion, and the nature of society. Chicago [et al.]: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunn, I. (2005) Die Religionen in vorgeschichtlicher Zeit. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunn, I. (2015). The Crux of a Darwinian Approach on Evolution: What is Evolution, and what did evolve? In G. Hartung & M. Herrgen (Eds.), Interdisziplinäre Anthropologie, Jahrbuch 03/2015: Religion. Wiesbaden: Springer, 83–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunn, I. (2017) Barbaren, Geister, Gotteskrieger. Die Evolution der Religionen - entschlüsselt. Heidelberg: Springer Spektrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunn, I. (2018). Barbaren, Geister, Gotteskrieger. Wie wir uns die Evolution der Religionen vorstellen müssen. Heidelberg: Springer Spektrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunn, I. & Petry, M. (2006) Kognitionswissenschaftliche und ethologische Modelle der Religionsentstehung. Religio 1/2006, pp. 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunn, I., & Grojnowski, D. (2016). Ancestors, Territoriality, and Gods. A Natural History of Religion. Berlin, Heidelberg [et al.]: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wunn, I. et al. (2015). Götter, Gene, Genesis. Die Biologie der Religionsentstehung. Heidelberg: Springer Spektrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne-Edwards, V. C. (1962). Animal dispersion in relation to social behaviour. London, Oliver & Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wunn, I., Grojnowski, D. (2018). Why a “Darwinian” Approach on Religious Evolution?. In: Religious Speciation. New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion , vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04435-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics