Abstract
This chapter develops a framework of analysis by identifying a method of inquiry in the first half of the last century in Japan. It first visits the work of Kitarō Nishida and his theory of place to demonstrate what place looked like in Japan during the period. Then his thought is compared to the Western idea of space and place. In doing so, it argues that, contrary to Cartesian objectivism, in Japan, where people have incessantly imported political theory since the seventh century, the subjectivity and context-dependency of knowledge has been valued more. It aims to achieve two seemingly contradictory tasks: while demonstrating how spatial difference is fundamental, it still seeks for a common ground of analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Quoted from M. Abe and C. Ives’ English translation (1990).
- 2.
John Krummel translated this essay into English in 2012. The ensuing quote is from Krummel’s translation.
- 3.
Here Nishida uses the Chinese character “者,” which in itself means “person.” However, the sound mono in Japanese also means “thing.” This is why mono should be better understood as things in general, not just humans.
- 4.
In Nishida’s original, it is expressed as “nani ni oite.” The literal translation is “upon what,” in which the emphasis is on “at.”
References
Abe, M. 1990. Introduction. In Nishida, K. 1921. An Inquiry into the Good. vii–xxvi. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Agnew, J. 2003. Geopolitics: Re-visioning World Politics. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
———. 2005. Space: Place. In Spaces of Geographical Thought: Deconstructing Human Geography’s Binaries, ed. P. Cloke and R. Johnston, 81–96. London: Sage.
Allen, J. 2012. A More than Relational Geography? Dialogues in Human Geography 2 (2): 190–193.
Berenskoetter, F. 2014. Parameters of a National Biography. European Journal of International Relations 20 (1): 262–288.
Casey, E. 2001. Between Geography and Philosophy: What Does It Mean to Be in the Place-World? Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91 (4): 683–693.
Cavarero, A. 2002. Politicizing Theory. Political Theory 30 (4): 506–532.
Collier, S.J., and A. Ong. 2005. Global Assemblages, Anthropological Problems. In Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, 3–21. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Harvey, D. 2006. Space as a Keyword. In David Harvey: A Critical Reader, ed. N. Castree and D. Gregory. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
———. 2007. The Kantian Roots of Foucault’s Dilemma. In Space, Knowledge and Power: Foucault and Geography, ed. J.W. Crampton and S. Elden, 41–48. Farnham: Ashgate.
———. 2009. Cosmopolitanism and the Geography of Freedom. New York: Columbia University Press.
Howarth, D. 2000. Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Iizuka, K. 1935 –36. Chirigakushi no Shomondai. In Iizuka Kōji Chosakushū, vol. 6, 44–138. Tokyo: Heibonsha. 1975.
Ingold, T. 2008. Bindings Against Boundaries: Entanglements of Life in an Open World. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 40 (8): 1796–1810.
———. 2013. Against Space: Place, Movement, Knowledge. In Boundless Worlds: An Anthropological Approach to Movement, ed. Peter Wynn Kirby, 29–43. New York: Berghahn Books.
Inoguchi, T. 2007. Are There Any Theories of International Relations in Japan? International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7 (3): 369–390.
Jiménez, A.C. 2003. On Space as a Capacity. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 9 (1): 137–153.
Jones, C. 1997. Carr, Mannheim, and a Post-Positivist Science of International Relations. Political Studies 45 (2): 232–246.
Jones, C.S. 2002. If Not a Clash Then What? Huntington, Nishida Kitaro and the Politics of Civilizations. International Relations of Asia-Pacific 2 (2): 223–243.
Katō, S. 2007. Nihon Bunka ni okeru Jikan to Kūkan. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
Kōjien. 1998. In Kijyōban, ed. I. Shinmura, 5th ed. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
Kosaka, K. 2002. Nishida Kitarō no Shisō. Tokyo: Kōdan Sha.
Kōyama, I. 1940. Rekishi no Chirisei to Chiri no Rekishisei. In Sekaishi no Tetsugaku. Tokyo: Kobushi Bunko. 2001.
Krummel, J.W.M. 2012. Translator’s Introduction. Philosophy East and West 62 (1): 44–51.
Mannheim, K. 1985. Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge. Translated from the German to English by L. Wirth and E. Shils. Reprinted edition. London: A Harvest/HBJ Books.
Maraldo, J.C. 2002. Between Individual and Communal, Subject and Object, Self and Other: Mediating Watsuji Testurō’s Hermeneutics. In Japanese Hermeneutics: Current Debates on Aesthetics and Interpretation, ed. M. Marra. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Maruyama, M. 1983 [1952]. Nihon Seiji Shisōshi Kenkyū. New ed. Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai.
Massey, D. 1993. Power-Geometry and a Progressive Sense of Place. In Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change, ed. J. Bird, D. Curtis, T. Putnam, and L. Tickner, 59–69. London: Routledge.
———. 1999. Spaces of Politics. In Human Geography Today, ed. D. Massey, J. Allen, and P. Sarre, 279–294. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Nakamura, Y. 1979. Kyōtsū Kankaku Ron. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
———. 1983. Nishida Kitarō. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
Nakano, R. 2011. Beyond Orientalism and “Reverse Orientalism”: Through the Looking Glass of Japanese Humanism. In International Relations and Non-Western Thought. Imperialism, Colonialism and Investigations of Global Modernity, ed. R. Shilliam, 125–138. London: Routledge.
Nelson, R.D. 1992. The Sociology of Styles of Thought. The British Journal of Sociology 43 (1): 25–54.
Nishida, K. 1911. Zen no Kenkyū. Revised ed. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten. 1950.
———. 1982 [1940]. Nihon Bunka no Mondai. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
———. 1986 [1926]. Basho (Place). In Nishida Kitarō Tetsugaku Ronshū, ed. S. Ueda, vol. I, 67–151. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
———. 1990. An Inquiry into the Good. Translated from Japanese to English by M. Abe and C. Ives. New Heaven: Yale University Press.
———. 1998 [1915]. Jikaku ni okeru Shukan to Hansei. In Nishida Tetsugaku Senshū, ed. R. Ōhashi, 7–33. Kyoto: Tōeisha.
———. 2012 [1926]. The Unsolved Issue of Consciousness. Translated from the Japanese to English by J.W.M. Krummel. Philosophy East and West 62 (1): 51–59.
Ó Tuathail, G. 1996. Critical Geopolitics: The Politics of Writing Global Space. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Ōhashi, R. 1998. Kaisetsu. In Nishida Tetsugaku Senshū. Kyoto: Tōeisha.
Ong, G.G. 2004. Building an IR Theory with ‘Japanese Characteristics’: Nishida Kitaro and ‘Emptiness’. Millennium Journal of International Studies 33 (1): 35–58.
Paasi, A. 2011. Geography, Space, and the Re-emergence of Topological Thinking. Dialogues in Human Geography 1 (3): 299–303.
Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rösch, F., and A. Watanabe. 2017. Approaching the Unsynthesizable in International Politics: Giving Substance to Security Discourses Through Basso Ostinato? European Journal of International Relations 23 (3): 609–629.
Said, E. 1982. Traveling Theory. In The Edward Said Reader, ed. E. Said, M. Bayoumi, and A. Rubin, 195–217. New York: Vintage Books. 2000
———. 2003. Orientalism. London: Penguin Books.
Sakai, N. 2000. Honyaku to shite no Kindai. Shisō 914: 2–7.
Soja, E.W. 1999. Thirdspace: Expanding the Scope of the Geographical Imagination. In Human Geography Today, ed. D. Massey, J. Allen, and P. Sarre, 260–278. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Suenaga, A. 1999. Langu to Lalangu: Soshūru to Rakan ni Okeru Gengogainen to Kigō no Shiisei. Yōroppa Kenkyū 18: 200–220.
Suzuki, S. 2009. Civilization and Empire: China and Japan Encounter with European International Society. London: Routledge.
Thrift, N. 1996. Spatial Formations. London: Sage.
———. 1999. Chapter 15: Steps to an Ecology of Place. In Human Geography Today, ed. D. Massey, J. Allen, and P. Sarre. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Tosaka, J. 1935. Nihon Ideologıˉ Ron. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten. 1977.
Valentine, G. 1999. Imagined Geographies: Geographical Knowledges of Self and Other in Everyday Life. In Human Geography Today, ed. D. Massey, J. Allen, and P. Sarre, 47–61. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Vico, G. 1987. Gakumon no Hōhō. Translated from the Italian to Japanese by T. Uemura et al. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
———. 1990. On the Study Method of Our Time. Translated from the Italian to English by Elio Gianturico. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company.
Watanabe, A. 2017. “Place” in an Inverted World? A Japanese Theory of Place. In The Question of Space: Interrogating the Spatial Turn Between Disciplines, ed. M. Nieuwenhuis and D. Crouch, 97–113. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Watanabe, A., and F. Rösch. 2018. Conclusion: Is There Any Japanese International Relations Theory? In Japanese Political Thought and International Relations, ed. F. Rösch and A. Watanabe, 241–252. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Watanabe, A., and A. Shangguan. 2018. How Did Two Daos Perceive the International Differently? In Japanese Political Thought and International Relations, ed. F. Rösch and A. Watanabe, 23–42. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Watanabe, A. (2019). Analytical Framework. In: Japanese Geopolitics and the Western Imagination. Critical Security Studies in the Global South. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04399-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04399-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04398-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04399-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)