Skip to main content

Analytical Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Japanese Geopolitics and the Western Imagination

Part of the book series: Critical Security Studies in the Global South ((CSSGS))

  • 280 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter develops a framework of analysis by identifying a method of inquiry in the first half of the last century in Japan. It first visits the work of Kitarō Nishida and his theory of place to demonstrate what place looked like in Japan during the period. Then his thought is compared to the Western idea of space and place. In doing so, it argues that, contrary to Cartesian objectivism, in Japan, where people have incessantly imported political theory since the seventh century, the subjectivity and context-dependency of knowledge has been valued more. It aims to achieve two seemingly contradictory tasks: while demonstrating how spatial difference is fundamental, it still seeks for a common ground of analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Quoted from M. Abe and C. Ives’ English translation (1990).

  2. 2.

    John Krummel translated this essay into English in 2012. The ensuing quote is from Krummel’s translation.

  3. 3.

    Here Nishida uses the Chinese character “者,” which in itself means “person.” However, the sound mono in Japanese also means “thing.” This is why mono should be better understood as things in general, not just humans.

  4. 4.

    In Nishida’s original, it is expressed as “nani ni oite.” The literal translation is “upon what,” in which the emphasis is on “at.”

References

  • Abe, M. 1990. Introduction. In Nishida, K. 1921. An Inquiry into the Good. vii–xxvi. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, J. 2003. Geopolitics: Re-visioning World Politics. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Space: Place. In Spaces of Geographical Thought: Deconstructing Human Geography’s Binaries, ed. P. Cloke and R. Johnston, 81–96. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. 2012. A More than Relational Geography? Dialogues in Human Geography 2 (2): 190–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenskoetter, F. 2014. Parameters of a National Biography. European Journal of International Relations 20 (1): 262–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, E. 2001. Between Geography and Philosophy: What Does It Mean to Be in the Place-World? Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91 (4): 683–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavarero, A. 2002. Politicizing Theory. Political Theory 30 (4): 506–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, S.J., and A. Ong. 2005. Global Assemblages, Anthropological Problems. In Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, 3–21. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. 2006. Space as a Keyword. In David Harvey: A Critical Reader, ed. N. Castree and D. Gregory. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. The Kantian Roots of Foucault’s Dilemma. In Space, Knowledge and Power: Foucault and Geography, ed. J.W. Crampton and S. Elden, 41–48. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Cosmopolitanism and the Geography of Freedom. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, D. 2000. Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iizuka, K. 1935 –36. Chirigakushi no Shomondai. In Iizuka Kōji Chosakushū, vol. 6, 44–138. Tokyo: Heibonsha. 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. 2008. Bindings Against Boundaries: Entanglements of Life in an Open World. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 40 (8): 1796–1810.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Against Space: Place, Movement, Knowledge. In Boundless Worlds: An Anthropological Approach to Movement, ed. Peter Wynn Kirby, 29–43. New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoguchi, T. 2007. Are There Any Theories of International Relations in Japan? International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7 (3): 369–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, A.C. 2003. On Space as a Capacity. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 9 (1): 137–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. 1997. Carr, Mannheim, and a Post-Positivist Science of International Relations. Political Studies 45 (2): 232–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C.S. 2002. If Not a Clash Then What? Huntington, Nishida Kitaro and the Politics of Civilizations. International Relations of Asia-Pacific 2 (2): 223–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katō, S. 2007. Nihon Bunka ni okeru Jikan to Kūkan. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kōjien. 1998. In Kijyōban, ed. I. Shinmura, 5th ed. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosaka, K. 2002. Nishida Kitarō no Shisō. Tokyo: Kōdan Sha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kōyama, I. 1940. Rekishi no Chirisei to Chiri no Rekishisei. In Sekaishi no Tetsugaku. Tokyo: Kobushi Bunko. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krummel, J.W.M. 2012. Translator’s Introduction. Philosophy East and West 62 (1): 44–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, K. 1985. Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge. Translated from the German to English by L. Wirth and E. Shils. Reprinted edition. London: A Harvest/HBJ Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maraldo, J.C. 2002. Between Individual and Communal, Subject and Object, Self and Other: Mediating Watsuji Testurō’s Hermeneutics. In Japanese Hermeneutics: Current Debates on Aesthetics and Interpretation, ed. M. Marra. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maruyama, M. 1983 [1952]. Nihon Seiji Shisōshi Kenkyū. New ed. Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. 1993. Power-Geometry and a Progressive Sense of Place. In Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change, ed. J. Bird, D. Curtis, T. Putnam, and L. Tickner, 59–69. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Spaces of Politics. In Human Geography Today, ed. D. Massey, J. Allen, and P. Sarre, 279–294. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, Y. 1979. Kyōtsū Kankaku Ron. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1983. Nishida Kitarō. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakano, R. 2011. Beyond Orientalism and “Reverse Orientalism”: Through the Looking Glass of Japanese Humanism. In International Relations and Non-Western Thought. Imperialism, Colonialism and Investigations of Global Modernity, ed. R. Shilliam, 125–138. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.D. 1992. The Sociology of Styles of Thought. The British Journal of Sociology 43 (1): 25–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishida, K. 1911. Zen no Kenkyū. Revised ed. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten. 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1982 [1940]. Nihon Bunka no Mondai. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986 [1926]. Basho (Place). In Nishida Kitarō Tetsugaku Ronshū, ed. S. Ueda, vol. I, 67–151. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. An Inquiry into the Good. Translated from Japanese to English by M. Abe and C. Ives. New Heaven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998 [1915]. Jikaku ni okeru Shukan to Hansei. In Nishida Tetsugaku Senshū, ed. R. Ōhashi, 7–33. Kyoto: Tōeisha.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012 [1926]. The Unsolved Issue of Consciousness. Translated from the Japanese to English by J.W.M. Krummel. Philosophy East and West 62 (1): 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ó Tuathail, G. 1996. Critical Geopolitics: The Politics of Writing Global Space. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ōhashi, R. 1998. Kaisetsu. In Nishida Tetsugaku Senshū. Kyoto: Tōeisha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, G.G. 2004. Building an IR Theory with ‘Japanese Characteristics’: Nishida Kitaro and ‘Emptiness’. Millennium Journal of International Studies 33 (1): 35–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paasi, A. 2011. Geography, Space, and the Re-emergence of Topological Thinking. Dialogues in Human Geography 1 (3): 299–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rösch, F., and A. Watanabe. 2017. Approaching the Unsynthesizable in International Politics: Giving Substance to Security Discourses Through Basso Ostinato? European Journal of International Relations 23 (3): 609–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. 1982. Traveling Theory. In The Edward Said Reader, ed. E. Said, M. Bayoumi, and A. Rubin, 195–217. New York: Vintage Books. 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Orientalism. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakai, N. 2000. Honyaku to shite no Kindai. Shisō 914: 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E.W. 1999. Thirdspace: Expanding the Scope of the Geographical Imagination. In Human Geography Today, ed. D. Massey, J. Allen, and P. Sarre, 260–278. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suenaga, A. 1999. Langu to Lalangu: Soshūru to Rakan ni Okeru Gengogainen to Kigō no Shiisei. Yōroppa Kenkyū 18: 200–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, S. 2009. Civilization and Empire: China and Japan Encounter with European International Society. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. 1996. Spatial Formations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Chapter 15: Steps to an Ecology of Place. In Human Geography Today, ed. D. Massey, J. Allen, and P. Sarre. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosaka, J. 1935. Nihon Ideologıˉ Ron. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten. 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, G. 1999. Imagined Geographies: Geographical Knowledges of Self and Other in Everyday Life. In Human Geography Today, ed. D. Massey, J. Allen, and P. Sarre, 47–61. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vico, G. 1987. Gakumon no Hōhō. Translated from the Italian to Japanese by T. Uemura et al. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. On the Study Method of Our Time. Translated from the Italian to English by Elio Gianturico. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, A. 2017. “Place” in an Inverted World? A Japanese Theory of Place. In The Question of Space: Interrogating the Spatial Turn Between Disciplines, ed. M. Nieuwenhuis and D. Crouch, 97–113. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, A., and F. Rösch. 2018. Conclusion: Is There Any Japanese International Relations Theory? In Japanese Political Thought and International Relations, ed. F. Rösch and A. Watanabe, 241–252. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, A., and A. Shangguan. 2018. How Did Two Daos Perceive the International Differently? In Japanese Political Thought and International Relations, ed. F. Rösch and A. Watanabe, 23–42. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atsuko Watanabe .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Watanabe, A. (2019). Analytical Framework. In: Japanese Geopolitics and the Western Imagination. Critical Security Studies in the Global South. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04399-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics