Abstract
In Nikolai Vasilievich Gogol’s (1809–1852) Dead Souls (1842), a novel belonging to the global literary canon, the middleclass, economic concept of the honourable businessman is evoked ex negativo: by the foil Pavel Ivanovich Chichikov, a dubious profiteer and fraudulent speculator. Chichikov plans large-scale credit fraud in provincial Russia based on the illegal idea of taking out a loan against so-called “dead souls”, i.e. dead serfs. Referring to more recent contributions on the relationship between literary and economic discourses and taking into account the social-historical situation in nineteenth century Russia as well as the literary context, this contribution investigates the legal, moral, economic, metaphysical and anthropological implications of this fictive planned deception. From the perspective of ‘economic literature’, Gogol’s novel can be read as a result of dealing with disconcertment through fiction, but also as a product of the fascination sparked by the spirit of modern capitalism that was perceived as new and predominantly ‘un-Russian’, by the eldritch and uncanny way in which money works, and by the credit economy, still unusual in Russia. Furthermore, this contribution also shows that Gogol’s satirical novel reveals striking structural parallels to current literary and filmic portrayals of today’s financial crises.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
See also the economic aspects in Günther (2001).
- 4.
See Russian literature and cultural history in general from an economic perspective in Weitlaner (2001).
- 5.
Cf. inter alia Nohejl (2009).
- 6.
Hörisch (1998), p. 32.
- 7.
Günther (2003), p. 235.
- 8.
Cf. Vogl (2010/2011).
- 9.
Gogol (2013), p. 309.
- 10.
Ibid., p. 9.
- 11.
Ibid., p. 361.
- 12.
Stender-Petersen (1986), p. 179.
- 13.
Gogol (2013), p. 362.
- 14.
Ibid., p. 362.
- 15.
Ibid., p. 225.
- 16.
Gerigk (2007), p. 127.
- 17.
- 18.
Sombart (1920), p. 121.
- 19.
Ibid., p. 121.
- 20.
Gogol (2013), p. 364.
- 21.
Günther (2003), p. 227.
- 22.
Cf. In detail Valentino (1998).
- 23.
- 24.
- 25.
Gogol (2013), p. 362.
- 26.
For more information about the concerns due to the upcoming credit business and its causes in the eighteenth century see Vogl (2010/2011), pp. 53-82.
- 27.
Günther (2003), p. 235.
- 28.
Gerigk (2007), p. 125.
- 29.
- 30.
Cf. Tschilschke (1996), pp. 97f.
- 31.
Gogol (2013), p. 341.
- 32.
Ibid., p. 340.
- 33.
See economic historian Klaus Heller (2006), p. 1: “If, in the post-Soviet period, the historical role of the traditional Russian merchant on his way to becoming a modern entrepreneur and bourgeois is viewed rather positively, it indicates a decided departure from a picture of the Russian merchant, often distorted in public and especially in literature (kupec) with mostly repulsive features, whose origins extend beyond the Soviet era to the nineteenth century and earlier. Thus, even in Tsarist Russia, it was socially acceptable for anyone who believed himself to be superior by social status or education, looked down upon the merchant, and indeed regarded him as a social non-person who had always only been identified by ‘dishonor’.”
- 34.
Günther (2003), p. 237.
- 35.
Gogol (2013), p. 359.
- 36.
Ibid., p. 365.
- 37.
Ibid., p. 366.
- 38.
- 39.
Chizhevsky (1966), p. 76.
- 40.
Günther (2003), p. 236.
- 41.
See inter alia Conrad (2013), pp. 623f.
- 42.
Göttler (2013), p. 14.
- 43.
See Elistratov (2009), p. 169.
- 44.
See Vogl (2010/2011), p. 10.
- 45.
Bibliography
Chizhevsky, Dmitry [Tschižewskij, Dmitrij]. 1966. Der unbekannte Gogolʼ. In Gogolʼ, Turgenev, Dostoevskij, Tolstoj. Zur russischen Literatur des 19. Jahrhunderts, ed. Dmitrij Tschižewskij, 57–87. München: Fink.
Conrad, Barbara. 2013. Nachwort. In Tote Seelen, ed. Nikolai Gogol, 614–635. Trans. V. Bischitzky. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.
Elistratov, Vladimir. 2009. Chichikov i ipotechnoye kreditovanye: k metafisikye finansovogo krisisa. Znamya. Literaturny i Obshestwenno-Politichesky Shurnal 7: 169–173. http://magazines.russ.ru/znamia/2009/7/el18.html. Accessed: 22 Dec 2015.
Fanger, Donald. 1995. Nabokov and Gogol. In The Garland companion to Vladimir Nabokov, ed. Vladimir E. Alexandrov, 420–428. New York: Garland.
Figes, Orlando. 2011. Nataschas Tanz. Eine Kulturgeschichte Russlands. Trans. S. Baumann, B. Rullkötter. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.
Gerigk, Horst-Jürgen. 2007. Nikolaj Gogolʼ: Mertvye duši (Die toten Seelen). In Der russische Roman, ed. Bodo Zelinsky and Jens Herlth, 117–138, 501–503. Köln: Böhlau.
Ginzburg, Natalia. 1990. Anton Čechov. Ein Leben. Trans. M. Pflug. Berlin: Wagenbach.
Gogol, Nikolai. 2013. Tote Seelen. Ein Poem. Trans. V. Bischitzky. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.
Göttler, Fritz. 2013. Drive einer Leibeigenen-Blase – Gogols “Tote Seelen”, neu übersetzt. Süddeutsche Zeitung, 14. 6.12.2013.
Günther, Hans. 2001. Homo oeconomicus und russische Kultur. Zu Gončarovs Roman Oblomov. In Kultur, Sprache, Ökonomie. Beiträge zur gleichnamigen Tagung an der Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien 3.-5. Dezember 1999, ed. Wolfgang Weitlaner, 101–113. Wien: Gesellschaft zur Förderung slawistischer Studien.
———. 2003. Ökonomie und Religion in Gogol’s “Mertvye duši”. Die Welt der Slaven. Halbjahresschrift für Slavistik XLVIII (2): 227–238.
Häusler, Eugen. 1935. Der Kaufmann in der russischen Literatur. Königsberg: Gräfe und Unzer.
Heller, Klaus. 2006. Geschichte des modernen Unternehmertums in Russland bis 1917. Digitales Handbuch zur Geschichte und Kultur Russlands und Osteuropas. Vol. 17. https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/760/1/Heller_Unternehmertum.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2015.
Hörisch, Jochen. 1998. Kopf oder Zahl. Die Poesie des Geldes. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Marx, Karl, und Friedrich Engels. 1975. Das Kapital. Vol. 1. Berlin: Dietz.
Nabokov, Vladimir. 1983. Nikolay Gogol (1809–1852). In Lectures on Russian literature, ed. Fredson Bowers, 15–61. London: Picador.
Nohejl, Regine. 2009. “Das Andere des Westens” und die “Arche Noah der Weltkultur”. Zur Spezifik von Identität und Alterität in russischen kulturgeschichtlichen Diskursen. München/Berlin: Otto Sagner.
Simmel, Georg. 1989. Philosophie des Geldes. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Sombart, Werner. 1920. Der Bourgeois. Zur Geistesgeschichte des modernen Wirtschaftsmenschen. 5. und 6. Tausend. München/Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
Stender-Petersen, Adolf. 1986. Geschichte der russischen Literatur. Trans. W. Krämer. 4th ed. München: Beck.
von Tschilschke, Christian. 1996. Epen des Trivialen. N.V. Gogols “Die toten Seelen” und G. Flauberts “Bouvard und Pécuchet”. Ein struktureller und thematischer Vergleich. Heidelberg: Winter.
Valentino, Russell Scott. 1998. A catalogue of commercialism in Nikolai Gogol’s “Dead Souls”. Slavic Review 57 (3): 543–562.
Vogl, Joseph. 2010/2011. Das Gespenst des Kapitals. 3rd ed. Zürich: Diaphanes.
Weitlaner, Wolfgang, ed. 2001. Kultur, Sprache, Ökonomie. Beiträge zur gleichnamigen Tagung an der Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien 3.-5. Dezember 1999. Wien: Gesellschaft zur Förderung slawistischer Studien.
Zweynert, Joachim. 2002. Eine Geschichte des ökonomischen Denkens in Rußland 1805–1905. Marburg: Metropolis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
von Tschilschke, C. (2019). “A Traveling Salesman from Hades”. On the Critique of the Acquisitive Mindset in Nikolai V. Gogol’s Novel Dead Souls (1842). In: Lütge, C., Strosetzki, C. (eds) The Honorable Merchant – Between Modesty and Risk-Taking. Ethical Economy, vol 56. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04351-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04351-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04350-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04351-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)