Abstract
In this paper, we present the magnetoencephalography system developed by the Institute of Applied Sciences and Intelligent Systems of the National Research Council and recently installed in a clinical environment. The system employ ultra high sensitive magnetic sensors based on superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs). SQUID sensors have been realized using a standard trilayer technology that ensures good performances over time and a good signal-to-noise ratio, even at low frequencies. They exhibit a spectral density of magnetic field noise as low as 2 fT/Hz1/2. Our system consists of 163 fully-integrated SQUID magnetometers, 154 channels and 9 references, and all of the operations are performed inside a magnetically-shielded room having a shielding factor of 56 dB at 1 Hz. Preliminary measurement have demonstrated the effectiveness of the MEG system to perform useful measurements for clinical and neuroscience investigations. Such a magnetoencephalography is the first system working in a clinical environment in Italy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Granata, C., Vettoliere, A.: Nano superconducting quantum interference device: a powerful tool for nanoscale investigations. Phys. Rep. 614, 1 (2016)
Clarke, J., Braginski, A.I. (eds.): The SQUID Handbook Vol II: Fundamentals and Technology of SQUIDs and SQUID Systems. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA, Weinheim (2006)
Del Gratta, C., Pizzella, V., Tecchio, F., Romani, G.L.: Magnetoencephalography—a noninvasive brain imaging method with 1 ms time resolution. Rep. Progr. Phys. 64, 1759–1814 (2001)
Stam, C.J., Nolte, G., Daffertshofer, A.: Phase lag index: assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources. Hum. Brain Mapp. 28, 1178–1193 (2007)
Tass, P., Rosenblum, M.G, Weule, J. Kurths, J., Pikovsky, A., Volkmann, J., Schnitzler, A., Freund, H.-J.: Detection of n:m phase locking from noisy data: application to magnetoencephalography. Phy. Rev. Lett. 81, 3291–3294 (1998)
Bullmore, E., Sporns, O.: Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 186–198 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2575
Van Wijk, B.C.M., Stam, C.J., Daffertshofer, A.: Comparing brain networks of different size and connectivity density using graph theory. PLoS One 5(10), e13701 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013701
Granata, C., Vettoliere, A., Rombetto, S., Nappi, C., Russo, M.: Performances of compact integrated superconducting magnetometers for biomagnetic imaging. J. Appl. Phys. 104(073905), 1–5 (2008)
Granata, C., Vettoliere, A., Russo, M.: Miniaturized superconducting quantum interference magnetometers for high sensitivity applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 122509 (2007)
Rombetto, S., Granata, C., Vettoliere, A., Russo, M.: Multichannel system based on a high sensitivity superconductive sensor for magnetoencephalography. Sensors 14, 12114–12126 (2014)
Gross, J., Baillet, S., Barnes, G.R., Henson, R.N., Hillebrand, A., Jensen, O., Jerbi, K., Litvak, V., Maess, B., Oostenveld, R., Parkkonen, L., Taylor, J.R., van Wassenhove, V., Wibral, M., Schoffelen, J.-M.: Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research. Neuroimage 65, 349–63 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.001
Barbati, G., Porcaro, C., Zappasodi, F., Rossini, P.M., Tecchio, F.: Optimization of an independent component analysis approach for artifact identification and removal in magnetoencephalographic signals. Clin. Neurophysiol. 115, 1220–1232 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2003.12.015
Van Veen, B.D., Van Drongelen, W., Yuchtman, M., Suzuki, A.: Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 44 (1997)
Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Landeau, B., Papathanassiou, D., Crivello, F., Etard, O., Delcroix, N., Mazoyer, B., Joliot, M.: Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage. 15, 273–89 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0978
Nolte, G.: The magnetic lead field theorem in the quasi-static approximation and its use for magnetoencephalography forward calculation in realistic volume conductors. Phys. Med. Biol. 48, 3637–3652 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/48/22/002
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Granata, C. et al. (2019). Magnetoencephalography System Based on Quantum Magnetic Sensors for Clinical Applications. In: Andò, B., et al. Sensors. CNS 2018. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 539. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04324-7_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04324-7_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04323-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04324-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)