Abstract
Purpose-built low-energy homes have been the subject of policy and researcher scrutiny for many years, and there is plenty of evidence that they deliver substantial energy and carbon emission savings. But are these the best metrics to assess their benefits? What do the occupants think are the most important aspects of living in low-energy and near net zero energy homes? This paper investigates the stories told by households living in purpose-built low-energy homes in the UK, and examines the user experiences that are most important to them. What we find is that the user experience is highly personal, is strongly linked to health and wellbeing experiences, and is focussed around family outcomes rather than rather abstract energy or environmental outcomes. This research has led to the conclusion that we may be asking the wrong questions about purpose-built low-energy homes, and using the wrong metrics to assess the benefits.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Sørensen, Å., Imenes, A., Grynning, S., Dokka, T.: Energy measurements at Skarpnes zero energy homes in Southern Norway: do the loads match up with the on-site energy production? Energy Procedia 132, 567–573 (2017)
Kim, S.-K., Lee, S.-J., Kwon, H.J., Ahn, M.: Zero-energy home development in Korea: energy-efficient and environmentally friendly design features and future directions. Hous. Soc. 42(3), 222–238 (2015)
Berry, S., Whaley, D., Davidson, K., Saman, W.: Do the numbers stack up? Lessons from a zero carbon housing estate. Renew. Energy 67, 80–89 (2014)
Miller, W., Buys, L., Bell, J.: Performance evaluation of eight contemporary passive solar homes in subtropical Australia. Build. Environ. 56, 57–68 (2012)
Pretlove, S., Kade, S.: Post occupancy evaluation of social housing designed and built to Code for Sustainable Homes levels 3, 4 and 5. Energy Build. 110, 120–134 (2016)
Thomas, W., Duffy, J.: Energy performance of net-zero and near net-zero energy homes in New England. Energy Build. 67, 551–558 (2013)
Monahan, J., Powell, J.: A comparison of the energy and carbon implications of new systems of energy provision in new build housing in the UK. Energy Policy 39(1), 290–298 (2011)
Moran, P., Goggins, J., Hajdukiewicz, M.: Super-insulate or use renewable technology? Life cycle cost, energy and global warming potential analysis of nearly zero energy buildings (NZEB) in a temperate oceanic climate. Energy Build. 139, 590–607 (2017)
Din, A., Brotas, L.: Exploration of life cycle data calculation: lessons from a Passivhaus case study. Energy Build. 118, 82–92 (2016)
Berry, S., Davidson, K.: Zero energy homes – are they economically viable? Energy Policy 85, 12–21 (2015)
Moore, T.: Modelling the through-life costs and benefits of detached zero (net) energy housing in Melbourne, Australia. Energy Build. 70, 463–471 (2014)
Zero Carbon Hub. Cost Analysis: Meeting the Zero Carbon Standard. Zero Carbon Hub, London (2014)
Berry, S., Whaley, D.: the implications of mandating photovoltaics on all new homes. Energy Procedia 83, 91–100 (2015)
Eon, C., Morrison, G.M., Byrne, J.: The influence of design and everyday practices on individual heating and cooling behaviour in residential homes. Energy Effic. 11(2), 273–293 (2018)
Strengers, Y., Nicholls, L., Maller, C.: Curious energy consumers: humans and nonhumans in assemblages of household practice. J. Consum. Cult. 16(3), 761–780 (2016)
Moezzi, M., Janda, K.B., Rotmann, S.: Using stories, narratives, and storytelling in energy and climate change research. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 31, 1–10 (2017)
Day, J.K., O’Brien, W.: Oh behave! Survey stories and lessons learned from building occupants in high-performance buildings. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 31, 11–20 (2017)
Goodchild, B., Ambrose, A., Maye-Banbury, A.: Storytelling as oral history: Revealing the changing experience of home heating in England. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 31, 137–144 (2017)
Matthews, B., Ross, L.: Research Methods: A Practical Guide for the Social Sciences. Pearson Longman, Essex (2010)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to recognise the kind assistance of Dr Aimee Ambrose, Professor Barry Goodchild and Dr Angela Maye-Banbury from Sheffield Hallam University for facilitating a number of the interviews discussed in this paper. Funding for this project was provided by the Australian Technology Network of Universities Science and Research Priorities Seed Fund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Berry, S., Moore, T., Sheriff, G., Whaley, D. (2019). Low-Energy Housing: Are We Asking the Right Questions?. In: Kaparaju, P., Howlett, R., Littlewood, J., Ekanyake, C., Vlacic, L. (eds) Sustainability in Energy and Buildings 2018. KES-SEB 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 131. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04293-6_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04293-6_43
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04292-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04293-6
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)