Advertisement

MAESTRI Toolkit for Industrial Symbiosis: Overview, Lessons Learnt and Implications

  • Maria HolgadoEmail author
  • Steve Evans
  • Miriam Benedetti
  • Merane Dubois
  • Yan Li
  • Dai Morgan
  • Enrico Ferrera
  • Rosaria Rossini
  • Antόnio J. Baptista
  • Emanuel Lourenço
  • Eduardo J. Silva
  • Marco A. Estrela
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 130)

Abstract

This paper presents a structured approach to support the development of self-organized industrial symbiosis, the Toolkit for Industrial Symbiosis. Developed within MAESTRI project, it provides a set of tools and methods to help companies gain value from wasted resources and contributes to MAESTRI goal of advancing the sustainability of European manufacturing and process industry. A participatory approach was taken for its development. The ultimate objective of this work is to encourage companies to change their attitude and consider waste as a resource and potential source for value creation.

Keywords

Industrial Symbiosis Toolkit Eco-efficiency Resource efficiency Internet of Things 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant no. 680570).

References

  1. 1.
    Homrich, A.S., Galvão, G., Abadia, L.G., Carvalho, M.M.: The circular economy umbrella: trends and gaps on integrating pathways. J. Cleaner Prod. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jiménez-Rivero, A., García-Navarro, J.: Exploring factors influencing post-consumer gypsum recycling and landfilling in the European Union. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 116, 116–123 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Holgado, M., Morgan, D., Evans, S.: Exploring the scope of industrial symbiosis: implications for practitioners. In: Sustainable Design and Manufacturing 2016, pp. 169–178. Springer, Cham (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jacobsen, N.B.: Industrial symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark: a quantitative assessment of economic and environmental aspects. J. Ind. Ecol. 10(1–2), 239–255 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sakr, D., Baas, L., El-Haggar, S., Huisingh, D.: Critical success and limiting factors for eco-industrial parks: global trends and Egyptian context. J. Cleaner Prod. 19(11), 1158–1169 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chertow, M.R.: “Uncovering” industrial symbiosis. J. Ind. Ecol. 11(1), 11–30 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ferrera, E., Rossini, R., Baptista, A.J., Evans, S., Hovest, G.G., Holgado, M., Lezak, E., Lourenço, E.J., Masluszczak, Z., Schneider, A., Silva, E.J.: Toward industry 4.0: efficient and sustainable manufacturing leveraging MAESTRI total efficiency framework. In: International Conference on Sustainable Design and Manufacturing, pp. 624–633. Springer, Cham (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burns, D., Hyde, P., Killett, A., Poland, F., Gray, R.: Participatory organizational research: examining voice in the co-production of knowledge. Br. J. Manag. 25(1), 133–144 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holgado, M., Evans, S., Benedetti, M.: MAESTRI Deliverable 4.3. Toolkit for industrial symbiosis (2017). https://maestri-spire.eu/downloads/technical-materials/
  10. 10.
    Rana, P., Short, S., Evans, S., Holgado, M., Valkokari, K.: Toolkit for sustainable business modelling. In: Liyanage, J.P., Uusitalo, T (eds.) Value Networks in Manufacturing: Sustainability and Performance Excellence, pp. 123–153. Springer-Verlag (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bocken, N., Short, S., Rana, P., Evans, S.: A value mapping tool for sustainable business modelling. Corp. Gov. 13(5), 482–497 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yang, M., Vladimirova, D., Rana, P., Evans, S.: Sustainable value analysis tool for value creation. Asian J. Manag. Sci. Appl. 1(4), 312–332 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Evans, S., Benedetti, M., Holgado, M.: Library of Industrial Symbiosis case studies and linked exchanges [Dataset] (2017).  https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.12608
  14. 14.
    Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Wiley (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cecelja, F., Raafat, T., Trokanas, N., Innes, S., Smith, M., Yang, A., Zorgios, Y., Korkofygas, A., Kokossis, A.: e-Symbiosis: technology-enabled support for industrial symbiosis targeting small and medium enterprises and innovation. J. Cleaner Prod. 8, 336–352 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Trokanas, N., Cecelja, F., Raafat, T.: Semantic input/output matching for waste processing in industrial symbiosis. Comput. Chem. Eng. 66, 259–268 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    European Commission: “Commission Decision on the European List of Waste”, COM 2000/532/EC (2000). https://goo.gl/3Zm43i. Accessed 19 Dec 2017
  18. 18.
    European Commission: “Regulation (EC) No 451/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 establishing a new statistical classification of products by activity (CPA) and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3696/93” (2008). https://goo.gl/sfhziY. Accessed 19 Dec 2017
  19. 19.
    Grant, G.B., Seager, T.P., Massard, G., Nies, L.: Information and communication technology for industrial symbiosis. J. Ind. Ecol. 14(5), 740–753 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bonino, D., Alizo, M.T.D., Alapetite, A., Gilbert, T., Axling, M., Udsen, H., Soto, J.A.C., Spirito, M.: ALMANAC: Internet of things for smart cities. In: 3rd International Conference on IEEE Future Internet of Things and Cloud (FiCloud), pp. 309–316 (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kamienski, C., Jentsch, M., Eisenhauer, M., Kiljander, J., Ferrera, E., Rosengren, P., Thestrup, J., Souto, E., Andrade, W.S., Sadok, D.: Application development for the Internet of Things: a context-aware mixed criticality systems development platform. Comput. Commun. 104, 1–16 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brizzi, P., Lotito, A., Ferrera, E., Conzon, D., Tomasi, R., Spirito, M.: Enhancing traceability and industrial process automation through the VIRTUS middleware. In: Proceedings of the Middleware 2011 Industry Track Workshop, p. 2. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smith, R.G.: The contract net protocol: high-level communication and control in a distributed problem solver. IEEE Trans. Comput. 12, 1104–1113 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ferrera, E., Conzon, D., Brizzi, P., Rossini, R., Pastrone, C., Jentsch, M., Kool, P., Kamienski, C., Sadok, D.: XMPP-based infrastructure for IoT network management and rapid services and applications development. Ann. Telecommun. 72(7–8), 443–457 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Naik, N.: Choice of effective messaging protocols for IoT systems: MQTT, CoAP, AMQP and HTTP. In: 2017 IEEE International Systems Engineering Symposium (ISSE), Vienna, pp. 1–7 (2017)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lourenço, E.J., Baptista, A.J., Pereira, J.P., Dias-Ferreira, C., Lourenço, E.J., Baptista, A.J., Pereira, J.P., Dias-Ferreira, C.: Multi-layer stream mapping as a combined approach for industrial processes eco-efficiency assessment. In: Re-engineering Manufacturing for Sustainability, pp. 427–433. Springer, Singapore (2013)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lourenço, E.J., Pereira, J.P., Barbosa, R., Baptista, A.J.: Using multi-layer stream mapping to assess the overall efficiency and waste of a production system: a case study from the plywood industry. Procedia CIRP 48, 128–133 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Baptista, A.J., Lourenco, E.J., Pecas, P., Silva, E.J., Estrela, M.A., Holgado, M., Benedetti, M.. Evans, S.: MAESTRI efficiency framework as a support tool for industrial symbiosis implementation. In: Vilarinho, C., Castro, F., de Lurdes Lopes, M. (eds.) 01 September 2017. CRC Press, Porto (2017). ISBN 978-1-351-20617-2Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Baptista, A.J., Lourenço, E.J., Silva, E.J., Estrela, M.A., Peças, P.: Integration of eco-efficiency and efficiency assessment methodologies: the efficiency framework. In: International Conference on Sustainable Design and Manufacturing, pp. 613–623. Springer, Cham (2017)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Baptista, A.J., Lourenço, E.J., Pereira, J.P., Cunha, F., Silva, E.J., Peças, P.: ecoPROSYS: an eco-efficiency framework applied to a medium density fiberboard finishing line. Procedia CIRP 48, 170–175 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Holgado
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Steve Evans
    • 1
  • Miriam Benedetti
    • 1
  • Merane Dubois
    • 1
  • Yan Li
    • 1
  • Dai Morgan
    • 1
  • Enrico Ferrera
    • 3
  • Rosaria Rossini
    • 3
  • Antόnio J. Baptista
    • 4
  • Emanuel Lourenço
    • 4
  • Eduardo J. Silva
    • 5
  • Marco A. Estrela
    • 5
  1. 1.Institute for ManufacturingUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  2. 2.Department of Business and ManagementUniversity of SussexBrightonUK
  3. 3.Istituto Superiore Mario BoellaTurinItaly
  4. 4.Instituto de Engenharia Mecânica e Gestão IndustrialPortoPortugal
  5. 5.Instituto de Soldadura e QualidadeOeirasPortugal

Personalised recommendations