Environmental Practice Adoption in UK Brewing Sector

  • Peter BallEmail author
  • Jill MacBryde
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 130)


The adoption of environmental sustainability practices in manufacturing has the potential to reduce cost, improve resilience and enable business development. Despite the wealth of available practices and their accepted advantages, the rate of adoption is patchy. Much is known about the leaders in this space but leaders by definition are a minority. There is a gap on how the broader industry base is changing and what could help and what hinders their advance. This paper documents research on a single tier of a largely homogenous sector. Through site visits and workshops a picture is created of how brewers are managing their operations and how they can enhance their environmental performance. The contribution of this paper is a novel model to characterize how a sector is adopting practices, what is hindering advance and how the community of like-minded leaders are supporting each other. The work complements the literature on what leaders have done to advance.


Eco-efficient operations Environmental practice adoption Organizational barriers 


  1. 1.
    Anon: Sustainability Benchmarking Report. Brewers Association, Colorado (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bansal, P., Roth, K.: Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Acad. Manag. J. 43, 717–736 (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    BEIR Research on the Carbon Footprint of Beer: Beverage Industry Environment Roundtable (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    BBPA Brewing Green: Our commitment towards a greener future for Britain’s beer and pubs, British Beer & Pub Association (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cherrafi, A., Elfezazi, S., Garza-Reyes, J.A., Benhida, K., Mokhlis, A.: Barriers in Green Lean implementation: a combined systematic literature review and interpretive structural modelling approach. Prod. Plann. Control 28(10), 829–842 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Danson, M., Galloway, L., Cabras, I., Beatty, T.: Microbreweries and entrepreneurship: the origins, development and integration of real ale breweries in the UK. Entrepreneurship Innov. 16(2), 135–144 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Despeisse, M., Mbaye, F., Ball, P.D., Levers, A.: Emergence of sustainable manufacturing practices. Prod. Plann. Control 23(5), 354–376 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fercoq, A., Lamouri, S., Carbone, V.: Lean/Green integration focused on waste reduction techniques. J. Cleaner Prod. 137, 567–578 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Florida, R.: Lean and green: the move to environmentally conscious manufacturing. Calif. Manage. Rev. 39(1), 80–105 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garetti, M., Taisch, M.: Sustainable manufacturing: trends and research challenges. Prod. Plann. Control 23(1–2), 83–104 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Giunipero, L.C., Hooker, R.E., Denslow, D.: Purchasing and supply management sustainability: drivers and barriers. J. Purchasing Supply Manage. 18(4), 258–269 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hartini, S., Ciptomulyono, U.: The relationship between lean and sustainable manufacturing on performance: literature review. Procedia Manuf. 4, 38–45 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    King, A.A., Lenox, M.J.: Lean and Green? An empirical examination of the relationship between lean production and environmental performance. Prod. Oper. Manage. 10(3), 244–256 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kleindorfer, P.R., Singhal, K., Van Wassenhove, L.N.: Sustainable operations management. Prod. Oper. Manage. 14(4), 482–492 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kurdve, M., Zackrisson, M., Wiktorsson, M., Harlin, U.: Lean and green integration into production system models. J. Cleaner Prod. 85, 180–190 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lunt, P., Ball, P., Levers, A.: Barriers to industrial energy efficiency. Int. J. Energy Sect. Manage. 8(3), 380–394 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Piercy, N., Rich, N.: The relationship between lean operations and sustainable operations. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 35(2), 282–315 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rusinko, C.: Green manufacturing: an evaluation of environmentally sustainable manufacturing practices and their impact on competitive outcomes. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 54(3), 445–454 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Seuring, S., Müller, M.: From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J. Cleaner Prod. 16, 1699–1710 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Simons, J.: Number of UK breweries rises 8% in just a year as popularity of craft beer continues to soar. Accessed 24 July 2017
  21. 21.
    Sturm, B., Butcher, M., Wang, Y., Huang, Y., Roskilly, T.: The feasibility of the sustainable energy supply from bio wastes for a small scale brewery - a case study. Appl. Therm. Eng. 39, 45–52 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Subramanian, N., Gunasekaran, A.: Cleaner supply-chain management practices for twenty-first-century organizational competitiveness. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 164, 216–233 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Williamson, D., Lynch-Wood, G., Ramsay, J.: Drivers of environmental behaviour in manufacturing SMEs and the implications for CSR. J. Bus. Ethics 67(3), 317–330 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yang, M.A., Hong, P., Modi, S.B.: Impact of lean manufacturing and environmental management on business performance. Int. J. Prod. Eng. 129(2), 251–261 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J.: Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. J. Oper. Manage. 22(3), 265–289 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The York Management SchoolUniversity of YorkYorkUK

Personalised recommendations