Advertisement

Incorporating Text into the Triple Context for Knowledge Graph Embedding

  • Liang ZhangEmail author
  • Jun Shi
  • Guilin QiEmail author
  • Weizhuo Li
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11341)

Abstract

Knowledge graph embedding, aiming to represent entities and relations in a knowledge graph as low-dimensional real-value vectors, has attracted the attention of a large number of researchers. However, most of the embedding methods ignore the incompleteness of the knowledge graphs and they focus on the triples themselves in the knowledge graphs. In this paper, we try to introduce the information of texts to enhance the performances based on contextual model for knowledge graph embedding. Based on the assumption of the distant supervision, the sentences in texts contains abundant semantic information of the triples in knowledge graph, so that these semantic information can be utilized to relief the incompleteness of knowledge graphs and enhance the performances of knowledge graph embedding. Compared with state-of-the-art systems, preliminary evaluation results show that our proposed method obtains the better results in Hits@10.

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work is mainly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant no. U1736204.

References

  1. 1.
    Bordes, A., Usunier, N., Garcia-Duran, A., Weston, J., Yakhnenko, O.: Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2787–2795 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lin, Y., Liu, Z., Sun, M., Liu, Y., Zhu, X.: Learning entity and relation embeddings for knowledge graph completion. In: AAAI, vol. 15, pp. 2181–2187 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ji, G., He, S., Xu, L., Liu, K., Zhao, J.: Knowledge graph embedding via dynamic mapping matrix. In: Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Long Papers), vol. 1, pp. 687–696 (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ji, G., Liu, K., He, S., Zhao, J.: Knowledge graph completion with adaptive sparse transfer matrix. In: AAAI, pp. 985–991 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang, B., Yih, W.T., He, X., Gao, J., Deng, L.: Embedding entities and relations for learning and inference in knowledge bases. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6575 (2014)
  6. 6.
    Lin, Y., Liu, Z., Luan, H., Sun, M., Rao, S., Liu, S.: Modeling relation paths for representation learning of knowledge bases. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.00379 (2015)
  7. 7.
    Guu, K., Miller, J., Liang, P.: Traversing knowledge graphs in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.01094 (2015)
  8. 8.
    Feng, J., Huang, M., Yang, Y., et al.: Gake: graph aware knowledge embedding. In: Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, pp. 641–651 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shi, J., Gao, H., Qi, G., Zhou, Z.: Knowledge graph embedding with triple context. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 2299–2302. ACM (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang, Z., Zhang, J., Feng, J., Chen, Z.: Knowledge graph and text jointly embedding. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 1591–1601 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xie, R., Liu, Z., Jia, J., Luan, H., Sun, M.: Representation learning of knowledge graphs with entity descriptions. In: AAAI, pp. 2659–2665 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bollacker, K., Evans, C., Paritosh, P., Sturge, T., Taylor, J.: Freebase: a collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 1247–1250. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mintz, M., Bills, S., Snow, R., Jurafsky, D.: Distant supervision for relation extraction without labeled data. In: Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, vol. 2, pp. 1003–1011. Association for Computational Linguistics (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zeng, D., Liu, K., Chen, Y., Zhao, J.: Distant supervision for relation extraction via piecewise convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1753–1762 (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., Bengio, Y.: Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.0473 (2014)
  16. 16.
    Riedel, S., Yao, L., McCallum, A.: Modeling relations and their mentions without labeled text. In: Balcázar, J.L., Bonchi, F., Gionis, A., Sebag, M. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6323, pp. 148–163. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15939-8_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang, Z., Li, J.Z.: Text-enhanced representation learning for knowledge graph. In: IJCAI, pp. 1293–1299 (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhong, H., Zhang, J., Wang, Z., Wan, H., Chen, Z.: Aligning knowledge and text embeddings by entity descriptions. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 267–272 (2015)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Toutanova, K., Chen, D., Pantel, P., Poon, H., Choudhury, P., Gamon, M.: Representing text for joint embedding of text and knowledge bases. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1499–1509 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer Science and EngineeringSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations