Abstract
The main purpose of this first lecture is to introduce the concept of canonical surface charges in a generally covariant theory of gravity, whose General Relativity is the most famous representative. We will first show that a conserved stress tensor can be generated for any classical field theory. We will then motivate why we cannot define conserved currents and charges in Noether’s fashion for generally covariant theories, and more globally, for theories that include gauge transformations. This will lead us to extend Noether’s first theorem to formulate lower degree conservation laws, which will be exploitable for theories such as Einstein’s gravity. On the way, we will discuss about the symplectic structure of abstract spaces of fields, and use the covariant phase space formalism to derive a powerful result linking this structure and the lower degree conserved forms. We will then be able to compute surface charges associated to these quantities and study their properties and their algebra. Along the text, some pedagogical examples will be provided, namely for pure Einstein’s gravity, and Maxwells electrodynamics. Finally, we will present another possible definition of these surface charges and use the latter definition as an efficient tool to derive the conserved charges of Chern-Simons theory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
A Cauchy surface is a subset of M which is intersected by every maximal causal curve exactly once. Once the initial data is fixed on such a codimension 1 surface, the field equations lead to the evolution of the system in the entire spacetime.
- 2.
Remember that Σ being a Cauchy slice (and so by definition a (n − 1)-dimensional volumic object), ∂ Σ is nothing but a (n − 2)-surface ! Take n = 4 to clarify the role of any geometric structure…
- 3.
If the charge is not finite, it means that the boundary conditions constraining the fields on which we are defining the charges are too large and not physical. If the charge is not integrable, one could attempt to redefine ξ μ as a function of the fields to solve the integrability condition.
- 4.
References
L.F. Abbott, S. Deser, Stability of gravity with a cosmological constant. Nucl. Phys. B195, 76–96 (1982). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(82)90049-9
R.L. Arnowitt, S. Deser, C.W. Misner, Dynamical structure and definition of energy in general relativity. Phys. Rev. 116, 1322–1330 (1959). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.116.1322
T. Azeyanagi, G. Compère, N. Ogawa, Y. Tachikawa, S. Terashima, Higher-derivative corrections to the asymptotic virasoro symmetry of 4d extremal black holes. Prog. Theor. Phys. 122, 355–384 (2009). arXiv:0903.4176 [hep-th]; http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTP.122.355
G. Barnich, F. Brandt, Covariant theory of asymptotic symmetries, conservation laws and central charges. Nucl. Phys. B633, 3–82 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0111246 [hep-th]; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00251-1
G. Barnich, G. Compère, Surface charge algebra in gauge theories and thermodynamic integrability. J. Math. Phys. 49, 042901 (2008). arXiv:0708.2378 [gr-qc]; http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2889721
G. Barnich, F. Brandt, M. Henneaux, Local BRST cohomology in gauge theories. Phys. Rep. 338, 439–569 (2000) . arXiv:hep-th/0002245 [hep-th]; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00049-1
J.D. Brown, M. Henneaux, On the Poisson brackets of differentiable generators in classical field theory. J. Math. Phys. 27, 489–491 (1986). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.527249
G. Compère, Symmetries and conservation laws in Lagrangian gauge theories with applications to the mechanics of black holes and to gravity in three dimensions. PhD thesis, Brussels U., 2007. arXiv:0708.3153 [hep-th]; http://inspirehep.net/record/758992/files/arXiv:0708.3153.pdf
G. Compère, F. Dehouck, Relaxing the parity conditions of asymptotically flat gravity. Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 245016 (2011). arXiv:1106.4045 [hep-th]; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/28/24/245016; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/30/3/039501 [Erratum: Class. Quant. Grav. 30, 039501 (2013)]
G. Compère, D. Marolf, Setting the boundary free in AdS/CFT. Class. Quant. Grav. 25, 195014 (2008). arXiv:0805.1902 [hep-th]; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/25/19/195014
G. Compère, K. Murata, T. Nishioka, Central charges in extreme black Hole/CFT correspondence. J. High Energy Phys. 05, 077 (2009). arXiv:0902.1001 [hep-th]; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2009/05/077
G. Compère, L. Donnay, P.-H. Lambert, W. Schulgin, Liouville theory beyond the cosmological horizon. J. High Energy Phys. 1503, 158 (2015). arXiv:1411.7873 [hep-th]; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2015)158
G. Compère, K. Hajian, A. Seraj, M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari, Wiggling throat of extremal black holes. J. High Energy Phys. 10, 093 (2015). arXiv:1506.07181 [hep-th]; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2015)093
G. Compère, P. Mao, A. Seraj, M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari, Symplectic and killing symmetries of AdS3 gravity: holographic vs boundary gravitons. J. High Energy Phys. 01, 080 (2016). arXiv:1511.06079 [hep-th]; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2016)080
S. Deser, B. Tekin, Gravitational energy in quadratic curvature gravities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 101101 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0205318 [hep-th]; http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.101101
S. Deser, B. Tekin, Energy in generic higher curvature gravity theories. Phys. Rev. D67, 084009 (2003). arXiv:hep-th/0212292 [hep-th]; http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.67.084009
P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, D. Senechal, Conformal Field Theory. Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics (Springer, New York, 1997). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2256-9; http://www-spires.fnal.gov/spires/find/books/www?cl=QC174.52.C66D5::1997
V. Iyer, R.M. Wald, Some properties of Noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy. Phys. Rev. D50, 846–864 (1994). arXiv:gr-qc/9403028 [gr-qc]; http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.50.846
J. Lee, R.M. Wald, Local symmetries and constraints. J. Math. Phys. 31, 725–743 (1990). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.528801
T. Regge, C. Teitelboim, Role of surface integrals in the Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity. Ann. Phys. 88, 286 (1974). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(74)90404-7
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Compère, G. (2019). Surface Charges in Gravitation. In: Advanced Lectures on General Relativity. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 952. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04260-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04260-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04259-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04260-8
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)