Advertisement

Acquiring Metadata to Support Biographies of Museum Artefacts

  • Can ZhaoEmail author
  • Michael B. Twidale
  • David M. Nichols
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11279)

Abstract

Museum collections are primarily experienced in physical museums. Metadata and linked data have the potential to support new models of interaction with heritage objects outside museums. Object biographies are a conceptual lens through which to view object metadata. We explore the concept of object biography through an interview-based study of selected artefacts from local New Zealand museums. We discuss how the nature of this metadata can support new object-centric interaction in the wider environment.

Keywords

Metadata Museum Object biography 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the participants, notably those from local heritage institutions.

References

  1. 1.
    Bekele, M.K., Pierdicca, R., Frontoni, E., Malinverni, E.S., Gain, J.: A survey of augmented, virtual, and mixed reality for cultural heritage. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 11(2), 1–36 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3145534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Both, J., de Hooge, D., IJff, R., Inel, O., de Boer, V., Aroyo, L.: Linking Dutch World War II cultural heritage collections with events extracted by machines and crowds. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2063. (2017). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2063/events-paper3.pdf
  3. 3.
    Burrows, T., Hyvönen, E., Ransom, L., Wijsman, H.: Mapping manuscript migrations: digging into data for the history and provenance of medieval and renaissance manuscripts. Manuscr. Stud.: J. Schoenberg Inst. Manuscr. Studies 3(1), 249–252 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1353/mns.2018.0012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ciolfi, L.: Can digital interactions support new dialogue around heritage? Interactions 25(2), 24–25 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3181368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, H.L., Marty, P.F.: The digital museum in the life of the user. Proc. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 42(1) (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.1450420132Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cushing, A.L., Cowan, B.R.: Walk 1916: exploring non-research user access to and use of digital surrogates via a mobile walking tour app. J. Doc. 73(5), 917–933 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2017-0031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dijkshoorn, C., et al.: The Rijksmuseum collection as linked data. Semant. Web 9(2), 221–230 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-170257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fenu, C., Pittarello, F.: Svevo tour: The design and the experimentation of an augmented reality application for engaging visitors of a literary museum. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 114, 20–35 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.01.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fokkens, A., et al.: BiographyNet: extracting relations between people and events. In: Bernád, Á.Z., Gruber, C., Kaiser, M. (eds.) Europa baut auf Biographien: Aspekte, Bausteine, Normen und Standards für eine europäische Biographik, pp. 193–224. New Academic Press, Wien (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gosden, C., Marshall, Y.: The cultural biography of objects. World Archaeol. 31(2), 169–178 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1999.9980439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Hyvönen, E., Leskinen, P., Tamper, M., Tuominen, J., Keravuori, K.: Semantic national biography of Finland. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2084, pp. 372–385 (2018). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2084/short12.pdf
  14. 14.
    Joy, J.: Reinvigorating object biography: reproducing the drama of object lives. World Archaeol. 41(4), 540–556 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240903345530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kopytoff, I.: The cultural biography of things: commoditisation as process. In: Appadurai, A. (ed.) The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, pp. 64–91. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Larson, R.: Bringing lives to light: biography in context. Final report of Electronic Cultural Atlas Initiative, University of California, Berkeley (2010). https://www.ischool.berkeley.edu/events/2010/bringing-lives-light-biography-project
  17. 17.
    Law, E.L.-C.: Augmenting the experience of a museum visit with a geo-located AR app for an associated archaeological site. In: Vermeeren, A., Calvi, L., Sabiescu, A. (eds.) Museum Experience Design. SSCC, pp. 205–224. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58550-5_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee, G.A., Dünser, A., Kim, S., Billinghurst, M.: CityViewAR: a mobile outdoor AR application for city visualization. In: IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality 2012 Arts, Media, and Humanities Proceedings, pp. 57–64. IEEE, New York (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ismar-amh.2012.6483989
  19. 19.
    Marty, P.F.: My lost museum: user expectations and motivations for creating personal digital collections on museum websites. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 33(3), 211–219 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2010.11.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McGookin, D., Tahiroălu, K., Vaittinen, T., Kytö, M., Monastero, B., Vasquez, J.C.: Exploring seasonality in mobile cultural heritage. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 6101–6105. ACM, New York (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025803
  21. 21.
    Monti, F., Keene, S.: Museums and Silent Objects: Designing Effective Exhibitions. Ashgate Publishing, Farnham (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pye, E.: Challenges of conservation: working objects. Sci. Mus. Group J. 6 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.15180/160608
  23. 23.
    Vassilakis, C., Poulopoulos, V., Antoniou, A., Wallace, M., Lepouras, G., Nores, M.L.: exhiSTORY: smart exhibits that tell their own stories. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 81, 542–556 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.10.038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Webley, L., Adams, S.: Material genealogies: bronze moulds and their castings in later Bronze Age Britain. Proc. Prehist. Soc. 82, 323–340 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1017/ppr.2016.8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand
  2. 2.School of Information SciencesUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations