Abstract
Increasingly, as the discussions in the preceding chapters show, economic rationales and logics pervade educational thinking and practice; business strategies and modes of operation progressively penetrate the education sector with the active involvement of business actors and stakeholders. In the concluding chapter, we want to go beyond the particular expressions and manifestations of the Global Education Industry (GEI) phenomenon by discerning different but overarching rationales, logics, and modes of operation identified from a more synthetic reading of the chapters included in this volume. The chapter is rounded out by raising questions as to the social dislocations gaped open by the GEI phenomena and interrogations of theoretical lenses that guide our analyses.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
We would like to thank Frank-Olaf Radtke for his perceptive comments on these issues, in particular his pointing to the shortcomings of contemporary theoretical perspectives in assessing the phenomena encompassed in the GEI.
References
Ball, S. J. (2017). Laboring to Relate: Neoliberalism, Embodied Policy, and Network Dynamics. Peabody Journal of Education, 92, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2016.1264802
Bauman, Z., & Lyon, D. (2013). Liquid Surveillance. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Bellmann, J. (2016). Datengetrieben und/oder evidenzbasiert? Wirkungsmechanismen bildungspolitischer Steuerungsansätze. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 19(Suppl. 1), 147–161.
Bellmann, J., & Müller, T. (Eds.). (2011). Wissen, was wirkt. Kritik evidenzbasierter Pädagogik. Wiesbaden: VS Springer.
Berliner, D. C., & Biddle, B. J. (1995). The Manufactured Crisis. Myths, Fraud, and the Attack on America’s Public Schools. New York: Longman.
Biesta, G. (2007). Why “What Work” Won’t Work: Evidence-Based Practice and the Democratic Deficit in Educational Research. Educational Theory, 47(1), 1–22.
BMBF (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung). (Ed.). (2008). Wissen für Handeln – Strategien für eine evidenzbasierte Bildungspolitik. Bonn/Berlin, Germany: BMBF.
Bogenschneider, K., & Corbett, T. J. (2010). Evidence-Based Policymaking: Insights from Policy-Minded Researchers and Research-Minded Policymakers. New York: Routledge.
Centeno, V. G. (2017). The OECD’s Educational Agendas. Framed from Above, Fed from Below, Determined in Interaction. A Study on the Recurrent Education Agenda. Berlin, Germany: Peter Lang.
Cizek, G. J. (1999). Give Us This Day Our Daily Dread: Manufacturing Crises in Education. The Phi Delta Kappan, 80(10), 737–743. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20439557
Crouch, C. (2013). Interview. Five Minutes with Colin Crouch. Retrieved online: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/five-minutes-with-colin-crouch/. Last 19 July 2018.
Danaher, J. (2014). Rule by Algorithm? Big Data and the Threat of Algocracy. Retrieved from: http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/danaher20140107. Last 19 July 2018.
Danaher, J. (2017). Algocracy as Hypernudging: A New Way to Understand the Threat of Algocracy. Retrieved online: https://ieet.org/index.php/IEET2/more/Danaher20170117. Last 19 July 2018.
Easterling, K. (2014). Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructure Space. New York: Verso Books.
Ertl, H. (2006). Educational Standards and the Changing Discourse on Education: The Reception and Consequences of the PISA Study in Germany. Oxford Review of Education, 32(5), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980600976320
Feuer, M. J., Towne, L., & Shavelson, R. J. (2002). Scientific Culture and Educational Research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 4–14.
Foucault, M. (1984). What Is Enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault Reader (pp. 32–50). New York: Pantheon Books.
FSG. (2014). The New Role of Business in Global Education. How Companies Can Create Shared Value by Improving Education While Driving Shareholder Returns. Retrieved online: https://www.fsg.org/publications/new-role-business-global-education. Last 19 July 2018.
Godin, B. (2015). Innovation: A Conceptual History of an Anonymous Concept (Working Paper No. 2). Retrieved online: http://www.csiic.ca/PDF/WorkingPaper21.pdf. Last 19 July 2018.
Gruber, K.-H. (2006). The German ‘PISA-Shock’: Some Aspects of the Extraordinary Impact of the OECD’s PISA Study on the German Education System. In H. Ertl (Ed.), Cross-National Attraction in Education: Accounts from England and Germany (pp. 195–206). Oxford, UK: Symposium Books.
Halpern, D., & Sanders, M. (2016). Nudging by Government: Progress, Impact & Lessons Learned. Behavioral Science & Policy, 2, 53–65.
Hartong, S. (2016a). New Structures of Power and Regulation within ‘Distributed’ Education Policy: The Example of the US Common Core State Standards Initiative. Journal of Education Policy, 31(2), 213–225.
Hartong, S. (2016b). Between Assessments, Digital Technologies, and Big Data: The Growing Influence of ‘Hidden’ Data Mediators in Education. European Educational Research Journal, 15(5), 523–536.
Hartong, S. (2018). Towards a Topological Re-Assemblage of Education Policy? Observing the Implementation of Performance Data Infrastructures and ‘Centers of Calculation’ in Germany. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 16(1), 134–150.
Heukelom, F. (2014). Behavioral Economics: A History. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Homann, K. (2006). Wirtschaftsethik: Ökonomischer Reduktionismus? Diskussionspapier Nr. 2006–3. Retrieved from: https://www.wcge.org/images/wissenschaft/publikationen/DP_2006-3_Homann-Wirtschaftsethik_oekonomischer_Reduktionismus.pdf. Last 19 July 2018.
Jessop, B. (2002). The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Jessop, B., Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (Eds.). (2008). Education and the Knowledge-Based Economy in Europe. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Latour, B., & Lépinay, V. (2008). L’économie, science des intérêts passionnés. Paris: La Découverte.
Lingard, B., Creagh, S., & Vass, G. (2012). Education Policy as Numbers: Data Categories and Two Australian Cases of Misrecognition. Journal of Education Policy, 27(3), 315–333.
Lingard, B., & Rawolle, S. (2011). New Scalar Politics: Implications for Education Policy. Comparative Education, 47(4), 1–18.
Neckel, S. (2013). “Refeudalisierung” – Systematik und Aktualität eines Begriffs der Habermas’chen Gesellschaftanalyse. Leviathan, 41(1), 39–56.
OECD. (2017). Behavioural Insights and Public Policy: Lessons from Around the World. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Ozga, J. (2009). Governing Education Through Data in England: From Regulation to Self-Evaluation. Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), 149–162.
Peters, M. A., Paraskeva, J. M., & Besley, T. (Eds.). (2015). The Global Financial Crisis and Educational Restructuring. New York: Peter Lang.
Porter, M. E. (2014). Foreword. In FSG, The New Role of Business in Global Education. How Companies Can Create Shared Value by Improving Education While Driving Shareholder Returns. Retrieved online: https://www.fsg.org/publications/new-role-business-global-education. Last 19 July 2018.
Radtke, F.-O. (2016). Konditionierte Strukturverbesserung. Umbau und Neuformierung der deutschen Erziehungswissenschaft flankiert von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft unter Anleitung der OECD verwirklicht von der Kultusministerkonferenz. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 62(5), 707–731.
Reckwitz, A. (2017). Die Gesellschaft der Singularitäten. Berlin, Germany: Suhrkamp.
Simon, H. A. (1984). On the Behavioral and Rational Foundations of Economic Dynamics. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 5, 35–55.
Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-Based Education Policies: Transforming Education Practice and Research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21.
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Tooley, J., & Darby, D. (1998). Educational Research: A Critique. London: OFSTED.
Verger, A., Lubienski, C., & Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2016). The Emergence and Structuring of the Global Education Industry. Towards an Analytical Framework. In A. Verger, C. Lubienski, & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), The Global Education Industry (pp. 3–24). New York: Routledge.
Vogl, J. (2015). Der Souveränitätseffekt. Zürich, Switzerland: Diaphanes.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parreira do Amaral, M., Thompson, C. (2019). Conclusion: Changing Education in the GEI—Rationales, Logics, and Modes of Operation. In: Parreira do Amaral, M., Steiner-Khamsi, G., Thompson, C. (eds) Researching the Global Education Industry. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04236-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04236-3_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04235-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04236-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)