Skip to main content

Conclusion: Changing Education in the GEI—Rationales, Logics, and Modes of Operation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Researching the Global Education Industry

Abstract

Increasingly, as the discussions in the preceding chapters show, economic rationales and logics pervade educational thinking and practice; business strategies and modes of operation progressively penetrate the education sector with the active involvement of business actors and stakeholders. In the concluding chapter, we want to go beyond the particular expressions and manifestations of the Global Education Industry (GEI) phenomenon by discerning different but overarching rationales, logics, and modes of operation identified from a more synthetic reading of the chapters included in this volume. The chapter is rounded out by raising questions as to the social dislocations gaped open by the GEI phenomena and interrogations of theoretical lenses that guide our analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See for instance: Berliner & Biddle (1995); Cizek (1999); Ertl (2006); Gruber (2006).

  2. 2.

    We would like to thank Frank-Olaf Radtke for his perceptive comments on these issues, in particular his pointing to the shortcomings of contemporary theoretical perspectives in assessing the phenomena encompassed in the GEI.

References

  • Ball, S. J. (2017). Laboring to Relate: Neoliberalism, Embodied Policy, and Network Dynamics. Peabody Journal of Education, 92, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2016.1264802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z., & Lyon, D. (2013). Liquid Surveillance. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellmann, J. (2016). Datengetrieben und/oder evidenzbasiert? Wirkungsmechanismen bildungspolitischer Steuerungsansätze. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 19(Suppl. 1), 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellmann, J., & Müller, T. (Eds.). (2011). Wissen, was wirkt. Kritik evidenzbasierter Pädagogik. Wiesbaden: VS Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. C., & Biddle, B. J. (1995). The Manufactured Crisis. Myths, Fraud, and the Attack on America’s Public Schools. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2007). Why “What Work” Won’t Work: Evidence-Based Practice and the Democratic Deficit in Educational Research. Educational Theory, 47(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BMBF (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung). (Ed.). (2008). Wissen für Handeln – Strategien für eine evidenzbasierte Bildungspolitik. Bonn/Berlin, Germany: BMBF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogenschneider, K., & Corbett, T. J. (2010). Evidence-Based Policymaking: Insights from Policy-Minded Researchers and Research-Minded Policymakers. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centeno, V. G. (2017). The OECD’s Educational Agendas. Framed from Above, Fed from Below, Determined in Interaction. A Study on the Recurrent Education Agenda. Berlin, Germany: Peter Lang.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cizek, G. J. (1999). Give Us This Day Our Daily Dread: Manufacturing Crises in Education. The Phi Delta Kappan, 80(10), 737–743. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20439557

  • Crouch, C. (2013). Interview. Five Minutes with Colin Crouch. Retrieved online: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/five-minutes-with-colin-crouch/. Last 19 July 2018.

  • Danaher, J. (2014). Rule by Algorithm? Big Data and the Threat of Algocracy. Retrieved from: http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/danaher20140107. Last 19 July 2018.

  • Danaher, J. (2017). Algocracy as Hypernudging: A New Way to Understand the Threat of Algocracy. Retrieved online: https://ieet.org/index.php/IEET2/more/Danaher20170117. Last 19 July 2018.

  • Easterling, K. (2014). Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructure Space. New York: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertl, H. (2006). Educational Standards and the Changing Discourse on Education: The Reception and Consequences of the PISA Study in Germany. Oxford Review of Education, 32(5), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980600976320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feuer, M. J., Towne, L., & Shavelson, R. J. (2002). Scientific Culture and Educational Research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984). What Is Enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault Reader (pp. 32–50). New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • FSG. (2014). The New Role of Business in Global Education. How Companies Can Create Shared Value by Improving Education While Driving Shareholder Returns. Retrieved online: https://www.fsg.org/publications/new-role-business-global-education. Last 19 July 2018.

  • Godin, B. (2015). Innovation: A Conceptual History of an Anonymous Concept (Working Paper No. 2). Retrieved online: http://www.csiic.ca/PDF/WorkingPaper21.pdf. Last 19 July 2018.

  • Gruber, K.-H. (2006). The German ‘PISA-Shock’: Some Aspects of the Extraordinary Impact of the OECD’s PISA Study on the German Education System. In H. Ertl (Ed.), Cross-National Attraction in Education: Accounts from England and Germany (pp. 195–206). Oxford, UK: Symposium Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D., & Sanders, M. (2016). Nudging by Government: Progress, Impact & Lessons Learned. Behavioral Science & Policy, 2, 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartong, S. (2016a). New Structures of Power and Regulation within ‘Distributed’ Education Policy: The Example of the US Common Core State Standards Initiative. Journal of Education Policy, 31(2), 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartong, S. (2016b). Between Assessments, Digital Technologies, and Big Data: The Growing Influence of ‘Hidden’ Data Mediators in Education. European Educational Research Journal, 15(5), 523–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartong, S. (2018). Towards a Topological Re-Assemblage of Education Policy? Observing the Implementation of Performance Data Infrastructures and ‘Centers of Calculation’ in Germany. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 16(1), 134–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heukelom, F. (2014). Behavioral Economics: A History. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Homann, K. (2006). Wirtschaftsethik: Ökonomischer Reduktionismus? Diskussionspapier Nr. 2006–3. Retrieved from: https://www.wcge.org/images/wissenschaft/publikationen/DP_2006-3_Homann-Wirtschaftsethik_oekonomischer_Reduktionismus.pdf. Last 19 July 2018.

  • Jessop, B. (2002). The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B., Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (Eds.). (2008). Education and the Knowledge-Based Economy in Europe. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., & Lépinay, V. (2008). L’économie, science des intérêts passionnés. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., Creagh, S., & Vass, G. (2012). Education Policy as Numbers: Data Categories and Two Australian Cases of Misrecognition. Journal of Education Policy, 27(3), 315–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., & Rawolle, S. (2011). New Scalar Politics: Implications for Education Policy. Comparative Education, 47(4), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neckel, S. (2013). “Refeudalisierung” – Systematik und Aktualität eines Begriffs der Habermas’chen Gesellschaftanalyse. Leviathan, 41(1), 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2017). Behavioural Insights and Public Policy: Lessons from Around the World. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ozga, J. (2009). Governing Education Through Data in England: From Regulation to Self-Evaluation. Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), 149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. A., Paraskeva, J. M., & Besley, T. (Eds.). (2015). The Global Financial Crisis and Educational Restructuring. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (2014). Foreword. In FSG, The New Role of Business in Global Education. How Companies Can Create Shared Value by Improving Education While Driving Shareholder Returns. Retrieved online: https://www.fsg.org/publications/new-role-business-global-education. Last 19 July 2018.

  • Radtke, F.-O. (2016). Konditionierte Strukturverbesserung. Umbau und Neuformierung der deutschen Erziehungswissenschaft flankiert von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft unter Anleitung der OECD verwirklicht von der Kultusministerkonferenz. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 62(5), 707–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, A. (2017). Die Gesellschaft der Singularitäten. Berlin, Germany: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1984). On the Behavioral and Rational Foundations of Economic Dynamics. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 5, 35–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-Based Education Policies: Transforming Education Practice and Research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooley, J., & Darby, D. (1998). Educational Research: A Critique. London: OFSTED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verger, A., Lubienski, C., & Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2016). The Emergence and Structuring of the Global Education Industry. Towards an Analytical Framework. In A. Verger, C. Lubienski, & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), The Global Education Industry (pp. 3–24). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogl, J. (2015). Der Souveränitätseffekt. Zürich, Switzerland: Diaphanes.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo Parreira do Amaral .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Parreira do Amaral, M., Thompson, C. (2019). Conclusion: Changing Education in the GEI—Rationales, Logics, and Modes of Operation. In: Parreira do Amaral, M., Steiner-Khamsi, G., Thompson, C. (eds) Researching the Global Education Industry. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04236-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04236-3_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04235-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04236-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics